A Audio, hi-fi and car audio  forum. Audio Banter

Go Back   Home » Audio Banter forum » UK Audio Newsgroups » uk.rec.audio (General Audio and Hi-Fi)
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

uk.rec.audio (General Audio and Hi-Fi) (uk.rec.audio) Discussion and exchange of hi-fi audio equipment.

Quad's dynamic speakers



 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old November 10th 04, 10:14 PM posted to rec.audio.opinion,uk.rec.audio
AKT
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 10
Default Quad's dynamic speakers

To avoid any misunderstanding, this post is not about ESL's but Quad's
dynamic speakers (21/22L?). A claim was made in another post that these
are "much better" than Spendor, Proac, Dynaudio. I was wondering if
people strongly agree or disagree with that.

I happen to own Spendor BC-1's and occasionally toy with the idea of
either a current Spendor or a Proac/Dynaudio model as possible upgrade.
However, if 21/22L's are better that will surely simplify my fantasy
life. All in all, are the Quads an improvement on BC-1's or more of
a horizontal move?

Thanks and I do know I have to make any purchase decisions myself. I am
merely curious about the opinion of those who happen to know these
speakers.
  #2 (permalink)  
Old November 10th 04, 11:16 PM posted to rec.audio.opinion,uk.rec.audio
MiNe 109
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 109
Default Quad's dynamic speakers

In article , AKT
wrote:

To avoid any misunderstanding, this post is not about ESL's but Quad's
dynamic speakers (21/22L?). A claim was made in another post that these
are "much better" than Spendor, Proac, Dynaudio. I was wondering if
people strongly agree or disagree with that.

I happen to own Spendor BC-1's and occasionally toy with the idea of
either a current Spendor or a Proac/Dynaudio model as possible upgrade.
However, if 21/22L's are better that will surely simplify my fantasy
life. All in all, are the Quads an improvement on BC-1's or more of
a horizontal move?

Thanks and I do know I have to make any purchase decisions myself. I am
merely curious about the opinion of those who happen to know these
speakers.


I believe the claim was that ESLs are much better. However, I'm also
curious about these speakers.

Stephen
  #3 (permalink)  
Old November 11th 04, 06:24 AM posted to rec.audio.opinion,uk.rec.audio
Stewart Pinkerton
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 3,367
Default Quad's dynamic speakers

On Wed, 10 Nov 2004 23:14:06 GMT, AKT wrote:

To avoid any misunderstanding, this post is not about ESL's but Quad's
dynamic speakers (21/22L?). A claim was made in another post that these
are "much better" than Spendor, Proac, Dynaudio. I was wondering if
people strongly agree or disagree with that.


Disagree, but there's no need for strength! :-)

I happen to own Spendor BC-1's and occasionally toy with the idea of
either a current Spendor or a Proac/Dynaudio model as possible upgrade.
However, if 21/22L's are better that will surely simplify my fantasy
life. All in all, are the Quads an improvement on BC-1's or more of
a horizontal move?


They are an improvement, but only because they're thirty years newer!
Try new Spendors, or particularly the Dynaudio Audience 52SE.
--

Stewart Pinkerton | Music is Art - Audio is Engineering
  #4 (permalink)  
Old November 13th 04, 10:52 PM posted to rec.audio.opinion,uk.rec.audio
AKT
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 10
Default "Wharfedale Quad"?

At times I have come across the phrase "Wharfdale Quad" seemingly
implying as if the two companies had merged. Is that the case? Or are
Quad producs still eparate?
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT. The time now is 02:20 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.SEO by vBSEO 3.0.0
Copyright ©2004-2025 Audio Banter.
The comments are property of their posters.