![]() |
4 ohm watts and 8 ohm watts
I've found a forthcoming power amplifier that I may be interested in, but
the only specs available at present are that it does 500W into 8 ohms bridged for mono, and 230W per channel into 4 ohms. What would be its likely stereo output into 8 ohms? -- Wally www.artbywally.com/FiatPandaRally/index.htm www.wally.myby.co.uk |
4 ohm watts and 8 ohm watts
On Sun, 10 Apr 2005 15:42:39 GMT, "Wally" wrote:
I've found a forthcoming power amplifier that I may be interested in, but the only specs available at present are that it does 500W into 8 ohms bridged for mono, and 230W per channel into 4 ohms. What would be its likely stereo output into 8 ohms? Those numbers don't quite stack up, but you will get something like 120W per channel - perhaps a bit more. d Pearce Consulting http://www.pearce.uk.com |
4 ohm watts and 8 ohm watts
"Wally" wrote in message ... I've found a forthcoming power amplifier that I may be interested in, but the only specs available at present are that it does 500W into 8 ohms bridged for mono, and 230W per channel into 4 ohms. What would be its likely stereo output into 8 ohms? -- Wally www.artbywally.com/FiatPandaRally/index.htm www.wally.myby.co.uk It should be 125W per chan - and 230W into 4R indicates that it propably has a good power supply as well. What it does not show however is the conditions under which the power measurements were taken, or the current driving capability of the outputs, so one channel into 8R might actually do rather more than 125W. -- Woody harrogate2 at ntlworld dot com |
4 ohm watts and 8 ohm watts
On Sun, 10 Apr 2005 15:42:39 GMT, "Wally" wrote:
I've found a forthcoming power amplifier that I may be interested in, but the only specs available at present are that it does 500W into 8 ohms bridged for mono, and 230W per channel into 4 ohms. What would be its likely stereo output into 8 ohms? Likely to be about 130 watts/channel into 8 ohms, but that alone doesn't make it a good amplifier................... -- Stewart Pinkerton | Music is Art - Audio is Engineering |
4 ohm watts and 8 ohm watts
Stewart Pinkerton wrote:
What would be its likely stereo output into 8 ohms? Likely to be about 130 watts/channel into 8 ohms, but that alone doesn't make it a good amplifier................... Didn't say it did. :-) It's another Behringer jobbie. Although I have little to go on, other than other people's opinions of their kit, and my experience of the active crossover, I'm gravitating towards the idea that their stuff might just be rather good. No techy specs as yet, but here's the spiel from their web site (note that it isn't available yet, so this is essentially marketing blurb)... --------------------------------------------------- Professional 500-Watt Reference-Class Studio Power Amplifier This ultra-linear power amplifier is the top choice for recording studios and post-production work, yet its amazing price is just the beginning. You get true audiophile-grade performance that delivers 2 x 230 Watts into 4 Ohms or 500 Watts into 8 Ohms bridged, with enough overhead to always keep you on the safe side. The A500's advanced convection-type cooling system guarantees stable, noise-free operation, while its servo-controlled design can drive virtually all passive speakers. A precise level meter and clip indicators are provided for accurate performance monitoring. Input connections are laid out on balanced XLR, 1/4'' TRS and RCA connectors, making sure you never run out of connectivity options. Plus, the speaker outputs give you a choice between professional ''touch-proof'' binding posts and 1/4'' TS connectors. To assure years of trouble-free operation, we only use the ultra-reliable Toshiba® or Fairchild® high-power transistors that are known for their rock-solid reputation. In addition to all these features, an independent thermal overload protection system with LED indicators for each channel automatically protects both your amplifier and your speakers. Last but not least, we have relied on a tough high-current toroidal transformer for absolute reliability and lowest noise interference possible. You and your clients deserve the very best in studio power amplification. Get the A500 and it will be love at first sight: it is super affordable, super effective and super flexible! --------------------------------------------------- -- Wally www.artbywally.com/FiatPandaRally/index.htm www.wally.myby.co.uk |
4 ohm watts and 8 ohm watts
Don Pearce wrote:
What would be its likely stereo output into 8 ohms? Those numbers don't quite stack up, but you will get something like 120W per channel - perhaps a bit more. Sounds fine to me. -- Wally www.artbywally.com/FiatPandaRally/index.htm www.wally.myby.co.uk |
4 ohm watts and 8 ohm watts
harrogate2 wrote:
What would be its likely stereo output into 8 ohms? It should be 125W per chan - and 230W into 4R indicates that it propably has a good power supply as well. The blurb says it as a 'high current' toroidal transformer. What it does not show however is the conditions under which the power measurements were taken, or the current driving capability of the outputs, so one channel into 8R might actually do rather more than 125W. I think that sort of power is probably well beyond what I need, which, I suspect, is a good thing. I'll reserve judgement until the tech specs appear, however. -- Wally www.artbywally.com/FiatPandaRally/index.htm www.wally.myby.co.uk |
4 ohm watts and 8 ohm watts
On Sun, 10 Apr 2005 16:38:03 GMT, "Wally" wrote:
Stewart Pinkerton wrote: What would be its likely stereo output into 8 ohms? Likely to be about 130 watts/channel into 8 ohms, but that alone doesn't make it a good amplifier................... Didn't say it did. :-) It's another Behringer jobbie. Although I have little to go on, other than other people's opinions of their kit, and my experience of the active crossover, I'm gravitating towards the idea that their stuff might just be rather good. No techy specs as yet, but here's the spiel from their web site (note that it isn't available yet, so this is essentially marketing blurb)... An odd spec, since 230w/channel into 4 ohms should equate to 460 watts bridged into 8 ohms, not 500 watts. The absence of a fan is a plus for home use, but note that pro amps are often run at much higher average levels than you'll use at home, so you really do need to check that this unit sounds good at a watt or so, which is a typical home average level. Pro amps, while they *can* sound good, are designed with cool running and reliability as first priorities, not sheer sound quality. Despite some 'knocking copy' you may have heard from the so-called 'subjectivists' on this subject, it's not actually true that *all* amplifiers sound the same! :-) -- Stewart Pinkerton | Music is Art - Audio is Engineering |
4 ohm watts and 8 ohm watts
In article ,
Wally wrote: It's another Behringer jobbie. Although I have little to go on, other than other people's opinions of their kit, and my experience of the active crossover, I'm gravitating towards the idea that their stuff might just be rather good. It's reasonable value for money. Let's leave it at that. ;-) -- *Why is it that doctors call what they do "practice"? Dave Plowman London SW To e-mail, change noise into sound. |
4 ohm watts and 8 ohm watts
Stewart Pinkerton wrote:
An odd spec, since 230w/channel into 4 ohms should equate to 460 watts bridged into 8 ohms, not 500 watts. Aye. Maybe they've bumped up the 8 ohm bridged performance to get a nice round number for the model name. The absence of a fan is a plus for home use, but note that pro amps are often run at much higher average levels than you'll use at home, so you really do need to check that this unit sounds good at a watt or so, which is a typical home average level. Yup. I'll be interested to see what its s/n spec is. Pro amps, while they *can* sound good, are designed with cool running and reliability as first priorities, not sheer sound quality. Maybe so, but how far downwards can the quality go, if they are to get away with calling it a 'reference class studio monitor'? The other two power amps in their range (more powerful) aren't described the same - I get the impression that they're more like live sound reinforcement amps, so I doubt if this new one is going to be a pishy, buttered-up PA blast-box. Despite some 'knocking copy' you may have heard from the so-called 'subjectivists' on this subject, it's not actually true that *all* amplifiers sound the same! :-) I can happily take that stuff with a half pound tub of Saxa... :-) -- Wally www.artbywally.com/FiatPandaRally/index.htm www.wally.myby.co.uk |
All times are GMT. The time now is 10:45 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.0.0
Copyright ©2004-2006 AudioBanter.co.uk