"Dave Plowman" wrote in message
...
In article ,
Ray Keattch wrote:
If their description of the bass 'being really deep' on your record
player, but not on your CD, one is faulty - forget any nuances. If it
happens on all nominally the same recordings.


Neither the CD or deck are flawed.

Given your hate of anything technical, how would you know?

So where do you want to go with this one? Would it help if I invited you to
my place to satisfy you my system isn't flawed? Quite simple really. The CD
sounds good and the deck sounds good. It takes a while to tune in to a
different format.

Mr Plowman, your being a tit for the sake of trolling.

MrBitsy.

"Ray Keattch" wrote in message
...

"Dave Plowman" wrote in message
...
In article ,

Ray Keattch wrote:
If their description of the bass 'being really deep' on your record
player, but not on your CD, one is faulty - forget any nuances. If
it
happens on all nominally the same recordings.

Neither the CD or deck are flawed.

Given your hate of anything technical, how would you know?

So where do you want to go with this one?

Speaks to state of mind.

Would it help if I invited you to
my place to satisfy you my system isn't flawed? Quite simple really. The
CD
sounds good and the deck sounds good. It takes a while to tune in to a
different format.

Mr Plowman, your being a tit for the sake of trolling.

You're obviously perceptually deaf to the coloration, noise and distortion
that is inherent in LP playback.

In article ,
Ray Keattch wrote:
Neither the CD or deck are flawed.

Given your hate of anything technical, how would you know?

So where do you want to go with this one? Would it help if I invited you
to my place to satisfy you my system isn't flawed? Quite simple really.
The CD sounds good and the deck sounds good. It takes a while to tune in
to a different format.

Mr Plowman, your being a tit for the sake of trolling.

I'd suggest you train your ears - or those of your children - how to
recognise and describe sound artifacts. If the bass *really* does sound
substantially different between an LP and a CD, then it could easily be
measured, and the reason found out as to why. But I'd guess at a
pickup/arm resonance. Which any caring vinyl enthusiast would try to fix.

But like I said you don't understand - or want to understand - such things.

As for trolling, I'm not the one originating all these threads on a vinyl
only group, and would welcome it if only to get shot of those who can't
admit to its flaws. From those who appreciate old technology, and wish to
get the very best of it, I personally love to read things. 'Cause I'm
interested in this as well, but not blind to its flaws.

--
*Work is for people who don't know how to fish.

Dave Plowman London SW 12
RIP Acorn