A Audio, hi-fi and car audio  forum. Audio Banter

Go Back   Home » Audio Banter forum » UK Audio Newsgroups » uk.rec.audio (General Audio and Hi-Fi)
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

uk.rec.audio (General Audio and Hi-Fi) (uk.rec.audio) Discussion and exchange of hi-fi audio equipment.

Purchase question



 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #41 (permalink)  
Old May 21st 05, 10:38 AM posted to alt.audio.equipment,rec.audio,rec.audio.opinion,uk.rec.audio
Arny Krueger
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 3,850
Default Purchase question


"Fred" wrote in message
...
(I'd trade hiss for LP's defects anyday)


I use a software from MAGiX to remove most of the hiss

from tapes. It could
also remove most of the pops, clicks and scratches from

LPs. If I remember
correctly dbx is pretty good in removing much of the hiss

if you have that
feature on your tape deck.

The analog laser turntable from Japan would remove all the

LP defects that
you would have form a conventional turntable.


I heard said turntable at HE2005. It sounded good, but it
did not remove all of the audible defects of the LP format.
It's an archivists' tool.


  #43 (permalink)  
Old May 21st 05, 11:51 AM posted to alt.audio.equipment,rec.audio,rec.audio.opinion,uk.rec.audio
dave weil
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 149
Default Purchase question

On Sat, 21 May 2005 06:38:53 -0400, "Arny Krueger"
wrote:


"Fred" wrote in message
...
(I'd trade hiss for LP's defects anyday)


I use a software from MAGiX to remove most of the hiss

from tapes. It could
also remove most of the pops, clicks and scratches from

LPs. If I remember
correctly dbx is pretty good in removing much of the hiss

if you have that
feature on your tape deck.

The analog laser turntable from Japan would remove all the

LP defects that
you would have form a conventional turntable.


I heard said turntable at HE2005. It sounded good, but it
did not remove all of the audible defects of the LP format.
It's an archivists' tool.


Where are the dbts?
  #44 (permalink)  
Old May 21st 05, 05:16 PM posted to alt.audio.equipment,rec.audio,rec.audio.opinion,uk.rec.audio
Joseph Oberlander
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 57
Default Purchase question



Arny Krueger wrote:

I heard said turntable at HE2005. It sounded good, but it
did not remove all of the audible defects of the LP format.
It's an archivists' tool.


For so much money that I could set up a small home recording
studio. Or buy a small car. No thanks.

  #45 (permalink)  
Old May 21st 05, 06:26 PM posted to alt.audio.equipment,rec.audio.opinion,uk.rec.audio
George M. Middius
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 121
Default Purchase question



Joseph O'Blather keeps the class warfare fires burning.

For so much money that I could set up a small home recording
studio. Or buy a small car. No thanks.


Not to worry, O'Blather. It's not being marketed to the likes of you. Why
would you even consider buying a $20,000 turntable if you can't afford it?
Or more to the point, why do you have to remind us it's beyond your means?
You don't see the rest of us whining about what we can't afford. (Except for
Krooger, but of course Arnii is one of Them, not one of us.)





  #46 (permalink)  
Old May 22nd 05, 09:47 AM posted to alt.audio.equipment,rec.audio.opinion,uk.rec.audio
Tim Martin
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 170
Default Purchase question


"Don Pearce" wrote in message
...
On Sat, 21 May 2005 08:40:25 GMT, "Tim Martin"
wrote:


"Joseph Oberlander" wrote in message
nk.net...

it's
hard to get a clean FM signal these days without some
compression or fading and so on(especially if you are
in a hilly area)


That must depend on what country you live in.

Tim


I'm not sure that radio is that geopolitically aware.


No, but regulation, funding, and service is.

As I understand it, a high-quality radio tuner needs a 200 micro-volt aerial
signal to achieve a 60db signal-to-noise ratio. I also understand that in
the UK, BBC FM radio transmittters and repeaters are sited to deliver a 300
microvolt aerial signal within the service area, based on a two-element
aerial at a height of 10 metres above ground, with 15 metres of co-ax
downlead.

The stated service coverage is 98% for stereo reception, 100% for mono. I
wouldn't describe that as "hard to get".

For anyone interested, here's a list of BBC transmitters

http://mysite.wanadoo-members.co.uk/...C_national.pdf

Tim


  #47 (permalink)  
Old May 22nd 05, 11:01 AM posted to alt.audio.equipment,rec.audio.opinion,uk.rec.audio
Don Pearce
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,412
Default Purchase question


On Sun, 22 May 2005 09:47:00 GMT, "Tim Martin"
wrote:


"Don Pearce" wrote in message
...
On Sat, 21 May 2005 08:40:25 GMT, "Tim Martin"
wrote:


"Joseph Oberlander" wrote in message
nk.net...

it's
hard to get a clean FM signal these days without some
compression or fading and so on(especially if you are
in a hilly area)

That must depend on what country you live in.

Tim


I'm not sure that radio is that geopolitically aware.


No, but regulation, funding, and service is.

As I understand it, a high-quality radio tuner needs a 200 micro-volt aerial
signal to achieve a 60db signal-to-noise ratio. I also understand that in
the UK, BBC FM radio transmittters and repeaters are sited to deliver a 300
microvolt aerial signal within the service area, based on a two-element
aerial at a height of 10 metres above ground, with 15 metres of co-ax
downlead.

The stated service coverage is 98% for stereo reception, 100% for mono. I
wouldn't describe that as "hard to get".

For anyone interested, here's a list of BBC transmitters

http://mysite.wanadoo-members.co.uk/...C_national.pdf

Tim


Sure, but how many people have such an antenna installation? Very few
indeed. Most people have the twinax dipole that came with the tuner
coiled up on the floor behind the rest of the hi fi. If they are
really keen, they may have stretched it out.

d

Pearce Consulting
http://www.pearce.uk.com
  #48 (permalink)  
Old May 22nd 05, 10:10 PM posted to alt.audio.equipment,rec.audio.opinion,uk.rec.audio
Dave Plowman (News)
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 5,872
Default Purchase question

In article ,
George M. Middius wrote:
Joseph O'Blather keeps the class warfare fires burning.


For so much money that I could set up a small home recording studio.
Or buy a small car. No thanks.


Not to worry, O'Blather. It's not being marketed to the likes of you.
Why would you even consider buying a $20,000 turntable if you can't
afford it? Or more to the point, why do you have to remind us it's
beyond your means? You don't see the rest of us whining about what we
can't afford. (Except for Krooger, but of course Arnii is one of Them,
not one of us.)


Good grief. An Merkin ****** posting from his trailer home to a uk group.
Nice to see you George M. In the UK most would spend their money on
important things.

--
*Ambition is a poor excuse for not having enough sense to be lazy *

Dave Plowman London SW
To e-mail, change noise into sound.
  #49 (permalink)  
Old May 22nd 05, 10:58 PM posted to alt.audio.equipment,rec.audio.opinion,uk.rec.audio
George M. Middius
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 121
Default Purchase question



Dave Plowborg still hasn't cracked the poverty barrier.

Not to worry, O'Blather. It's not being marketed to the likes of you.
Why would you even consider buying a $20,000 turntable if you can't
afford it? Or more to the point, why do you have to remind us it's
beyond your means? You don't see the rest of us whining about what we
can't afford. (Except for Krooger, but of course Arnii is one of Them,
not one of us.)


Nice to see you George M. In the UK most would spend their money on
important things.


Still spending your dole on ale for the mates?




  #50 (permalink)  
Old May 22nd 05, 11:22 PM posted to alt.audio.equipment,rec.audio.opinion,uk.rec.audio
Nath
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 168
Default Purchase question


"George M. Middius" wrote in message
...


Dave Plowborg still hasn't cracked the poverty barrier.

Not to worry, O'Blather. It's not being marketed to the likes of you.
Why would you even consider buying a $20,000 turntable if you can't
afford it? Or more to the point, why do you have to remind us it's
beyond your means? You don't see the rest of us whining about what we
can't afford. (Except for Krooger, but of course Arnii is one of Them,
not one of us.)


Nice to see you George M. In the UK most would spend their money on
important things.


Still spending your dole on ale for the mates?


At least we have real beer, not your **** flavoured attempt at it...


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT. The time now is 06:24 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.SEO by vBSEO 3.0.0
Copyright ©2004-2025 Audio Banter.
The comments are property of their posters.