
May 21st 05, 10:38 AM
posted to alt.audio.equipment,rec.audio,rec.audio.opinion,uk.rec.audio
|
|
Purchase question
"Fred" wrote in message
...
(I'd trade hiss for LP's defects anyday)
I use a software from MAGiX to remove most of the hiss
from tapes. It could
also remove most of the pops, clicks and scratches from
LPs. If I remember
correctly dbx is pretty good in removing much of the hiss
if you have that
feature on your tape deck.
The analog laser turntable from Japan would remove all the
LP defects that
you would have form a conventional turntable.
I heard said turntable at HE2005. It sounded good, but it
did not remove all of the audible defects of the LP format.
It's an archivists' tool.
|

May 21st 05, 11:49 AM
posted to alt.audio.equipment,rec.audio.opinion,uk.rec.audio
|
|
Purchase question
|

May 21st 05, 11:51 AM
posted to alt.audio.equipment,rec.audio,rec.audio.opinion,uk.rec.audio
|
|
Purchase question
On Sat, 21 May 2005 06:38:53 -0400, "Arny Krueger"
wrote:
"Fred" wrote in message
...
(I'd trade hiss for LP's defects anyday)
I use a software from MAGiX to remove most of the hiss
from tapes. It could
also remove most of the pops, clicks and scratches from
LPs. If I remember
correctly dbx is pretty good in removing much of the hiss
if you have that
feature on your tape deck.
The analog laser turntable from Japan would remove all the
LP defects that
you would have form a conventional turntable.
I heard said turntable at HE2005. It sounded good, but it
did not remove all of the audible defects of the LP format.
It's an archivists' tool.
Where are the dbts?
|

May 21st 05, 05:16 PM
posted to alt.audio.equipment,rec.audio,rec.audio.opinion,uk.rec.audio
|
|
Purchase question
Arny Krueger wrote:
I heard said turntable at HE2005. It sounded good, but it
did not remove all of the audible defects of the LP format.
It's an archivists' tool.
For so much money that I could set up a small home recording
studio. Or buy a small car. No thanks.
|

May 21st 05, 06:26 PM
posted to alt.audio.equipment,rec.audio.opinion,uk.rec.audio
|
|
Purchase question
Joseph O'Blather keeps the class warfare fires burning.
For so much money that I could set up a small home recording
studio. Or buy a small car. No thanks.
Not to worry, O'Blather. It's not being marketed to the likes of you. Why
would you even consider buying a $20,000 turntable if you can't afford it?
Or more to the point, why do you have to remind us it's beyond your means?
You don't see the rest of us whining about what we can't afford. (Except for
Krooger, but of course Arnii is one of Them, not one of us.)
|

May 22nd 05, 09:47 AM
posted to alt.audio.equipment,rec.audio.opinion,uk.rec.audio
|
|
Purchase question
"Don Pearce" wrote in message
...
On Sat, 21 May 2005 08:40:25 GMT, "Tim Martin"
wrote:
"Joseph Oberlander" wrote in message
nk.net...
it's
hard to get a clean FM signal these days without some
compression or fading and so on(especially if you are
in a hilly area)
That must depend on what country you live in.
Tim
I'm not sure that radio is that geopolitically aware.
No, but regulation, funding, and service is.
As I understand it, a high-quality radio tuner needs a 200 micro-volt aerial
signal to achieve a 60db signal-to-noise ratio. I also understand that in
the UK, BBC FM radio transmittters and repeaters are sited to deliver a 300
microvolt aerial signal within the service area, based on a two-element
aerial at a height of 10 metres above ground, with 15 metres of co-ax
downlead.
The stated service coverage is 98% for stereo reception, 100% for mono. I
wouldn't describe that as "hard to get".
For anyone interested, here's a list of BBC transmitters
http://mysite.wanadoo-members.co.uk/...C_national.pdf
Tim
|

May 22nd 05, 11:01 AM
posted to alt.audio.equipment,rec.audio.opinion,uk.rec.audio
|
|
Purchase question
On Sun, 22 May 2005 09:47:00 GMT, "Tim Martin"
wrote:
"Don Pearce" wrote in message
...
On Sat, 21 May 2005 08:40:25 GMT, "Tim Martin"
wrote:
"Joseph Oberlander" wrote in message
nk.net...
it's
hard to get a clean FM signal these days without some
compression or fading and so on(especially if you are
in a hilly area)
That must depend on what country you live in.
Tim
I'm not sure that radio is that geopolitically aware.
No, but regulation, funding, and service is.
As I understand it, a high-quality radio tuner needs a 200 micro-volt aerial
signal to achieve a 60db signal-to-noise ratio. I also understand that in
the UK, BBC FM radio transmittters and repeaters are sited to deliver a 300
microvolt aerial signal within the service area, based on a two-element
aerial at a height of 10 metres above ground, with 15 metres of co-ax
downlead.
The stated service coverage is 98% for stereo reception, 100% for mono. I
wouldn't describe that as "hard to get".
For anyone interested, here's a list of BBC transmitters
http://mysite.wanadoo-members.co.uk/...C_national.pdf
Tim
Sure, but how many people have such an antenna installation? Very few
indeed. Most people have the twinax dipole that came with the tuner
coiled up on the floor behind the rest of the hi fi. If they are
really keen, they may have stretched it out.
d
Pearce Consulting
http://www.pearce.uk.com
|

May 22nd 05, 10:10 PM
posted to alt.audio.equipment,rec.audio.opinion,uk.rec.audio
|
|
Purchase question
In article ,
George M. Middius wrote:
Joseph O'Blather keeps the class warfare fires burning.
For so much money that I could set up a small home recording studio.
Or buy a small car. No thanks.
Not to worry, O'Blather. It's not being marketed to the likes of you.
Why would you even consider buying a $20,000 turntable if you can't
afford it? Or more to the point, why do you have to remind us it's
beyond your means? You don't see the rest of us whining about what we
can't afford. (Except for Krooger, but of course Arnii is one of Them,
not one of us.)
Good grief. An Merkin ****** posting from his trailer home to a uk group.
Nice to see you George M. In the UK most would spend their money on
important things.
--
*Ambition is a poor excuse for not having enough sense to be lazy *
Dave Plowman London SW
To e-mail, change noise into sound.
|

May 22nd 05, 10:58 PM
posted to alt.audio.equipment,rec.audio.opinion,uk.rec.audio
|
|
Purchase question
Dave Plowborg still hasn't cracked the poverty barrier.
Not to worry, O'Blather. It's not being marketed to the likes of you.
Why would you even consider buying a $20,000 turntable if you can't
afford it? Or more to the point, why do you have to remind us it's
beyond your means? You don't see the rest of us whining about what we
can't afford. (Except for Krooger, but of course Arnii is one of Them,
not one of us.)
Nice to see you George M. In the UK most would spend their money on
important things.
Still spending your dole on ale for the mates?
|

May 22nd 05, 11:22 PM
posted to alt.audio.equipment,rec.audio.opinion,uk.rec.audio
|
|
Purchase question
"George M. Middius" wrote in message
...
Dave Plowborg still hasn't cracked the poverty barrier.
Not to worry, O'Blather. It's not being marketed to the likes of you.
Why would you even consider buying a $20,000 turntable if you can't
afford it? Or more to the point, why do you have to remind us it's
beyond your means? You don't see the rest of us whining about what we
can't afford. (Except for Krooger, but of course Arnii is one of Them,
not one of us.)
Nice to see you George M. In the UK most would spend their money on
important things.
Still spending your dole on ale for the mates?
At least we have real beer, not your **** flavoured attempt at it...
|
Thread Tools |
|
Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
|