"Stewart Pinkerton" wrote in message
...
On 14 Mar 2006 18:01:50 -0800, "Warm Blue Glow"
wrote:

From: Keith G
Date: Tues, Mar 14 2006 7:11 pm
Email: "Keith G"

Too much crossposting - *Binned and removed*...

Too much crossposting - *Binned and removed*...

LOL! We can do this indefinitely...

Too much crossposting - *Binned and removed*...



That's the ticket!!

:-))

Bin 'em all, I say!!

"Clyde Slick" wrote in message
. ..

"Keith G" wrote in message
news

"Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!" wrote in
message oups.com...
From: Andre Jute
Date: Tues, Mar 14 2006 11:52 am
Email: "Andre Jute"

Let's see who apologizes and who adds abuse to the nauseating
insensitivity and appallingly poor manners they have already displayed
for 10 days and 128 messages

Well, I also posted to the thread when it said that Pinkerton was
unreliable (started by you, it appears).

So if I apologize to you, I must then also apologize to Stewart. Since
he likes and eats haggis, I'm afraid that isn't possible. I've had
haggis and it's disgusting.

I would also point out that you, to be fair, should probably apologize
to Stewart for negatively dragging his name into a thread title, which
could also be called 'insensitive.' Goose, gander, and all.

So, even though I do not pay much attention to thread titles (like most
here, I'd imagine), since I have posted to both threads, and since I
will not apologize to a haggis-eater, I guess that means you'd better
put me in with the trailer park trash. TIA...:-)



Too much crossposting - *Binned and removed*...


It's a good thing we don't have to use paper.


Yecch!! You don't use your bare hands, do you?

"Andre Jute" wrote in message
oups.com...

Jenn wrote:
In article .com,
"Andre Jute" wrote:

Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason! wrote:
From: Andre Jute
Date: Tues, Mar 14 2006 11:52 am
Email: "Andre Jute"

Let's see who apologizes and who adds abuse to the nauseating
insensitivity and appallingly poor manners they have already
displayed
for 10 days and 128 messages

Well, I also posted to the thread when it said that Pinkerton was
unreliable (started by you, it appears).

Absolutely. But that was a reasoned, documented case.

So if I apologize to you, I must then also apologize to Stewart.
Since
he likes and eats haggis, I'm afraid that isn't possible. I've had
haggis and it's disgusting.

I would also point out that you, to be fair, should probably
apologize
to Stewart for negatively dragging his name into a thread title,
which
could also be called 'insensitive.' Goose, gander, and all.

A reasoned, documented, proven case, made by me; I didn't just call
Pinkerton malicious, I *proved* that he is malicious.

The case with you is different. You carelessly contributed to a thread
in which I was accused of being a liar. snip

You are not thinking logically. You excuse YOUR action where you
ACTUALLY accuse a poster of bad behavior in the title of a post, but
accuse Shhhhh and me of being "insensitive" because we replied to posts
that had NOTHING to do with you at all. Think it though, my friend, and
stop looking foolish.

I don't know who taught you logic, Jenn, but you should ask for your
tuition back. They either did a very bad job, or you are terrifyingly
stupid, or your memory of what you were taught is faulty.

I deliberately made a case about Stewart Pinkerton and proved it with
documentation. I intended maximum offense to a clown who spent fifteen
months trying to wreck a project of mine for no better reason than his
malice. The documentation proves his malice.

You carelessly signed your name *8 times* to a headline accusing me of
being a liar, apparently without knowing me. If you cannot see how
offensive that is, you and I have nothing in common. Please don't call
me "my friend"; my friends are well-mannered people and you're not.

I think that, in the absence of an instant apology, this conversation
should have been over three exchanges ago. Your behaviour before and
since is inexcusable. Goodbye.



Ooh! Have you binned him??

:-)

"Clyde Slick" wrote in message
. ..

"Keith G" wrote in message
...

wrote in message
oups.com...

Andre Jute wrote:
uk.rec.audio, rec.audio.opinion and rec.audio.tubes are newsgroups
populated by self-declared audiophiles.
Snip,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,...,.,..,.,.,.,.,.,,.,.,.,.,. ,.,.,.,..,.,.,.,.,.
Let's see who apologizes and who adds abuse to the nauseating
insensitivity and appallingly poor manners they have already displayed
for 10 days and 128 messages.


There's a new refuge from all this over at Oz.Hi-Fi & HT:-

http://forum.aushifi.com

A moderated forum that, even though only a few days old, is really
taking off.
Sane, on topic and non-abusive posts are welcome. Others will be
cut-off with alacrity.
We look forward to seeing many of you over there .
Netpsychos still have usenet to play in to their hearts content so
let's leave em behind.


Oz



Too much crossposting - *Binned and removed*...


I'm with you, I'm doing my part.
I'm helping



No worries, it went wrong anyway....

"Andre Jute" wrote in message
ups.com...

paul packer wrote:
On 14 Mar 2006 21:16:05 -0800, "Andre Jute" wrote:

As I trundle off to my bath and thence to bed, the score stands at:

Decency 1, Sewer Habitues 19

Well, Andre, I think you deserve sincere congratulations for getting
nyob and Middius to finally agree about something. It may never happen
again, and only a true genius could have arranged it as neatly as you
did. They were hardly even aware it was happening.

I would also like to make a request to all the contributors to this
thread to stop throwing themselves against your ankles. It's getting
embarrassing.

I chuckled at your irony, but I laughed aloud at the mindless pomposity
and stupidity of the clowns that were caught in your trap. You don't do
so badly either, Paulie, at trolling spiky inedibles. God, some of
these people must be a grim drain on the patience of their families.


Oooh, more irony.

Hi,

"Keith G" wrote in message
...

Btw, a little old lady was struggling to pull a heavy shopping trolley up
the hill outside earlier on - I rushed out and stopped her (not hard - I put
my foot on the trolley wheel and she was ****t). I asked her what she
thought of your score so far - she said 'Andre Jute? Take no notice of him,
he's ****'n mental....!'

You've met Doris then? She gets about a bit, that old girl.

Glenn.

"Keith G" wrote in message
...

Ooh! Have you binned him??

****, Keith. I've had this in the kill bin, and now you've
brought it back up again, and it's turned into a soap opera. I've
missed a couple of episodes, but the excitement rages on...

Someone bring me up to speed...

1. Did he lie?
2. Was there really child porn involved?
3. Did that amp really get built? Was it really all his own werk?
4. Who killed Cock Robin?
5. Did anyone apologise?
6. Did anyone lie? Does anyone care?
7. Was it a real matched pair?
8. Is it true...does vinyl really have infinite resolution? Wow.

Glenn.

"Glenn Booth" wrote in message
...

"Keith G" wrote in message
...

Ooh! Have you binned him??

****, Keith. I've had this in the kill bin, and now you've
brought it back up again, and it's turned into a soap opera. I've
missed a couple of episodes, but the excitement rages on...

Someone bring me up to speed...


OK, I've been killing it as well but it's like all soaps - you only need to
see the cover of a ****e TV listings mag and you're up to speed on all of
them for the coming year! So I'll fill you in:


1. Did he lie?


Yes, incessantly.


2. Was there really child porn involved?


No.


3. Did that amp really get built?


No.


Was it really all his own werk?


See previous.


4. Who killed Cock Robin?


OK, dammit - I did, but trust me, there was a good reason...



5. Did anyone apologise?


Do they ever?


6. Did anyone lie?


Yes.


Does anyone care?


No.


7. Was it a real matched pair?


No - as always, the left one was just that little bit bigger...


8. Is it true...does vinyl really have infinite resolution?


Yes.


Wow.


Wow indeed! ;-)

On 16 Mar 2006 10:04:04 -0800, "Andre Jute" wrote:


paul packer wrote:
On 14 Mar 2006 21:16:05 -0800, "Andre Jute" wrote:

As I trundle off to my bath and thence to bed, the score stands at:

Decency 1, Sewer Habitues 19

Well, Andre, I think you deserve sincere congratulations for getting
nyob and Middius to finally agree about something. It may never happen
again, and only a true genius could have arranged it as neatly as you
did. They were hardly even aware it was happening.

I would also like to make a request to all the contributors to this
thread to stop throwing themselves against your ankles. It's getting
embarrassing.

I chuckled at your irony, but I laughed aloud at the mindless pomposity
and stupidity of the clowns that were caught in your trap. You don't do
so badly either, Paulie, at trolling spiky inedibles. God, some of
these people must be a grim drain on the patience of their families.

Andre Jute

Yes, Andre, you've caught me out. I was indeed being entirely ironic,
but I must now back-pedal and give you credit for picking up on what
so many others missed. I expected no better from Arny, who misses most
buses as they pass the stop, but Mr. Peter Wieck is usually sharper
(notwithstanding your opinion to the contrary); something has recently
dulled his edge.

On a more serious note, I'm surprised at your current obsession with
punishing those who inmnocently posted to the "Jute is a liar" thread.

People often reply to posts without even looking at the thread title;
you can't seriously accuse them of endorsing that thread title just by
posting. Or is that a subtle troll too, and now I've been caught?

paul packer wrote:
On 16 Mar 2006 10:04:04 -0800, "Andre Jute" wrote:


paul packer wrote:
On 14 Mar 2006 21:16:05 -0800, "Andre Jute" wrote:

As I trundle off to my bath and thence to bed, the score stands at:

Decency 1, Sewer Habitues 19

Well, Andre, I think you deserve sincere congratulations for getting
nyob and Middius to finally agree about something. It may never happen
again, and only a true genius could have arranged it as neatly as you
did. They were hardly even aware it was happening.

I would also like to make a request to all the contributors to this
thread to stop throwing themselves against your ankles. It's getting
embarrassing.

I chuckled at your irony, but I laughed aloud at the mindless pomposity
and stupidity of the clowns that were caught in your trap. You don't do
so badly either, Paulie, at trolling spiky inedibles. God, some of
these people must be a grim drain on the patience of their families.

Andre Jute

Yes, Andre, you've caught me out. I was indeed being entirely ironic,
but I must now back-pedal and give you credit for picking up on what
so many others missed. I expected no better from Arny, who misses most
buses as they pass the stop, but Mr. Peter Wieck is usually sharper
(notwithstanding your opinion to the contrary); something has recently
dulled his edge.

Witless Wiecky has been associating with the Magnequest Scum. They're
feeding him his lines; he's their surrogate and I suppose he fondly
imagines he's on my arse. Dream on, Witless. I didn't know Witless when
he was sharper, if he ever was, which I doubt. I read him for about a
month around about the new year, decided he is dumber than the rear
half of the earthworm after the spade cut it in two, and stopped
bothering with him. I like people who know something I want to know, or
if ignorant, like you (well, okay, you probably just know the same
things I do), are amusing and literate and quick. The world is full of
frowning fools who are a waste of skin and oxygen, like Witless Wiecky;
someone else can read their posts.

On a more serious note, I'm surprised at your current obsession with
punishing those who inmnocently posted to the "Jute is a liar" thread.

Some of those clowns aren't innocent, as you have it. Don Pearce, a
prime flamethrower, let on that he kept going a thread with a headline
calling me a liar in order to do maximum damage. Pearce is notorious
for bashing anyone who points out that his slimy and incompetent pal
Pinkerton is slimy and incompetent. Professional solidarity taken to
that length arouses suspicion about the competence and motivation of
the excessive one, in this case Pearce. But I became bored with the
dull jerks before I got around to giving Don-baby a thread of his own.
He'll be in my face again -- it is in his nature -- and I'll take care
of him then.

But, in general, I started that thread for two reasons:

1. I am seriously ****ed off with the poor manners of people on the
net. Geez, I mean, poor manners deliberately perpeprated as a message
to scum is one thing, poor manners because you appear not to know
better? Ugh. I really wonder what sort of homes more than half the
people on UKRA and RAO came out of. I wasn't joking about trailer park
trash.

2. To demonstrate to Keefie G that when he tries to turn RAT into a
toilet by pointing Stinkerton at us, I repay the impertinence with
interest. In Google, late in the year before last, you will find the
clowns on UKRA creaming themselves at how clever they are in sending us
Pinkerton. A couple of months later you will find me asking them
politely to take Pinkerton back, or else; they thought I was being
amusing. We've arrived at or else. Before I finish, Keefie G will be
screaming to the high heavens in frustration. For now he's given up and
joined the thread...

People often reply to posts without even looking at the thread title;
you can't seriously accuse them of endorsing that thread title just by
posting.

I don't care **** what tenth-raters think of me. I care that they
didn't think about what they said a thread with my name in the
headline. Some of their comments were intrinsically stupid. It's
impertinent to say something stupid in a thread with my name in the
headline. That's a good reason to give them each a good sharp kick in
the goolies. But, as we've seen, most of them are dickless, and some of
them like Jenn are terrifying stupid, self-centered, unaware of their
surroundings, insensitive and obdurate; I doubt Jenn learned anything
from his exchange with me.

Or is that a subtle troll too, and now I've been caught?

What do you think?

Andre Jute
The abyss looks also into you -- Friedrich Nietzsche