![]() |
Mains filters
In ,
Jim Lesurf typed: In article , Jo wrote: In , Arny Krueger typed: Most power amps already have chokes in series with their output terminals. As they should. The Texan didn't. A snag here is that some designers feel that an output choke increases the HF o/p impedance and degrades the sound. Classic example being the older Naim power amp designs which just used a 0.22 Ohm resistor... ... and then may require about 10microH of lead inductance to be stable. :-) Yes, this brings us back into the topic of "but can humans really hear the difference ?" that occupies many threads. I wonder how much extra impedance is added to the output circuit at audio frequencies by the addition of RF chokes ? The formula for inductive reactance is simple and for a 100uH choke I get: XL=1.3K at 2MHz and 13 Ohms at 20KHz which would seem to be a significant contribution to the impedance of an amp output circuit... ....BUT if a decent common mode type bifilar wound filter choke is used the effective inductance in the speaker circuit would be much less than this and so any degradation of the audio signal would be negligible....or would it :-) Jo |
Mains filters
In article , tony sayer
wrote: In article , Jim Lesurf jcgl@st- and.demon.co.uk writes Well TAXIS are FM these days and you wont hear them, you might get a bit of hum. Old bill is fast going off to Airwave TETRA and you will not hear him at all!... You may do,,, ;- The TETRA mobiles are pulsed, so may produce AM envelope demod of the data pulses if they find enough nonlinearity in a suitable place. If U reckon U can decode the TETRA old bills using Jim, then there would be a lot of people very interested in that!.... Afraid I can't as I don't have the details of the encoding. But that isn't required simply to detect the pulse power envelope. :-) Indeed, you may recall some 'health scares' about TETRA that were fuelled by its pulse profile - although those who panicked at the time had the details wrong so were worrying about nothing much. If interested, have a look at http://www.st-and.demon.co.uk/temp/tetra.html Note that although the base stations probably don't normally pulse, the mobiles probably do, both to save energy and to reduce slot conflicts. The point of the above page was to show that 'health' worries about the *base stations* was probably groundless. Locally, we had all kinds of stories about 'Cows not giving milk', etc, when TETRA bases were installed - in fact before they came into actual acive use. :-) A distinction to be made is one that (surprisingly) in my experience often escapes people in the military, etc, who deal with encrypted or spread spectrum comms. The payload data may be unreadable, but the actual signals are easily detected, and often easily indentified in terms of class of system. Alas, it seems easy for people to assume that the information being encrypted as being the same as the actual transmission being undetectable. Tain't so. For the above reason you could, if you wished, easily detect when the Bill are transmitting and even say where from... Technically, not particularly difficult. Indeed, I've done this sort of thing for other (legal) reasons in the past... :-) Knowing what they are saying would be more difficult. For similar reasons, locating, jamming, etc, of mobiles is much easier than actually listening to the message payload/content. Slainte, Jim -- Electronics http://www.st-and.ac.uk/~www_pa/Scot...o/electron.htm Audio Misc http://www.st-and.demon.co.uk/AudioMisc/index.html Armstrong Audio http://www.st-and.demon.co.uk/Audio/armstrong.html Barbirolli Soc. http://www.st-and.demon.co.uk/JBSoc/JBSoc.html |
Mains filters
Serge Auckland wrote:
He had a Ferrograph F307 amplifier... Wow! I've got one of those sat up in the loft... picked it up for about a fiver at a car boot sale many years ago (came with an AM/FM tuner and a set of rather ropey speakers). Sounded lovely, until the PSU blew up... smoothing caps went and took out one of the bridge rectifiers. Managed to salvage a couple of much newer caps, same value, similar size, from a dead Cyrus amp (was terminal, beyond economic repair). Apart from the crackly volume pots it's still working fine. Lovely bit of kit, that was. -- Glenn Richards Tel: (01453) 845735 Squirrel Solutions http://www.squirrelsolutions.co.uk/ IT consultancy, hardware and software support, broadband installation |
Mains filters
Stewart Pinkerton wrote:
If your opinion is that filtering won't make a difference, state your opinion, avoid personal insults, and let civilised debate commence. It won't, if your gear has decent RFI rejection, as it certainly should. Moral of the tale - avoid 'high end' gear from back street companies with no real engineering ability. I'd hardly call Arcam a "back street company"... [usual tirade of personal insults snipped] Anyway, been doing some testing today with interesting results. Will write up a summary and post when I've got a bit more time to spare... -- Glenn Richards Tel: (01453) 845735 Squirrel Solutions http://www.squirrelsolutions.co.uk/ IT consultancy, hardware and software support, broadband installation |
Mains filters
"Jim Lesurf" wrote in message ... In article , Iain Churches wrote: Hello Glenn. A couple of days ago, I popped in for 30 secs to an audio demo at a local dealership to take him some audition material. He was demonstrating a mains filter unit. He had a tunable RF gadget with a small inbuilt speaker which he plugged into a wall socket. Radio transmissions and very loud hash could clearly be heard. Then he plugged the gadget into one of the filtered outlets. Silence. May be a very useful device if you happen to have such an RF detector/demodulator/amp connected to the mains and you want to cut down the noise it makes without bothering to unplug it. ;- The unit was about 4U in height, and had ten mains outlets on the rear panel. I was there for only a few seconds, (car parked on a yellow line) The dealer has promised me some literature. The gain, etc, of the device used to produce audible noises from the 'mains' might help.. . :-) AIUI though, most decent audio equipment isn't actually designed specifically to demodulate and amplify mains interference. Perhaps he avoided demoing with audio equipment as the main (pun) result might have been to warn people not to buy that specific item of equipment. :-) I think we had better not pursue this line, Jim. The power amp demonstrated was a Krell which was being compared with a Conrad Johnson. He phoned me this morning to say he took two orders for the CJ. Regards to all Iain |
Mains filters
Thus spake Jim Lesurf:
Snipped Indeed, you may recall some 'health scares' about TETRA that were fuelled by its pulse profile - although those who panicked at the time had the details wrong so were worrying about nothing much. If interested, have a look at http://www.st-and.demon.co.uk/temp/tetra.html Note that although the base stations probably don't normally pulse, the mobiles probably do, both to save energy and to reduce slot conflicts. The point of the above page was to show that 'health' worries about the *base stations* was probably groundless. Locally, we had all kinds of stories about 'Cows not giving milk', etc, when TETRA bases were installed - in fact before they came into actual acive use. :-) A friend was using Tetra radios as a constable on his beat in Skegness more or less from launch. He reported no personal health issues but related several anecdotal stories of scrambled brains. IIRC, the poorest aspect was the pass-through onto the mobile network wasn't brilliant therefore was easier to use his mobile. A distinction to be made is one that (surprisingly) in my experience often escapes people in the military, etc, who deal with encrypted or spread spectrum comms. The payload data may be unreadable, but the actual signals are easily detected, and often easily indentified in terms of class of system. Alas, it seems easy for people to assume that the information being encrypted as being the same as the actual transmission being undetectable. Tain't so. For the above reason you could, if you wished, easily detect when the Bill are transmitting and even say where from... Technically, not particularly difficult. Indeed, I've done this sort of thing for other (legal) reasons in the past... :-) Knowing what they are saying would be more difficult. For similar reasons, locating, jamming, etc, of mobiles is much easier than actually listening to the message payload/content. The current use of the radio spectrum of allocating certain frequencies to particular purposes makes it a no-brainer to know if that band is in use. However, if UWB/SDR/Cognitive Radio ever reaches the ether, it will be virtually impossible or very difficult to pull out military, emergency, mobile, TV etc, etc from one another, ever before one can even contemplate decrypting anything. If CR ever happens, it will be incremental, probably with holes all through the spectrum for non-hopping radio. I can't see a future humble radio hopping from DC to light either - just too expensive for the intended purpose. Propagation characteristics are hardly even from DC to light either. It will certainly make the whole spectrum a hell of a lot more efficient, once regulators & the military can grasp the concept of loosing fixed bands but retaining priority of use, security etc -- Basically, I hate people who preface nearly every sentence with the word 'basically'! |
Mains filters
Thus spake Arny Krueger:
Snipped The last time through, a low-cost reduced-sound-quality format won the reissue race: MP3. The moral of the story is that the much-demeaned CD format was actually overkill. Yup. The "you've never had it so good!" era of CDs (yes, I know this is disputed by a few) maybe a thing of the past where we all have to put up with 128k MP3s as the de facto standard & take a reduction in quality that 99% of consumers will be perfectly happy with. As for DVD-A or SACD, I've never seen them in a retail outlet - not that I frequent them that often as I prefer not to get ripped off. As for Blu-Ray or equivalents - region coding for music anyone? My Rotel will play HDCD discs but finding anything I want to actually listen too is the challenge. I guess at the licensing fee being to high - better to make a little money often than too much rarely. Goes to show that there's still room for capitalists with brains to understand their chosen market. As for the lost opportunity that digitised music could have brought to the music industry... |
All times are GMT. The time now is 01:58 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.0.0
Copyright ©2004-2006 AudioBanter.co.uk