![]() |
Mains filters
On Thu, 16 Mar 2006 10:47:44 +0000, Glenn Richards
wrote: Sadly there doesn't appear to be a uk.rec.hi-fi where those of us who can tell the difference between bell wire and 105-strand speaker cable can have a discussion about which cable sounds best with which equipment, without the likes of yourselves or Pinkerton (to name but two) chiming in with "********" or words to that effect. We've got uk.rec.audio.vinyl now, why not have uk.rec.audio.hi-fi or audiophile as well? If you want a private news group where you can promulgate your own audio mythology without fear of being called an idiot, I suggest you start it on your own hard drive, and keep it there. Spout your nonsense in a public forum, though, and expect to be called on it. Just stop crying for goodness sake - it isn't pretty. d Pearce Consulting http://www.pearce.uk.com |
Mains filters
To Tony. You're right. In recent years, the electricity companies have
installed fibre optic links, Energis.. IIRC used to carry FM broadcast and TV to transmitters. but I'm fairly sure that when they first started using this method of communicating amongst themselves, they did make use of the full distribution network, including the supergrid, but I may be wrong on that. How much power volts are on the line, shouldn't make any difference. It's still just a piece of wire, with HF skin effect, to the comms signal. I believe that with the PLT internet trials, the injection points were at central substations, so I guess that this must have been working at up to at least the local 11kV distribution level. Just as an aside, I think that the grid and supergrid operate at 275kV and 400kV, Yep 400 kV. Even so it would be interesting to see how they get the RF on and off the line;-!!! wouldn't go through the trannies too well unless they were using Russ A MK-IV snake oil of course;-)) not 475kV. I also have a dim recollection of reading somewhere, that the 25kV overhead lines on the uk rail nework, were also used for HF telemetry, but again, I could be going off on one there. Never heard of that?. Suffering from CRAFTs disease, don'tcha know ... !! d;~} Errmm hate to admit I do know;-0 Arfa -- Tony Sayer |
Mains filters
On 2006-03-16, Serge Auckland wrote:
"Iain Churches" wrote in message ... "Don Pearce" wrote in message ... On Thu, 16 Mar 2006 10:39:13 +0200, "Iain Churches" wrote: Hi Don. I have a feeling you are right. In many years of large recording sessions, with hundreds of cables and interconnects I have never seen a mains filter unit in use. A lot of Pro equipment includes a mains filter as part of the IEC mains socket. I have VDRs fitted to the plugs feeding all my audio and computer equipment, as I've found it helps reduce the number of unexplained lock-ups, when only a power cycle will unlock the kit. I only get one or two a year now, as opposed to one or two a month without them. I do live out in the sticks, so my supply may well have less urban hash on it, but possibly more surges. As an experiment I have been running my audio kit in recent years from a single supply point across which I have connected (IIRC): - A couple of 275 V VDRs in parallel between live and neutral; - A 220 nF class X2 capacitor from live to neitral; and - A pair of 22 nF class Y2 capacitors from live to earth and neutral to earth. Actually I am not aware of any audible difference that this makes compared to the direct connection. I currently am aware of no audible "splats" from line voltage anomalies but then again I was not aware of any beforehand. I was going to try adding inductances in series with L and N and bring the filter up to the normal IEC socket filter circuit but since I perceive no improvement from the above I am not inclined to get out the soldering iron. An experiment I recently tried was to burn a dithered -105 dBFS tone at 3 kHz onto a CD. I can hear that as well as the -93.3 dBFS dither noise if I turn up the gain to maximum. So the mains cannot be interfering with my kit to that extent anyway. -- John Phillips |
Mains filters
In article , Glenn Richards
writes tony sayer wrote: I've never ever had a problem with dodgy mains and audio equipment apart from a very many years ago now when early solid state amps were around and for that matter haven't been able to affect my system at all with locally generated RF fields, except with the exception of the QUAD ESL's where you can trigger the protection with an RF signal. Nice! The main reason I was asking... as I said in an earlier post, because I work from home I've got about a dozen PCs sitting in the next room, on the same ring main as the hi-fi. Which makes one wonder just how much crap is getting onto the mains. Quite a bit in fact the mains waveform can be a rather distorted and rarely these days will look like a sine wave, but its not causing any problems to me and I sleep soundly knowing that:) Anyway it undergoes quite some more distortion in the mains input circuits of the average power amp, gets flattened quite a bit;-) I would generally be of the opinion that if you've got a "normal" setup at home (one PC, turned on when needed) filtering etc probably wouldn't make a difference. But when you're sat next door to a scaled down version of Telehouse you probably do want some filtering. Several PC's and other gubbins.. I'm currently using a standard Masterplug 4-way surge strip for obvious reasons, but you can get an RFI filtered version for about £8 trade. Which is about 2 quid more than the unfiltered surge protected version, so as I'm going to need another surge strip shortly, I might well "risk" a couple of quid. If it doesn't make any difference, it doesn't matter, it's less than the cost of a pint. If it makes you feel better and you !!believe!! brother then spend, spend, spend, I'd prefer the pint:-)) Nope, its just another area where people like Russ A sell all manner of exotic junk to the feeble minded to con them out of their moolah, and if he gets away with it, more fool them!....... This is the problem with places like Russ Andrews. *If* upgrading the mains cable makes a difference, it'll be the filtered plug that does it. Which you can buy for a couple of quid, and fit to a standard IEC or figure 8 cable, or even chop off the moulded plug and fit to the captive lead on cheaper kit. Although if it's the filtering that makes the difference, just use one of those Masterplug surge/RFI strips and leave the moulded plug. Its all a load of bollockx and anyone who understands electricity can see that, but if some want to join the Russ A church, then it'll cost them cos its not for free!.. Like most religions.. but they make people feel better, tho not often happy... So you can get exactly the same improvement (if there is one - while I'm convinced on speaker cables and interconnects I'm still a little sceptical about power cables) with less than a tenner's worth of bits as you can with a £250 cable, how many bottles of snake oil are Russ Andrews bundling with that cable? Christ or Russ knows... The biggest problem with the snake oil merchants of course is that it makes everyone sceptical of what could possibly be a genuine improvement. Naturally. Does the National gird know that?.... -- Tony Sayer |
Mains filters
"Dave Plowman (News)" wrote in message ... In article , Don Pearce wrote: Turn your amplifier on, with no music playing and listen. Leave the volume control in the normal listening position and sit in your listening chair. What can you hear? Anything? Of course not. And what little hiss there is comes from the front end of the amplifier. None of it comes from the mains. You've never heard things like a fridge splat etc which is mains borne? Of course it depends on the design of the power supply in your amp, etc. I've got a dedicated radial circuit with its own earth feeding my AV equipment. -- *I used up all my sick days so I called in dead Dave Plowman London SW To e-mail, change noise into sound. If folk happen to have mains borne fridge splats etc. surely employ RC snubbers at the source (or if it really bad replace those burnt arcing contacts) rather than going to the expense of filtering the mains for the AV equipment. I borrowed some hi-fi branded mains filters - read expensive - before I had a dedicated circuit and in every case they either made no audible difference or they 'appeared' to be deleterious to the sound (sighted evaluations of course). Mike |
Mains filters
In article , Glenn Richards wrote:
Sadly there doesn't appear to be a uk.rec.hi-fi where those of us who can tell the difference between bell wire and 105-strand speaker cable can have a discussion about which cable sounds best with which equipment, without the likes of yourselves or Pinkerton (to name but two) chiming in with "********" or words to that effect. If you believe you can hear difference between audio cables, you should look for something along the lines of uk.rec.hi-fi.ignorant_self_delusion or start one yourself. Rod. |
Mains filters
In article , Dave Plowman (News) wrote:
Turn your amplifier on, with no music playing and listen. Leave the volume control in the normal listening position and sit in your listening chair. What can you hear? Anything? Of course not. And what little hiss there is comes from the front end of the amplifier. None of it comes from the mains. You've never heard things like a fridge splat etc which is mains borne? Of course it depends on the design of the power supply in your amp, etc. I've got a dedicated radial circuit with its own earth feeding my AV equipment. I've got all my electrical equipment plugged into the normal wiring that came with the house, no fancy filters anywhere, nothing special at all, and have never heard any splats from my loudspeakers since I stopped listening to AM radio. There's no audible hiss from a normal listening position either, even if I turn the volume control to its upper endstop. (Normal listening requires about a quarter turn). My audio and video equipment is not the sort of silly pretentious stuff that costs a king's ransom, and it's not cheap rubbish either, just carefully chosen well-designed gear that works. Rod. |
Mains filters
"tony sayer" wrote in message ... To Tony. You're right. In recent years, the electricity companies have installed fibre optic links, Energis.. IIRC used to carry FM broadcast and TV to transmitters. but I'm fairly sure that when they first started using this method of communicating amongst themselves, they did make use of the full distribution network, including the supergrid, but I may be wrong on that. How much power volts are on the line, shouldn't make any difference. It's still just a piece of wire, with HF skin effect, to the comms signal. I believe that with the PLT internet trials, the injection points were at central substations, so I guess that this must have been working at up to at least the local 11kV distribution level. Just as an aside, I think that the grid and supergrid operate at 275kV and 400kV, Yep 400 kV. Even so it would be interesting to see how they get the RF on and off the line;-!!! wouldn't go through the trannies too well unless they were using Russ A MK-IV snake oil of course;-)) not 475kV. I also have a dim recollection of reading somewhere, that the 25kV overhead lines on the uk rail nework, were also used for HF telemetry, but again, I could be going off on one there. Never heard of that?. Suffering from CRAFTs disease, don'tcha know ... !! d;~} Errmm hate to admit I do know;-0 Arfa -- Tony Sayer I guess you would get it on and off capacitively. Not too difficult to make a cap of a few decimals of a uF at several hundred kV working, I would have thought. You'd then use these to bridge any high inductances in the way, such as tranny windings, and to get the data on and off. Depending on the frequencies involved, you may actually get away with a few hundred pF. I'm sure that such caps must have existed when megawatt main UHF TV transmitter sites, such as Sandy Heath, used valve transmitters at the bottom of the mast ( perhaps still do ?? ). Also, maybe for use in high pulse power radar ? Arfa |
Mains filters
"Roderick Stewart" wrote in message om... In article , Glenn Richards wrote: The main reason I was asking... as I said in an earlier post, because I work from home I've got about a dozen PCs sitting in the next room, on the same ring main as the hi-fi. Which makes one wonder just how much crap is getting onto the mains. Mains is full of crap anyway. Have you ever looked at it with a scope? Sometimes it looks nothing whatsoever like those neat sinewaves in the textbooks, but the power supplies in any electronic equipment running from it will transform it, rectify it, filter it and stabilise it and thereby turn it into clean DC for the electronics itself because that's what power supplies do. Filtering the mains will have no additional benefit. Rod. That's what power supplies *should* do, Rod ! I've seen many linears in lower end equipment, though, where the HF bypassing is poor, and spiky crap, at least, does find its way onto the DC rails, and things like fridge stats and room stats, and even next door's electric lawnmower motor, do cause audible disturbance. In such cases, a surge plug or filtered plug or combination of both plug, may prove beneficial. However, in general, I agree with everyone else, that once you've got beyond the eighty quid TescoSonic market, the input and power supply filtering easily take care of any mains borne crap, and additional external filtering will be a waste of good beer money. Arfa |
Mains filters
Roderick Stewart wrote:
In a conversation I had with a friend, we determined that power cables are good at carrying low frequencies, and poor at carrying higher frequencies. So RFI picked up at the substation won't make it to your house, but interference sources in your house will cause RFI to reach your kit. How do you determine the electrical properties of cables by conversation? By applying known principles of engineering. The losses at high frequencies are significantly higher in 2.5mm mains wiring cable than screened co-ax, if you don't believe me try running a composite video signal down mains cable (rather than 75ohm co-ax) and see how far you get. It's like saying "how can you determine that an Audi Quattro is going to go around a hairpin bend at 100mph faster than a Ford Fiesta", for example. -- Glenn Richards Tel: (01453) 845735 Squirrel Solutions http://www.squirrelsolutions.co.uk/ IT consultancy, hardware and software support, broadband installation |
All times are GMT. The time now is 01:54 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.0.0
Copyright ©2004-2006 AudioBanter.co.uk