![]() |
Mains filters
"Arfa Daily" wrote in message ... "tony sayer" wrote in message ... I guess you would get it on and off capacitively. Not too difficult to make a cap of a few decimals of a uF at several hundred kV working, I would have thought. You'd then use these to bridge any high inductances in the way, such as tranny windings, and to get the data on and off. Depending on the frequencies involved, you may actually get away with a few hundred pF. Perhaps but I don't seem to remember seeing much else apart from longish glass insulators big switch gear and fecking big trannies!... I'm sure that such caps must have existed when megawatt main UHF TV transmitter sites, such as Sandy Heath, used valve transmitters at the bottom of the mast ( perhaps still do ?? ). Klystons 'tho solid state may be used there now. Do note that the megawatt etc is radiated power, much more to do with aerial gains. They don't have megga-watt UHF TV tx'es.... -- Tony Sayer Yeah, know all about ERPs, but do the flat panel transmission antennas actually have much gain ? Thought they were just a bunch of co-phased dipoles. Bet the launch power from the tx is still a good 2 or 300 kW, though, and I'd bet that there was a fair whack of volts on the klystron to get there ... Arfa The high-power UHF TV Transmitters in the UK are 50kW, mostly PyeTVT/Harris with a number of Marconi as well. The difference between the Tx power and ERP is entirely made up of antenna gain. UHF antennas have a very narrow beam, tilted downwards, as there's no point sending power off into space. The beam is sufficiently narrow so that the signal close to the mast is actually less than at a distance, also avoiding people's receivers from overloading. I don't know how many Klystrons are left in UK service, I would guess a fair few. Channel 5 was engineered right from the start with Solid State transmitters, of , if I remember correctly 10kW power, Channel 4 was klystron originally. S. |
Mains filters
Jim Lesurf wrote:
That mains filters may be useful if you are having a problem with audible 'clicks and pops' from the mains, and can't suppress them at source. What about inaudible RF interference, for example from a PC PSU? I know all about the regulations... but I've opened enough of these things up to know that they often radiate like a spark transmitter. Ideally, though, the audio equipment is well enough designed to prevent such problems being audible. In an ideal world, yes... but even kit like my Arcam stuff is still built to a budget. I've had long conversations with R&D bods from companies like Arcam, Meridian etc at hi-fi shows, and they're always cursing the beancounters... "we wanted to put more RFI filtering in, but budget constraints meant we had to make sacrifices" etc etc. However, simply chainging 'mains cable' with no filter or surge suppressor is probably a waste of effort. Yup... if you replaced your IEC cable with 3-core braided cable with screening, all you'd be doing is making sure the RFI got from one end to the other with minimal losses! Been doing a bit of research today, and I've located something called an Isotek cable. A friend at Sevenoaks hi-fi has offered to bring one around (the one they use in their demo room) to find out if it makes a difference, and if so, how it works, what type of filter it uses etc. I've managed to source some braided 3 core screened cable that's rated for mains use and only costs about £4/m, filtered plug less than £2, IEC line socket about £1.20. If it does make a difference, I'm going to have a go at making my own for about 8 quid instead of the 60 quid an Isotek cable costs. Then sell my own ones for 50-60 quid. ;-) Will post the results of my testing after the weekend - I can't get hold of the loan cable until Sunday as they'll need it in the demo room on Saturday. -- Glenn Richards Tel: (01453) 845735 Squirrel Solutions http://www.squirrelsolutions.co.uk/ IT consultancy, hardware and software support, broadband installation |
Mains filters
"Serge Auckland" wrote in message ... "Arfa Daily" wrote in message ... "tony sayer" wrote in message ... I guess you would get it on and off capacitively. Not too difficult to make a cap of a few decimals of a uF at several hundred kV working, I would have thought. You'd then use these to bridge any high inductances in the way, such as tranny windings, and to get the data on and off. Depending on the frequencies involved, you may actually get away with a few hundred pF. Perhaps but I don't seem to remember seeing much else apart from longish glass insulators big switch gear and fecking big trannies!... I'm sure that such caps must have existed when megawatt main UHF TV transmitter sites, such as Sandy Heath, used valve transmitters at the bottom of the mast ( perhaps still do ?? ). Klystons 'tho solid state may be used there now. Do note that the megawatt etc is radiated power, much more to do with aerial gains. They don't have megga-watt UHF TV tx'es.... -- Tony Sayer Yeah, know all about ERPs, but do the flat panel transmission antennas actually have much gain ? Thought they were just a bunch of co-phased dipoles. Bet the launch power from the tx is still a good 2 or 300 kW, though, and I'd bet that there was a fair whack of volts on the klystron to get there ... Arfa The high-power UHF TV Transmitters in the UK are 50kW, mostly PyeTVT/Harris with a number of Marconi as well. The difference between the Tx power and ERP is entirely made up of antenna gain. UHF antennas have a very narrow beam, tilted downwards, as there's no point sending power off into space. The beam is sufficiently narrow so that the signal close to the mast is actually less than at a distance, also avoiding people's receivers from overloading. I don't know how many Klystrons are left in UK service, I would guess a fair few. Channel 5 was engineered right from the start with Solid State transmitters, of , if I remember correctly 10kW power, Channel 4 was klystron originally. S. Thanks Tony and Serge. All interesting stuff. When S.H. UHF was first put into service, I was an apprentice in the TV trade, and the Rediffusion branch that I worked for, was chosen to do field strength monitoring by the IBA, I think it was. Their boys left a receiver with us, with a chart recorder attached. It was my job to check the tuning of it every morning. Then it got hit by lightning as I recall, and the very expensive feeder from Sweden or some such place, got fried. I seem to think that a substitute piece of pipe from somewhere was put in place to get the site going again, but there was some VSWR issue with it, because it was a few feet too short and had to be joined, and whenever the antennas iced up a bit, the SWR seen by the tx would go just a bit too far out of spec, and the auto protection would pull it off the air. That tx was never as good after ... Happy days !! ;-) Arfa |
Mains filters
In article , Glenn Richards
writes Jim Lesurf wrote: That mains filters may be useful if you are having a problem with audible 'clicks and pops' from the mains, and can't suppress them at source. What about inaudible RF interference, for example from a PC PSU? I know all about the regulations... but I've opened enough of these things up to know that they often radiate like a spark transmitter. Ideally, though, the audio equipment is well enough designed to prevent such problems being audible. In an ideal world, yes... but even kit like my Arcam stuff is still built to a budget. I've had long conversations with R&D bods from companies like Arcam, Meridian etc at hi-fi shows, and they're always cursing the beancounters... "we wanted to put more RFI filtering in, but budget constraints meant we had to make sacrifices" etc etc. However, simply chainging 'mains cable' with no filter or surge suppressor is probably a waste of effort. Yup... if you replaced your IEC cable with 3-core braided cable with screening, all you'd be doing is making sure the RFI got from one end to the other with minimal losses! Been doing a bit of research today, and I've located something called an Isotek cable. A friend at Sevenoaks hi-fi has offered to bring one around (the one they use in their demo room) to find out if it makes a difference, and if so, how it works, what type of filter it uses etc. I've managed to source some braided 3 core screened cable that's rated for mains use and only costs about £4/m, filtered plug less than £2, IEC line socket about £1.20. If it does make a difference, I'm going to have a go at making my own for about 8 quid instead of the 60 quid an Isotek cable costs. Then sell my own ones for 50-60 quid. ;-) Don't forget the bit of twin and earth to the consumer unit and the lump of wire to the substation, and the HV stuff feeding that;-) Will post the results of my testing after the weekend - I can't get hold of the loan cable until Sunday as they'll need it in the demo room on Saturday. Actually why don't you make some up, get some real bull**** speak on a flashy website sell 'em for a least ten times what the price was you made them at, and I'll bet you'll find some feeble minded wallies to sell them to. And BTW give us 10% for putting the idea in your head wontcha;-)) -- Tony Sayer |
Mains filters
In article ,
Arny Krueger wrote: You've never heard things like a fridge splat etc which is mains borne? Of course it depends on the design of the power supply in your amp, etc. Most such interference probably does not come in via the power supply or component power cord. I've got a dedicated radial circuit with its own earth feeding my AV equipment. It's probably the clean ground that's providing any noticable benefit. It's pretty hard to make up a clean ground with a line cord filter. Yup. The easiest way to get a 'clean' mains supply for audio. Standard practice in studios. -- *If we weren't meant to eat animals, why are they made of meat? Dave Plowman London SW To e-mail, change noise into sound. |
Mains filters
tony sayer wrote:
Don't forget the bit of twin and earth to the consumer unit and the lump of wire to the substation, and the HV stuff feeding that;-) Heh... Except that's *upstream* of the filter, so... as long as you're not picking up RF interference on the cable between the filter and the back of your equipment I'm guessing the actual mains cable doesn't matter too much. That said, if you've got the amount of RF-radiating crap in your house that I have... it's probably worth wrapping tinfoil around the power cables... and around your head as well so your brain doesn't get microwaved. Will post the results of my testing after the weekend - I can't get hold of the loan cable until Sunday as they'll need it in the demo room on Saturday. Actually why don't you make some up, get some real bull**** speak on a flashy website sell 'em for a least ten times what the price was you made them at, and I'll bet you'll find some feeble minded wallies to sell them to. Had actually thought of that. In fact, I came up with the idea of using Arctic grade flex (it's blue, so it looks pretty) with a filtered plug and a decent quality IEC connector, cost around £5, could sell 'em for about £50. Or if they actually *do* make a difference to the sound, £100. And BTW give us 10% for putting the idea in your head wontcha;-)) Heh, I'd already had that idea. :-P -- Glenn Richards Tel: (01453) 845735 Squirrel Solutions http://www.squirrelsolutions.co.uk/ IT consultancy, hardware and software support, broadband installation |
Mains filters
In article , Glenn
Richards writes tony sayer wrote: Don't forget the bit of twin and earth to the consumer unit and the lump of wire to the substation, and the HV stuff feeding that;-) Heh... Except that's *upstream* of the filter, so... as long as you're not picking up RF interference on the cable between the filter and the back of your equipment I'm guessing the actual mains cable doesn't matter too much. That said, if you've got the amount of RF-radiating crap in your house that I have... it's probably worth wrapping tinfoil around the power cables... and around your head as well so your brain doesn't get microwaved. Sell that to them as well. Tinfoil beanie hats.. Will post the results of my testing after the weekend - I can't get hold of the loan cable until Sunday as they'll need it in the demo room on Saturday. Actually why don't you make some up, get some real bull**** speak on a flashy website sell 'em for a least ten times what the price was you made them at, and I'll bet you'll find some feeble minded wallies to sell them to. Had actually thought of that. In fact, I came up with the idea of using Arctic grade flex (it's blue, so it looks pretty) with a filtered plug and a decent quality IEC connector, cost around £5, could sell 'em for about £50. Or if they actually *do* make a difference to the sound, £100. Nope.. the higher you price them, the more the gullible will believe they should have them, as they will then feel need them even more and cos their more expensive they must be better right;?... And BTW give us 10% for putting the idea in your head wontcha;-)) Heh, I'd already had that idea. :-P 15% now snip eh?... -- Tony Sayer |
Mains filters
"tony sayer" wrote in message
Rane, a U.S. pro audio gear manufacturer with a very solid reputation for conservative technology claims that some of their gear (like mic preamps) showed a SNR advantage when the power transformer was moved out of the box and into a big plastic wart on the power cord. http://www.rane.com/rap.html Reasons to use external pwoer supples: "Better Audio Performance. Removes the hum source, i.e. the AC line transformer and all primary circuits resulting in quieter noise performance, without the usual (and annoying) 50/60 Hz and 150/180 Hz hum components." More bollockx. **** poor design then, if their having those problems. Mic preamps for audio production are a more stringent environment than say, RIAA phono preamps. RIAA MM phono preamps have 40 dB gain at 20Hz, but their noise bandwidth is only 50 Hz. Mic preamps typically have up to 60 dB of gain, and a minimum of 20 KHz noise bandwidth, usually far more. This "wall-wart" caper is more to do with complying with different regs in different markets... That, too. |
Mains filters
Hi,
"Glenn Richards" wrote in message . uk... That said, if you've got the amount of RF-radiating crap in your house that I have... it's probably worth wrapping tinfoil around the power cables... and around your head as well so your brain doesn't get microwaved. You'd be doing well to have more RF noise in your house than I have, and mains filters here do nothing that I can hear. We have 3 802.11g access points, radio phone and pager system, wireless TV senders, upwards of ten PCs and a bunch of other electrically noisy stuff (we're a bit geeky). When we moved in I got the 'shed' (listening room) rewired, and in the process borrowed some filtered 'multi-way' adapters. I spent an entire weekend wiring and listening, and could hear absolutely no difference when they were in circuit. YMMV. Heh, I'd already had that idea. :-P You're not the first, and you won't be the last :-) Regards, Glenn. |
Mains filters
"Glenn Booth" wrote in message ... Hi, "Glenn Richards" wrote in message . uk... That said, if you've got the amount of RF-radiating crap in your house that I have... it's probably worth wrapping tinfoil around the power cables... and around your head as well so your brain doesn't get microwaved. You'd be doing well to have more RF noise in your house than I have, and mains filters here do nothing that I can hear. We have 3 802.11g access points, radio phone and pager system, wireless TV senders, upwards of ten PCs and a bunch of other electrically noisy stuff (we're a bit geeky). When we moved in I got the 'shed' (listening room) rewired, and in the process borrowed some filtered 'multi-way' adapters. I spent an entire weekend wiring and listening, and could hear absolutely no difference when they were in circuit. YMMV. Heh, I'd already had that idea. :-P You're not the first, and you won't be the last :-) Regards, Glenn. I think there is a point being missed he- Mains filtering won't "make the audio sound better", but it will remove impulsive interference like motor switching spikes if any are present. If you do an A-B comparison before and after installing any filtering, you *won't* hear any difference unless just at the time you were doing the tests, the farmer next door switches off his milking machine, or the spot-welder at the blacksmith down the lane goes off. Closer to home, fridge compressors and central heating pumps can put splats on the mains, and whilst I would always suggest suppression at source, that might not be possible if the offending item is in your neighbour's house, or the next flat. The avoidance of mains-borne clicks or equipment lock-ups is the main function of domestic mains filtering. All other suggestions of improvements in the sound are snake-oil, put about by those selling expensive filtering items. S. |
All times are GMT. The time now is 01:47 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.0.0
Copyright ©2004-2006 AudioBanter.co.uk