A Audio, hi-fi and car audio  forum. Audio Banter

Go Back   Home » Audio Banter forum » UK Audio Newsgroups » uk.rec.audio (General Audio and Hi-Fi)
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

uk.rec.audio (General Audio and Hi-Fi) (uk.rec.audio) Discussion and exchange of hi-fi audio equipment.

Why moving coil



 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old March 17th 06, 09:19 AM posted to uk.rec.audio
Serge Auckland
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 509
Default Why moving coil


"Bill Taylor" wrote in message
...
On Thu, 16 Mar 2006 23:23:34 -0000, "Serge Auckland"
wrote:


"Bill Taylor" wrote in message
...
On Thu, 16 Mar 2006 19:08:27 -0000, "Serge Auckland"
wrote:



The only vaguely convincing explanation that I've heard is that MCs
can use less damping of the stylus assembly. Theoretically this
should allow better trackability at mid frequencies. I also have vague
recollections that the cantilever can more easily be made shorter,
which would help in keeping the effective tip mass down, which should
give better HF trackability. (Compliance only needs to be more than
about 10-12c.u. to track all records)

Bill


Interesting theories. Can you tell me a bit more as to why a compliance of
10-12cu is sufficient for all records? Interesting that in vinyl's heyday,
some cartridges were providing 30-40 cu. It could be a marketing exercise
rather than having a sound engineering reason for it, but it would be
useful
to know why such high compliances are not necessary.


According to J Walton in "Pickups - The Key to Hi Fi" (published 1968,
but the physics haven't changed): the maximum excursion on an LP is
about .005cm, "if compliance were the only factor involved a
compliance of 2 c.u. is quite sufficient to track the largest stereo
amplitude of .005 cm at 3 gm tracking weight". It's possible that a
small number of modern LPs have slightly higher excursions, and
tracking weights are a bit lower, so a slightly higher compliance is
needed, but not that much higher.


Thanks for the reference. I'll try and find one if possible.

The very high compliances of the 70s were very much a marketing
excercise. The other important factor with compliance is the LF
resonance with the cartridge/arm mass. The ideal resonant frequency is
about 10-15 Hz, any lower than that and the cartridge system is liable
to become unstable and skip grooves with the slightest disturbance,
and the oscillations caused by these disturbances produce very audible
wow and tracking force variations. Some of the high compliance
cartridges needed a negative mass arm in order to get the LF resonance
up to a reasonable frequency.


Yes, remember the ADC25? Compliance 50 units, cartridge mass 8.3 gm. Needed
a 0 mass arm!



 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT. The time now is 02:58 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.SEO by vBSEO 3.0.0
Copyright ©2004-2025 Audio Banter.
The comments are property of their posters.