In ,
Arny Krueger typed:
"Jo" wrote in
message
In news Arny Krueger typed:
Given sufficient runs of the above tests, any real
effect could be teased out. Has anyone actually done
this ?

Of course. For the past 3 decades.


Any online examples ?

http://www.provide.net/~djcarlst/abx.htm

http://www.pcabx.com/

http://www.bostonaudiosociety.org/ba...bx_testing.htm

http://www.hydrogenaudio.org/forums/...howtopic=16295

http://sound.westhost.com/abx-tester.htm

http://ackthud.com/shawnfogg/pics/temp/ABX.pdf

http://ff123.net/abchr/abchr.html

http://www.mpex.net/info/abx.html

http://www.hometheaterhifi.com/volum...s-12-2004.html

http://www.soundandvisionmag.com/ass...rInterface.pdf

http://bruce.coppola.name/audio/Amp_Sound.pdf

http://bruce.coppola.name/audio/Greenhill.pdf

to name just a few...

Thanks Arny,

Fascinating reading...

Jo

My opinion!
Biwring is nonsense
Biamping makes sense especially if you place the crossover in front of
the final amp (but even without doing that there's a good difference).
Barend

On Mon, 10 Apr 2006 12:40:09 +0200, Barend wrote:

My opinion!
Biwring is nonsense
Biamping makes sense especially if you place the crossover in front of
the final amp (but even without doing that there's a good difference).

Biamping with an active crossover, and bypassing the speaker's
internal crossover, can indeed make a difference. So-called 'passive'
biamping using the speaker crossover makes no sense at all, unless
you're using a particularly weedy amplifier which doesn't have enough
current to drive the speakers properly.

In this case, it makes a lot more sense to trade up to one decent
amplifier, than to buy another weedy one!
--

Stewart Pinkerton | Music is Art - Audio is Engineering

Posted Via Usenet.com Premium Usenet Newsgroup Services
----------------------------------------------------------
** SPEED ** RETENTION ** COMPLETION ** ANONYMITY **
----------------------------------------------------------
http://www.usenet.com