Steven R. Rochlin wrote:
Hi Everyone,
After half a ream of dumb smoke Rochlin blew (2) in the hope of boring
you into reading something else, we finally get to his reply to the
serious charges (1) against him:
-----
Andre Jute wrote:
Rochlin: far from "helping audiophiles" as you claim,
you are a parasite on high fidelity, pushing bland and
incompetent **** because the makers pay you for
advertising on your silly site and for the number of
foolish audiophiles who read your one-sided
travesties of reviews. You are a sales hack, pure
and simple, but one without the balls to open up
an emporium on the high street. --- Andre Jute
Enjoy the Music.com reviews/mentions far more products/manufacturers who
have never advertised than those who have. If you take the time to see the
hundreds of reviews, and thousands of products within our show reports, you
would note that only a very, very small fraction advertise.
This is an admission of every charge against you, Steven R. Rochlin,
and against your shill operation, EnjoyTheMusic.
You stand accused of being "a parasite on high fidelity, pushing bland
and incompetent **** because the makers pay you for adverising on your
silly site".
Your answer is that you push the bland and incompetent **** of many
others as well. Of course you do, so that you can say to them, "Look,
here is a lying review that flatters your useless ****. Advertise with
me and I'll never stop flattering your useless ****."
You're so shameless that you don't even bother to deny that at Rochlin
Ripoff Inc advertising payments buy better reviews. It is to avoid this
sort of abuse that real magazines are operated by men who know enough,
and have pride enough, and capital enough, to separate the editorial
and advertising sales functions into separate offices and executives.
In the rest of the thread in which you stand accused (1) and pretty
well proven guilty and convicted of this and other crimes against
fidelity, the usenet, honesty and decency, you will also find that your
behaviour is condemned by the professional body of advertising agents
in the US, by the professional body of publishers in the US (who
roundly applaud the 4As policy), by leading figures in consumer
protection in Washington, by the lawmakers in the US, by the EU, by a
wide variety of decent, honest people with their minds in gear. But
your answer is that you would like to commit your dishonesties on a
larger scale!
More smoke (2) snipped, as well as the usual Rochlin backscratching of
the most disgusting of the garage vermin. In ten years Rochlin hasn't
grasped that I despise him, and those he sucks up to, for his and their
selfserving claim that the usenet exists only to enrich them by
providing a free advertising channel for their substandard and, in
Rochlin's case, actually harmful, ****.
Thanks again
everyone for your posts as they have been extremely helpful for what may
become an article concerning unmoderated newsgroups.
You do that, Rochlin. We'll discover if you can actually write anything
with more backbone than that prophylactic full of Jello you resemble so
closely. In all the years of EnjoyTheMusic.Shill I haven't seen a
single example of honest text from you, or indeed from any of your
fellow-travellers in that blandly indiscriminate gush of bought
approval of crap being pushed onto unsuspecting fashion victims.
The best test of whether what you write is worthwhile is that a real
publisher will pay you real money to print the article on real paper.
If you have to publish your article on EnjoyTheMusic.VanityWarning it
is by definition rubbish.
Steven R. Rochlin
EnjoyTheMusic.HelpMeGetRichQuick
You're a disgrace, man.
Where you can find:
(several socalled "magazines" in which *all* the so-called editorial
matter is illegal advertising)
Andre Jute
Zero tolerance for greedy netscum
(1) See the thread "Not enjoying the cacaphony of the sales hack Steven
R. Rochlin abusing us to make a buck" which starts he
http://groups.google.ie/group/rec.au...520598 e4cf0f
(2) Here is Rochlin's complete attempt to bore eveyone to death before
they reach what little meat there is in Rochlin's watery stew of
evasions, deceits and lies:
Steven R. Rochlin wrote:
Hi Everyone,
Have been sitting back and watching the usual downward spiral, personal
attacks, sock puppets, forged postings, etc with the rec.audio.tube and
rec.audio.opinion non-moderated audio newsgroups. You have provided me with
some excellent content that may appear in a future article. Thanks for the
wonderful ebb and flow.
And now on with some replies:
NOTE: some posts were by the usual "sock puppets" or those who use others'
names to hide their own identity. My replies below simple states who the
proclaimed individual poster is, or pretends to be. This will be my only
reply to this thread for now, though may enjoy seeing your replies that
could provide more content for a possible upcoming article.
-----
Andre Jute Wed, Jul 5 2006 12:30 pm
Rochlin: far from "helping audiophiles" as you claim,
you are a parasite on high fidelity, pushing bland and
incompetent **** because the makers pay you for
adverising on your silly site and for the number of
foolish audiophiles who read your one-sided
travesties of reviews. You are a sales hack, pure
and simple, but one without the balls to open up
an emporium on the high street. --- Andre Jute
Enjoy the Music.com reviews/mentions far more products/manufacturers who
have never advertised than those who have. If you take the time to see the
hundreds of reviews, and thousands of products within our show reports, you
would note that only a very, very small fraction advertise.
-------------------
From: George M. Middius, Wed, Jul 5 2006 2:22 pm
Are you aware that Rochelin once sold his house
in order to buy a $100K amplifier?
Incorrect on both accounts. Please show proof of your statement.
-------
From: George M. Middius, Wed, Jul 5 2006 2:22 pm
He's the sort of climber who once advised people not
to wear a Rolex too often to protect the resale value.
Incorrect. Please show proof of your statement. If anyone reading this
does own a Rolex, please wear it as often as possible since Rolex
manufacturers a very durable product.
----------
From: Navin R. Johnson, Wed, Jul 12 2006 12:21 am
hmmm..
what exactly is going on here?
-----------
From: Jon Yaeger, Wed, Jul 12 2006 12:32 am
Don't ask. You REALLY don't want to know.
Jon
Amen Jon.
Decided to not answer other posts, and of course not bother posting the
usual sock puppets, personal attacks between one another, etc. Thanks again
everyone for your posts as they have been extremely helpful for what may
become an article concerning unmoderated newsgroups.
Enjoy the Music,
Steven R. Rochlin
http://www.EnjoyTheMusic.com
Where you can find:
Superior Audio, The Absolute Sound,
Review Magazine, The $ensible Sound,
The Audiophile Voice... and MUCH more!
Steven R. Rochlin's deceitful apologia for EnjoyTheMusic.ShillForAdvertisers
Hybrid Mode
