![]() |
Too damn old for this silliness...
Nick has very kindly loaned me his superb Behringer ECM 8000 measurement mic for me to do my speaker investigations and a very handy disk with test tones and various tracks on it - including some 'bangs' which, of course, are only there to entertain immature types who never got over such silly, schoolboy stuff.... .....so, here are two versions of the same 3 short tracks (machine gun, Chieftain tank, thunderclap) recorded open mic: http://www.apah69.dsl.pipex.com/show/Bangs%20A.mp3 http://www.apah69.dsl.pipex.com/show/Bangs%20B.mp3 :-) They are different amp/speaker pairings, otherwise all else is the same for both trax and the recording level shenanigans were as much a bugger as they have been on my little lapel mic! Anybody care to pick the 'better one'...?? (Headphones on and wick 'em up for best effect!!... ;-) |
Too damn old for this silliness...
Keith G wrote:
....so, here are two versions of the same 3 short tracks (machine gun, Chieftain tank, thunderclap) recorded open mic: Ah, the Alan Parsons sound check CD - the trains are good. Lights out, and your sitting in a station... The 1000mph jet fly-past is a peach. -- Wally www.wally.myby.co.uk I eat my peas with honey, I've done it all my life. It makes the peas taste funny, but it keeps them on the knife. (Spike Milligan) |
Too damn old for this silliness...
On Sun, 1 Oct 2006 00:05:37 +0100, "Keith G"
wrote: Nick has very kindly loaned me his superb Behringer ECM 8000 measurement mic for me to do my speaker investigations and a very handy disk with test tones and various tracks on it - including some 'bangs' which, of course, are only there to entertain immature types who never got over such silly, schoolboy stuff.... ....so, here are two versions of the same 3 short tracks (machine gun, Chieftain tank, thunderclap) recorded open mic: http://www.apah69.dsl.pipex.com/show/Bangs%20A.mp3 http://www.apah69.dsl.pipex.com/show/Bangs%20B.mp3 :-) They are different amp/speaker pairings, otherwise all else is the same for both trax and the recording level shenanigans were as much a bugger as they have been on my little lapel mic! Anybody care to pick the 'better one'...?? (Headphones on and wick 'em up for best effect!!... ;-) I had expected them to be rather more similar than they were. Speaker B has unbelievably peaky treble; it really is most unpleasant sounding. Of course there is a chance that is the way the track is meant to sound, but somehow I doubt it. Which was which? Could you post a direct connection recording for a reference? d -- Pearce Consulting http://www.pearce.uk.com |
Too damn old for this silliness...
Wally wrote (in his sig):
I eat my peas with honey, I've done it all my life. It makes the peas taste funny, but it keeps them on the knife. (Spike Milligan) I think you'll find that verse predates Spike Milligan. -- Eiron No good deed ever goes unpunished. |
Too damn old for this silliness...
Keith G wrote: Nick has very kindly loaned me his superb Behringer ECM 8000 measurement mic for me to do my speaker investigations and a very handy disk with test tones and various tracks on it - including some 'bangs' which, of course, are only there to entertain immature types who never got over such silly, schoolboy stuff.... ....so, here are two versions of the same 3 short tracks (machine gun, Chieftain tank, thunderclap) recorded open mic: http://www.apah69.dsl.pipex.com/show/Bangs%20A.mp3 http://www.apah69.dsl.pipex.com/show/Bangs%20B.mp3 :-) They are different amp/speaker pairings, otherwise all else is the same for both trax and the recording level shenanigans were as much a bugger as they have been on my little lapel mic! Anybody care to pick the 'better one'...?? (Headphones on and wick 'em up for best effect!!... ;-) The B version has no bass. What's the point of this ? Graham |
Too damn old for this silliness...
"Don Pearce" wrote I had expected them to be rather more similar than they were. So did I, but I have introduced another variable since the other recent recordings (??) - in reality, the A speakers are the 'peakier' ones by far!! (Actually, the player was different also - a Pioneer DVDP this time, but I doubt it made any difference.) Speaker B has unbelievably peaky treble; it really is most unpleasant sounding. Of course there is a chance that is the way the track is meant to sound, but somehow I doubt it. Which was which? Let me keep it 'blind' for the moment and I'll post some more trax (with the above variable taken out of the equation) later, when I have mastered the levels at bit better - those recordings were the very first I have done with Nick's mic. Everything is still on the floor to avoid clipping - just like always!! And the waveforms are all over the place atm!! Could you post a direct connection recording for a reference? OK, in this order: http://www.apah69.dsl.pipex.com/show/Track%2089.mp3 http://www.apah69.dsl.pipex.com/show/Track%2090.mp3 http://www.apah69.dsl.pipex.com/show/Track%2091.mp3 |
Too damn old for this silliness...
On Sun, 1 Oct 2006 11:14:35 +0100, "Keith G"
wrote: "Don Pearce" wrote I had expected them to be rather more similar than they were. So did I, but I have introduced another variable since the other recent recordings (??) - in reality, the A speakers are the 'peakier' ones by far!! (Actually, the player was different also - a Pioneer DVDP this time, but I doubt it made any difference.) Speaker B has unbelievably peaky treble; it really is most unpleasant sounding. Of course there is a chance that is the way the track is meant to sound, but somehow I doubt it. Which was which? Let me keep it 'blind' for the moment and I'll post some more trax (with the above variable taken out of the equation) later, when I have mastered the levels at bit better - those recordings were the very first I have done with Nick's mic. Everything is still on the floor to avoid clipping - just like always!! And the waveforms are all over the place atm!! Could you post a direct connection recording for a reference? OK, in this order: http://www.apah69.dsl.pipex.com/show/Track%2089.mp3 http://www.apah69.dsl.pipex.com/show/Track%2090.mp3 http://www.apah69.dsl.pipex.com/show/Track%2091.mp3 OK - all sussed. Your system (not the microphone/PC - your record player) was seriously heavily overloaded and clipped during playback. It is just way short of power capability for reproducing that waveform. Try turning it down quite a long way, then we can get to grips with what it is really doing. d -- Pearce Consulting http://www.pearce.uk.com |
Too damn old for this silliness...
"Don Pearce" wrote OK - all sussed. Your system (not the microphone/PC - your record player) was seriously heavily overloaded and clipped during playback. It is just way short of power capability for reproducing that waveform. Try turning it down quite a long way, then we can get to grips with what it is really doing. OK, I'll redo Bangs B and repost it - a little later, the 'household' isn't, er, fully assembled yet so I am stuffed for open mic stuff!! (If I don't do summat different - I've heard enough of those bangs to last a lifetime!!) |
Too damn old for this silliness...
On Sun, 1 Oct 2006 11:49:41 +0100, "Keith G"
wrote: "Don Pearce" wrote OK - all sussed. Your system (not the microphone/PC - your record player) was seriously heavily overloaded and clipped during playback. It is just way short of power capability for reproducing that waveform. Try turning it down quite a long way, then we can get to grips with what it is really doing. OK, I'll redo Bangs B and repost it - a little later, the 'household' isn't, er, fully assembled yet so I am stuffed for open mic stuff!! (If I don't do summat different - I've heard enough of those bangs to last a lifetime!!) I've put together some piccies of what's going on, here http://81.174.169.10/odds/bangs/ d -- Pearce Consulting http://www.pearce.uk.com |
Too damn old for this silliness...
"Don Pearce" wrote in message ... On Sun, 1 Oct 2006 11:49:41 +0100, "Keith G" wrote: "Don Pearce" wrote OK - all sussed. Your system (not the microphone/PC - your record player) was seriously heavily overloaded and clipped during playback. It is just way short of power capability for reproducing that waveform. Try turning it down quite a long way, then we can get to grips with what it is really doing. OK, I'll redo Bangs B and repost it - a little later, the 'household' isn't, er, fully assembled yet so I am stuffed for open mic stuff!! (If I don't do summat different - I've heard enough of those bangs to last a lifetime!!) I've put together some piccies of what's going on, here http://81.174.169.10/odds/bangs/ Excellent stuff, Don - I'm back on this as soon as I can get to it. Right now I'm up to my neck in spreadsheet stuff for a second house purchase (joint with Son No. 2)...!! Shortly.... |
All times are GMT. The time now is 02:12 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.0.0
Copyright ©2004-2006 AudioBanter.co.uk