![]() |
What do you do with a *lively* room?
"Serge Auckland" wrote in message ... Keith G wrote: "Serge Auckland" wrote in message ... Keith G wrote: Keith, As one who *does* have a lifetime's experience of audio (and I'm only now realising how little I know)there's nothing new under the (audio) sun. Corner enclosures were very popular in the late '50s and '60s in part for the reasons you state: i.e. using the room corners to boost the bass, but also to keep them out of the way of furnishings. It was hard enough for people to find room for one large 'speaker, but when stereo came along, finding room for two was difficult. The WAF was as alive then as now. Serge, no-one is more aware that there's 'nothing new under the (audio) sun' than me - my amps date back to the 20s and 30s (design) and my speakers feature drivers that have been in *continuous production* for the last 50 years in a design probably just as old!! However, putting 'speakers in the corners won't make much difference in a live room over putting them elsewhere. The problem with a live room is reflections, which affect the mid and treble. Bass sees hard walls whatever they are covered with unless you take special steps to create bass traps. However, using single drive units, the treble will beam more than using separate dome tweeters, and angling them as you have will at least help keep the treble away from the walls. Yes and the angled sides allow the air to move freely - I'm back to thrumming doorframes here...!! I have just received a copy of the 1959 Audio Year Book and a copy of the July 1959 American "High Fidelity" magazine and they are full of weird and wonderful enclosures trying to make stereo acceptable domestically. :-) In spite of my long teeth, what's an OB 'speaker other than Outside Broadcast? Open Baffle - see the view down the back: http://www.apah69.dsl.pipex.com/show/openbaffle.JPG Also this, just to prove I can still do *handheld* at 1/8 of a second!! http://www.apah69.dsl.pipex.com/show/obspeakers4.JPG :-) Thanks, I'd forgotten about open baffles. However, what you have isn't really an OB if you put them in the corner. If it fits tightly in the corner it will approximate to a sealed box, sometimes referred to as an Infinite Baffle, but as the fit isn't likely to be airtight, you will have some gaps, so it will work to some extent something like a Bass-reflex cabinet, but with very indeterminate performance. An OB needs to be clear of the wall, or sealed to the wall in which case it is an IB or, if vented, then a bass-reflex. Yep, in other words I'm *using* the room, like I said originally but it's no way *sealed* - you could stand behind it!! There's no doubt it's very effective what ever you might want to call it!! I don't say it's a permanent arrangement - it has to beat the Fidelios to stay, for starters!! Wharfedale used to do a sand-filled open baffle with an upward firing tweeter, designed for free-field siting. Yes, when my friend P the T called earlier he started waffling about Briggs and early Wharfedales! You really should try a corner horn or Transmission Line someday. It's in there with all the other little 'maybe projects'! ;-) Now, have a go at this one - one of the *inimitable* Laurie Anderson's tracks: http://www.apah69.dsl.pipex.com/show/laurieanderson.mp3 Remember it's miked (silly cheap CAD GXL2400 large condensers at 49 quid a pop from UKProAudio on eBay*) - there's a nice lot going on in there and I think the single driver acquits itself rather well...!!?? * What? You thought they were Neumann U87s...?? :-) |
What do you do with a *lively* room?
In article ,
Keith G wrote: Yep, in other words I'm *using* the room, like I said originally but it's no way *sealed* - you could stand behind it!! There's no doubt it's very effective what ever you might want to call it!! I don't say it's a permanent arrangement - it has to beat the Fidelios to stay, for starters!! As you move that type of speaker into a corner it will load the bass somewhat - but not evenly. The frequency response will look like a dogs hind leg... -- *Heart attacks... God's revenge for eating his animal friends Dave Plowman London SW To e-mail, change noise into sound. |
What do you do with a *lively* room?
Keith G wrote: Serge, no-one is more aware that there's 'nothing new under the (audio) sun' than me - my amps date back to the 20s and 30s (design) and my speakers feature drivers that have been in *continuous production* for the last 50 years in a design probably just as old!! From what I've heard, they sound like it too ! Graham |
What do you do with a *lively* room?
In article ,
Eeyore wrote: Serge, no-one is more aware that there's 'nothing new under the (audio) sun' than me - my amps date back to the 20s and 30s (design) and my speakers feature drivers that have been in *continuous production* for the last 50 years in a design probably just as old!! From what I've heard, they sound like it too ! I can't remember the last single driver pro monitoring speaker, but the BEEB had gone to a twin unit in the AM only days... -- *I must always remember that I'm unique, just like everyone else. * Dave Plowman London SW To e-mail, change noise into sound. |
What do you do with a *lively* room?
"Dave Plowman (News)" wrote in message ... In article , Eeyore wrote: Serge, no-one is more aware that there's 'nothing new under the (audio) sun' than me - my amps date back to the 20s and 30s (design) and my speakers feature drivers that have been in *continuous production* for the last 50 years in a design probably just as old!! From what I've heard, they sound like it too ! I can't remember the last single driver pro monitoring speaker, but the BEEB had gone to a twin unit in the AM only days... -- *I must always remember that I'm unique, just like everyone else. * Dave Plowman London SW To e-mail, change noise into sound. I suspect (almost certain) that if I *bustled* I could have a pair of LS3/5As here by noon today... |
What do you do with a *lively* room?
"Dave Plowman (News)" wrote in message ... In article , Keith G wrote: Yep, in other words I'm *using* the room, like I said originally but it's no way *sealed* - you could stand behind it!! There's no doubt it's very effective what ever you might want to call it!! I don't say it's a permanent arrangement - it has to beat the Fidelios to stay, for starters!! As you move that type of speaker into a corner it will load the bass somewhat - but not evenly. The frequency response will look like a dogs hind leg... -- *Heart attacks... God's revenge for eating his animal friends Dave Plowman London SW To e-mail, change noise into sound. What the FR *might* look like is not my main concern - we're into the realms of 'hit & miss' audio here. What is far more important is how they sound, the bass has indeed been reinforced appreciably but whether I can *tune* into the sound overall is another question - I still have not had any opportunity for proper listening. IOW, the jury's not even been selected yet..... |
What do you do with a *lively* room?
In article ,
Keith G wrote: As you move that type of speaker into a corner it will load the bass somewhat - but not evenly. The frequency response will look like a dogs hind leg... What the FR *might* look like is not my main concern - we're into the realms of 'hit & miss' audio here. Heh heh. But if it *looks* like a dogs hind leg it will sound like it too. What is far more important is how they sound, the bass has indeed been reinforced appreciably but whether I can *tune* into the sound overall is another question - I still have not had any opportunity for proper listening. Perhaps you're after that radigram 'one note bass' sound? It's what often happens with open back enclosures. ;-) IOW, the jury's not even been selected yet..... Make sure it's twelve men good and true. -- *See no evil, Hear no evil, Date no evil. Dave Plowman London SW To e-mail, change noise into sound. |
What do you do with a *lively* room?
In article ,
Keith G wrote: "Dave Plowman (News)" wrote in message ... In article , Eeyore wrote: Serge, no-one is more aware that there's 'nothing new under the (audio) sun' than me - my amps date back to the 20s and 30s (design) and my speakers feature drivers that have been in *continuous production* for the last 50 years in a design probably just as old!! From what I've heard, they sound like it too ! I can't remember the last single driver pro monitoring speaker, but the BEEB had gone to a twin unit in the AM only days... I suspect (almost certain) that if I *bustled* I could have a pair of LS3/5As here by noon today... With a decent sub properly 'crossed over' they take some beating in a poor room - they are one of the least position influenced designs. Assuming you can find a pair still within spec. They aren't that long lived. -- *Does fuzzy logic tickle? * Dave Plowman London SW To e-mail, change noise into sound. |
What do you do with a *lively* room?
Keith G wrote:
Miking them thus: http://www.apah69.dsl.pipex.com/show/obspeakers3.JPG Could I suggest Keith that if you want to demonstrate how the speakers actually sound you should use a coincident pair at the listening position. Close miking is for guitar amps. Roy. |
What do you do with a *lively* room?
"Dave Plowman (News)" wrote in message ... In article , Keith G wrote: As you move that type of speaker into a corner it will load the bass somewhat - but not evenly. The frequency response will look like a dogs hind leg... What the FR *might* look like is not my main concern - we're into the realms of 'hit & miss' audio here. Heh heh. But if it *looks* like a dogs hind leg it will sound like it too. What is far more important is how they sound, the bass has indeed been reinforced appreciably but whether I can *tune* into the sound overall is another question - I still have not had any opportunity for proper listening. Perhaps you're after that radigram 'one note bass' sound? It's what often happens with open back enclosures. ;-) IOW, the jury's not even been selected yet..... Make sure it's twelve men good and true. -- *See no evil, Hear no evil, Date no evil. Dave Plowman London SW To e-mail, change noise into sound. I have only recorded two CDs from the speakers and so don't have too much to choose from, but these two clips are enough to tell me the bass isn't the least bit 'one-note': http://www.apah69.dsl.pipex.com/show/Sample%2004.mp3 http://www.apah69.dsl.pipex.com/show/Sample%2005.mp3 Or that there's any shortage of nice 'top end': http://www.apah69.dsl.pipex.com/show/Sample%2008.mp3 Or clarity and detail...??? What am I missing? - The more I listen to these clips, the more I'm liking the sound... |
All times are GMT. The time now is 07:43 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.0.0
Copyright ©2004-2006 AudioBanter.co.uk