![]() |
Simple systems with a HDD
In article ,
Keith G wrote: DAB - highly recommendable, has a headphone socket with volume control which means you can use it *standalone* with 'phones (playing as I type)... I have the DAB/FM tuner bought off Ebay secondhand. I've modified it to route the Quad AM3 thought it - to raise the level to 'normal' and to switch the power to it when not in use as the valves don't last forever. So if the A/S is powered down (with the amp supply on) the Quad is powered up and routed to the same outputs - saves on amp inputs. I'd say it's very well made and decent value for money. Incidentally on the DAB thing I'm well impressed with the DAB car radio. Drove from S London to Lincoln and back with it rock solid the whole way listening to R4 and R7 - and crisp and clear unlike FM under the same sort of conditions. It even seems to hang on longer going through tunnels. -- *If your feet smell and your nose runs, you're built upside down. Dave Plowman London SW To e-mail, change noise into sound. |
Simple systems with a HDD
On 23 Apr, 12:41, "Keith G" wrote:
"Dr Hfuhruhurr" wrote in message oups.com... On 23 Apr, 00:12, "Dave Plowman (News)" wrote: In article , Keith G wrote: There seems to be a glut of Acoustic Solutions CD 'Jukeboxes' on Ebay at the minute - it's a CD Player with an internal HD that you can rip CDs to. Don't think it can be used to record anything else, though. They seem to go for well under 100 quid new. Most of those have only a 40 Gig HDD - there is an 80 Gig version available: http://cgi.ebay.co.uk/ws/eBayISAPI.d...sspagename=STR... Yup - I bought an 80 gig one for 80 quid recently. It's pretty good for that price. Not sure it would be at the RRP, though. Since it uses a computer CD drive it's a bit noisier than an audio CD. But if you want a fairly basic stand alone jukebox system it's ok. But it won't play MP3 CDs. Nor does it say anywhere just how many CDs it will store. Mmmm 80gb * 1024 = 81,920Mb If you take an 'average' CD of 600 Mb then that's just over 136 CDs for WAV (which I'm presuming it is) files. There are three levels of compression (128/192/320 KB) available, I gather - so there would be the opportunity to store a lot more albums than that...?? Sounds like an MP3 Sylee compression in that 128Kb will fir 10 times as much onto the disk. Ergo 1360 CDs at what is probably an abominable compression ratio. Sounds like the best bet would be to go for the 320Kb to reduce the chance of artefacts. so more like 600-700 CDs. For £80 i'd be tempted to rip the lid of and try and cram something HUGE in there. Yes, if it would recognise a 500 Gig disk and *could handle* that many files it would be an awsome resource for not a lot of money, but the matching Acoustic Solutions CD player (which is perfectly OK sonically) can get confused with large numbers of MP3s on a CDRW, I believe. I recall that the one I have here will start to miss off a few seconds of each of the tracks, if it is subjected to a lot of button-pressing and skipping about on the remote...?? Always a problem with HDD based consumer devices is what format etc is the disk. Might have to have a play....... Doc |
Simple systems with a HDD
In article , Dave Plowman (News)
writes In article , Keith G wrote: DAB - highly recommendable, has a headphone socket with volume control which means you can use it *standalone* with 'phones (playing as I type)... I have the DAB/FM tuner bought off Ebay secondhand. I've modified it to route the Quad AM3 thought it - to raise the level to 'normal' and to switch the power to it when not in use as the valves don't last forever. So if the A/S is powered down (with the amp supply on) the Quad is powered up and routed to the same outputs - saves on amp inputs. I'd say it's very well made and decent value for money. Incidentally on the DAB thing I'm well impressed with the DAB car radio. Drove from S London to Lincoln and back with it rock solid the whole way listening to R4 and R7 - and crisp and clear unlike FM under the same sort of conditions. It even seems to hang on longer going through tunnels. Glad you like the sound of DABble Dave;!.... -- Tony Sayer |
Simple systems with a HDD
"Dave Plowman (News)" wrote in message ... In article , Keith G wrote: DAB - highly recommendable, has a headphone socket with volume control which means you can use it *standalone* with 'phones (playing as I type)... I have the DAB/FM tuner bought off Ebay secondhand. I've modified it to route the Quad AM3 thought it - to raise the level to 'normal' and to switch the power to it when not in use as the valves don't last forever. So if the A/S is powered down (with the amp supply on) the Quad is powered up and routed to the same outputs - saves on amp inputs. I'd say it's very well made and decent value for money. Agree entirely - especially as the Pure Evoke (??) 'separate' was the greater part of 300 nicker, last time I looked... Incidentally on the DAB thing I'm well impressed with the DAB car radio. Drove from S London to Lincoln and back with it rock solid the whole way listening to R4 and R7 - and crisp and clear unlike FM under the same sort of conditions. It even seems to hang on longer going through tunnels. FM on my cheap JVC car radio is quite excellent, I am delighted/relieved to say! |
Simple systems with a HDD
"Dr Hfuhruhurr" wrote Sounds like an MP3 Sylee compression in that 128Kb will fir 10 times as much onto the disk. Ergo 1360 CDs at what is probably an abominable compression ratio. Sounds like the best bet would be to go for the 320Kb to reduce the chance of artefacts. so more like 600-700 CDs. For £80 i'd be tempted to rip the lid of and try and cram something HUGE in there. Yes, if it would recognise a 500 Gig disk and *could handle* that many files it would be an awsome resource for not a lot of money, but the matching Acoustic Solutions CD player (which is perfectly OK sonically) can get confused with large numbers of MP3s on a CDRW, I believe. I recall that the one I have here will start to miss off a few seconds of each of the tracks, if it is subjected to a lot of button-pressing and skipping about on the remote...?? Always a problem with HDD based consumer devices is what format etc is the disk. Might have to have a play....... Do let us know how it goes if you do... |
Simple systems with a HDD
In article ,
tony sayer wrote: Incidentally on the DAB thing I'm well impressed with the DAB car radio. Drove from S London to Lincoln and back with it rock solid the whole way listening to R4 and R7 - and crisp and clear unlike FM under the same sort of conditions. It even seems to hang on longer going through tunnels. Glad you like the sound of DABble Dave;!.... If that's what it sounds like to you - you need to get a decent aerial. ;-) And in the car it sounds far better than the splashy sibilants I got on both the previous radio and the posh one in the other car, much of the time. Nuances like sound stage ain't quite so important. FWIW, the more criticism I hear about current DAB the more I wonder about those making it (mainly Mr DAB sounds worse than anything). The differences between it and FM are fairly subtle on the things I listen to whereas multipath and the effects of a decoder trying to get a decent sig to noise on a car setup are anything but. I note also that Mr Lesurf doesn't seem to find it quite as horrendous as many here claim. ;-) -- *Can fat people go skinny-dipping? Dave Plowman London SW To e-mail, change noise into sound. |
Simple systems with a HDD
Dave Plowman (News) wrote:
In article , Keith G wrote: Yup - I bought an 80 gig one for 80 quid recently. It's pretty good for that price. Not sure it would be at the RRP, though. Since it uses a computer CD drive it's a bit noisier than an audio CD. But if you want a fairly basic stand alone jukebox system it's ok. But it won't play MP3 CDs. Nor does it say anywhere just how many CDs it will store. Mmmm 80gb * 1024 = 81,920Mb If you take an 'average' CD of 600 Mb then that's just over 136 CDs for WAV (which I'm presuming it is) files. There are three levels of compression (128/192/320 KB) available, I gather - so there would be the opportunity to store a lot more albums than that...?? It would seem so. Trying my most difficult one - solo piano - I just settled on the maximum. I won't need *that* many in it anyway - the filing system isn't of the best. Or probably just the display. To find things fast you'd need a bigger screen. I'd find that a drawback. I'm on the cusp of getting rid of all my CDs - I don't think I've played one for over a year. I just rip them to a computer wired up to the hifi/telly. For £80 i'd be tempted to rip the lid of and try and cram something HUGE in there. Yes, if it would recognise a 500 Gig disk and *could handle* that many files it would be an awsome resource for not a lot of money, Indeed - I'd give it a whirl ... but the matching Acoustic Solutions CD player (which is perfectly OK sonically) can get confused with large numbers of MP3s on a CDRW, I believe. I recall that the one I have here will start to miss off a few seconds of each of the tracks, if it is subjected to a lot of button-pressing and skipping about on the remote...?? .... even if these things fall over a little on the software side IME. Their gear seems to be a mixture of bought in basics and home grown interfaces. So if you can get the information on the bought in stuff it might be possible. I've not looked inside it yet. It will re-format a drive, though. If you find out if they can take bigger HDs, and the file system, it'd be interesting. |
Simple systems with a HDD
In article , Dave Plowman (News)
writes In article , tony sayer wrote: Incidentally on the DAB thing I'm well impressed with the DAB car radio. Drove from S London to Lincoln and back with it rock solid the whole way listening to R4 and R7 - and crisp and clear unlike FM under the same sort of conditions. It even seems to hang on longer going through tunnels. Glad you like the sound of DABble Dave;!.... If that's what it sounds like to you - you need to get a decent aerial. ;-) Got plenty of those!.. And in the car it sounds far better than the splashy sibilants I got on both the previous radio and the posh one in the other car, much of the time. Nuances like sound stage ain't quite so important. Funny but both our cars sound fine!.. FWIW, the more criticism I hear about current DAB the more I wonder about those making it (mainly Mr DAB sounds worse than anything). Standards are lowering all the time.. The differences between it and FM are fairly subtle on the things I listen to whereas multipath and the effects of a decoder trying to get a decent sig to noise on a car setup are anything but. Not everybody lives in the wrong bit of London;!.. I note also that Mr Lesurf doesn't seem to find it quite as horrendous as many here claim. ;-) Age related? ;).... -- Tony Sayer |
Simple systems with a HDD
In article ,
tony sayer wrote: And in the car it sounds far better than the splashy sibilants I got on both the previous radio and the posh one in the other car, much of the time. Nuances like sound stage ain't quite so important. Funny but both our cars sound fine!.. I wonder if they would do round my test route... -- Dave Plowman London SW To e-mail, change noise into sound. |
Simple systems with a HDD
In article , Dave Plowman (News)
writes In article , tony sayer wrote: And in the car it sounds far better than the splashy sibilants I got on both the previous radio and the posh one in the other car, much of the time. Nuances like sound stage ain't quite so important. Funny but both our cars sound fine!.. I wonder if they would do round my test route... Which is where exactly?.. -- Tony Sayer |
All times are GMT. The time now is 09:04 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.0.0
Copyright ©2004-2006 AudioBanter.co.uk