On Tue, 29 May 2007 09:08:36 -0500, John Byrns
wrote:

In article m,
Andre Jute wrote:

Hey, Scott, since you're such a pal of the little netstalker Worthless
Wieckless aka Peter Wieck, why don't you ask him to prove his newly
invented contention that what I write is "idiotic and best and quite
dangerous at worst" (sic). All we've seen from Wieckless to me in the
18 months he has been on RAT is 211 personally abusive messages with
zero technical content, so I ignored him as merely another little
useless stalker trying to fatten up his own image by attacks on a
star. When after 18 months it was time to take him out, I merely
played by the rules Worthless Wieckless himself made which, as I
explained to Phil B, were about identity confusion.

Hi Andre,

Notice that following his "apology" Wiecky has pretty much withdrawn
from posting, excepting a few weak defenses of his "apology". I suspect
that this stems from Peter's realization that he had shot himself in the
foot with his constant attacks on you, and that he had done his own
reputation more harm than he was able to do to you, his intended target.
Weakened from loss of blood due to the foot wound, and suffering from
extreme embarrassment as a result of his heavy handed attempts to
discredit you, he seems to have concocted his "apology" as an exit
strategy, and decided to lay low to give his reputation a chance to
recover.


Regards,

John Byrns


Maybe he is busy exploring the non business end of his mop handle?
__________________________________________________ __

For the folks that get confused when I post from different computers:

KE4ODD, Tracy Fort, Beerbarrel and whatever the hell else you want to call me are all the same person!....ME!