The Worthless Wieckless trashroll of errors accelerates, was fa single ended stereo tube amp
 

John Byrns wrote:
In article .com,
Peter Wieck wrote:

On May 24, 8:23 am, "hydebee" wrote:
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll...m=150125684898

What makes you think this is "single-ended" and not PP? 2 x 6BQ5 and
that it is a Magnavox strongly suggests a PP configuration.

Peter, have you lost all your marbles, are you blind, or both?

Being bled out, as Worthless Wieckless was, robs the brain of blood
and thus oxygen. Result: zero thought (a familiar condition to
Wieckless!).

Add to that exsanguinated lassitude the distraction of being knackered
into Wiecklessness, what Gray Glasser so delicately describes as the
"unmanning" (1) of Worthless (heh-heh, Gray, you learned a lot from
observing me a couple of years, in particular to go directly for the
bal-- I mean the jugular! LOL!), and you can see how the Worthless
trashroll of errors will pile up even faster from now onwards.


The photos show two input jacks, and two output transformers, isn't that
strongly suggestive of it being a stereo amp, in which case it doesn't
have enough tubes for it to be anything but "single-ended", PP would
require 4 x 6BQ5.

You reward might be in another world, John, but here on earth I've
long since given up explaining to Wieckless as a waste of time.

It isn't as if Worthless Wieckless, even before I bled him even dumber
and then knackered him, were (2) even remotely knowledgeable. He
didn't know what ballasts do, he thought resistors dissipate to their
power limit regardless of the actual amount of current through them,
he earlier gave another wretched display of mistaking an SE amp for
PP, and much, much more of his dire ignorance. Besides ignorance,
Wieckless is a nasty little ingrate whose idea of thanks is dully
unimaginative abuse liberally layered over his benefactor.

Regards,

John Byrns

--
Surf my web pages at, http://fmamradios.com/

Andre Jute
No real corpses were harmed in the assembly of my golem Worthless
Wieckless
-- CE Statement of Conformity

(1) Hey, Gray, I loved the double entendre of "unmanned" to imply both
the fact that my golem Wieckless is a mule which cannot breed and
that, to make doubly sure the offal I stuffed into the sock to make
the puppet doesn't replicate to stink us out, I knocked the bricks on
his testicles. For the rest of you, Gray considers words with leery
cynicism because that's his job, but those of you who have dreams of
being writers, or even stylists, or even the modest (ha!) ambition of
going head to head with Lord Valve and winning just once, even a
little one (it's harder than you think), ask yourselves if you caught
that reference unaided. Those who did can be wits, perhaps even
writers; the rest will at best be audiophiles forever.

(2) sic; those who don't grasp the beauty of grammar, refer to Fowler

The Worthless Wieckless trashroll of errors accelerates, was fa single ended stereo tube amp
 

On May 24, 5:13 pm, Andre Jute wrote:
John Byrns wrote:
In article .com,
Peter Wieck wrote:

On May 24, 8:23 am, "hydebee" wrote:
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll...m=150125684898

What makes you think this is "single-ended" and not PP? 2 x 6BQ5 and
that it is a Magnavox strongly suggests a PP configuration.

Peter, have you lost all your marbles, are you blind, or both?

Being bled out, as Worthless Wieckless was, robs the brain of blood
and thus oxygen. Result: zero thought (a familiar condition to
Wieckless!).

Add to that exsanguinated lassitude the distraction of being knackered
into Wiecklessness, what Gray Glasser so delicately describes as the
"unmanning" (1) of Worthless (heh-heh, Gray, you learned a lot from
observing me a couple of years, in particular to go directly for the
bal-- I mean the jugular! LOL!), and you can see how the Worthless
trashroll of errors will pile up even faster from now onwards.

The photos show two input jacks, and two output transformers, isn't that
strongly suggestive of it being a stereo amp, in which case it doesn't
have enough tubes for it to be anything but "single-ended", PP would
require 4 x 6BQ5.

You reward might be in another world, John, but here on earth I've
long since given up explaining to Wieckless as a waste of time.

It isn't as if Worthless Wieckless, even before I bled him even dumber
and then knackered him, were (2) even remotely knowledgeable. He
didn't know what ballasts do, he thought resistors dissipate to their
power limit regardless of the actual amount of current through them,
he earlier gave another wretched display of mistaking an SE amp for
PP, and much, much more of his dire ignorance. Besides ignorance,
Wieckless is a nasty little ingrate whose idea of thanks is dully
unimaginative abuse liberally layered over his benefactor.

Regards,

John Byrns

--
Surf my web pages at, http://fmamradios.com/

Andre Jute
No real corpses were harmed in the assembly of my golem Worthless
Wieckless
-- CE Statement of Conformity

(1) Hey, Gray, I loved the double entendre of "unmanned" to imply both
the fact that my golem Wieckless is a mule which cannot breed and
that, to make doubly sure the offal I stuffed into the sock to make
the puppet doesn't replicate to stink us out, I knocked the bricks on
his testicles. For the rest of you, Gray considers words with leery
cynicism because that's his job, but those of you who have dreams of
being writers, or even stylists, or even the modest (ha!) ambition of
going head to head with Lord Valve and winning just once, even a
little one (it's harder than you think), ask yourselves if you caught
that reference unaided. Those who did can be wits, perhaps even
writers; the rest will at best be audiophiles forever.

(2) sic; those who don't grasp the beauty of grammar, refer to Fowler

Ittsssssss BAAAAcccckkkk.....

I knew that it could not ever really 'leave the building'. That would
be too good to be true even in the most perfect of all worlds.

Hey, McCoy... we are all given to making mistakes. When will you admit
to your first?

Peter Wieck
Wyncote, PA

The Worthless Wieckless trashroll of errors accelerates, was fa single ended stereo tube amp
 

On 24 May 2007 15:36:20 -0700, Peter Wieck wrote:

On May 24, 5:13 pm, Andre Jute wrote:
John Byrns wrote:
In article .com,
Peter Wieck wrote:

On May 24, 8:23 am, "hydebee" wrote:
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll...m=150125684898

What makes you think this is "single-ended" and not PP? 2 x 6BQ5 and
that it is a Magnavox strongly suggests a PP configuration.

Peter, have you lost all your marbles, are you blind, or both?

Being bled out, as Worthless Wieckless was, robs the brain of blood
and thus oxygen. Result: zero thought (a familiar condition to
Wieckless!).

Add to that exsanguinated lassitude the distraction of being knackered
into Wiecklessness, what Gray Glasser so delicately describes as the
"unmanning" (1) of Worthless (heh-heh, Gray, you learned a lot from
observing me a couple of years, in particular to go directly for the
bal-- I mean the jugular! LOL!), and you can see how the Worthless
trashroll of errors will pile up even faster from now onwards.

The photos show two input jacks, and two output transformers, isn't that
strongly suggestive of it being a stereo amp, in which case it doesn't
have enough tubes for it to be anything but "single-ended", PP would
require 4 x 6BQ5.

You reward might be in another world, John, but here on earth I've
long since given up explaining to Wieckless as a waste of time.

It isn't as if Worthless Wieckless, even before I bled him even dumber
and then knackered him, were (2) even remotely knowledgeable. He
didn't know what ballasts do, he thought resistors dissipate to their
power limit regardless of the actual amount of current through them,
he earlier gave another wretched display of mistaking an SE amp for
PP, and much, much more of his dire ignorance. Besides ignorance,
Wieckless is a nasty little ingrate whose idea of thanks is dully
unimaginative abuse liberally layered over his benefactor.

Regards,

John Byrns

--
Surf my web pages at, http://fmamradios.com/

Andre Jute
No real corpses were harmed in the assembly of my golem Worthless
Wieckless
-- CE Statement of Conformity

(1) Hey, Gray, I loved the double entendre of "unmanned" to imply both
the fact that my golem Wieckless is a mule which cannot breed and
that, to make doubly sure the offal I stuffed into the sock to make
the puppet doesn't replicate to stink us out, I knocked the bricks on
his testicles. For the rest of you, Gray considers words with leery
cynicism because that's his job, but those of you who have dreams of
being writers, or even stylists, or even the modest (ha!) ambition of
going head to head with Lord Valve and winning just once, even a
little one (it's harder than you think), ask yourselves if you caught
that reference unaided. Those who did can be wits, perhaps even
writers; the rest will at best be audiophiles forever.

(2) sic; those who don't grasp the beauty of grammar, refer to Fowler

Ittsssssss BAAAAcccckkkk.....

I knew that it could not ever really 'leave the building'. That would
be too good to be true even in the most perfect of all worlds.

Hey, McCoy... we are all given to making mistakes. When will you admit
to your first?

Peter Wieck
Wyncote, PA


Remember Peter the Great? We have Peter the idiot!
__________________________________________________ __

For the folks that get confused when I post from different computers:

KE4ODD, Tracy Fort, Beerbarrel and whatever the hell else you want to call me are all the same person!....ME!

The Worthless Wieckless trashroll of errors accelerates, was fa single ended stereo tube amp
 

How did all these sock puppet losers and their 6L6 variants find this forum?

They should all return to, rec.audio.tubes before some of the resident
Rottweilers on this forum eat them for breakfast!

Omer


"KE4ODD" wrote in message
...
On 24 May 2007 15:36:20 -0700, Peter Wieck wrote:

On May 24, 5:13 pm, Andre Jute wrote:
John Byrns wrote:
In article .com,
Peter Wieck wrote:

On May 24, 8:23 am, "hydebee" wrote:
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll...m=150125684898

What makes you think this is "single-ended" and not PP? 2 x 6BQ5 and
that it is a Magnavox strongly suggests a PP configuration.

Peter, have you lost all your marbles, are you blind, or both?

Being bled out, as Worthless Wieckless was, robs the brain of blood
and thus oxygen. Result: zero thought (a familiar condition to
Wieckless!).

Add to that exsanguinated lassitude the distraction of being knackered
into Wiecklessness, what Gray Glasser so delicately describes as the
"unmanning" (1) of Worthless (heh-heh, Gray, you learned a lot from
observing me a couple of years, in particular to go directly for the
bal-- I mean the jugular! LOL!), and you can see how the Worthless
trashroll of errors will pile up even faster from now onwards.

The photos show two input jacks, and two output transformers, isn't
that
strongly suggestive of it being a stereo amp, in which case it doesn't
have enough tubes for it to be anything but "single-ended", PP would
require 4 x 6BQ5.

You reward might be in another world, John, but here on earth I've
long since given up explaining to Wieckless as a waste of time.

It isn't as if Worthless Wieckless, even before I bled him even dumber
and then knackered him, were (2) even remotely knowledgeable. He
didn't know what ballasts do, he thought resistors dissipate to their
power limit regardless of the actual amount of current through them,
he earlier gave another wretched display of mistaking an SE amp for
PP, and much, much more of his dire ignorance. Besides ignorance,
Wieckless is a nasty little ingrate whose idea of thanks is dully
unimaginative abuse liberally layered over his benefactor.

Regards,

John Byrns

--
Surf my web pages at, http://fmamradios.com/

Andre Jute
No real corpses were harmed in the assembly of my golem Worthless
Wieckless
-- CE Statement of Conformity

(1) Hey, Gray, I loved the double entendre of "unmanned" to imply both
the fact that my golem Wieckless is a mule which cannot breed and
that, to make doubly sure the offal I stuffed into the sock to make
the puppet doesn't replicate to stink us out, I knocked the bricks on
his testicles. For the rest of you, Gray considers words with leery
cynicism because that's his job, but those of you who have dreams of
being writers, or even stylists, or even the modest (ha!) ambition of
going head to head with Lord Valve and winning just once, even a
little one (it's harder than you think), ask yourselves if you caught
that reference unaided. Those who did can be wits, perhaps even
writers; the rest will at best be audiophiles forever.

(2) sic; those who don't grasp the beauty of grammar, refer to Fowler

Ittsssssss BAAAAcccckkkk.....

I knew that it could not ever really 'leave the building'. That would
be too good to be true even in the most perfect of all worlds.

Hey, McCoy... we are all given to making mistakes. When will you admit
to your first?

Peter Wieck
Wyncote, PA


Remember Peter the Great? We have Peter the idiot!
__________________________________________________ __

For the folks that get confused when I post from different computers:

KE4ODD, Tracy Fort, Beerbarrel and whatever the hell else you want to call
me are all the same person!....ME!

The Worthless Wieckless trashroll of errors accelerates, was fa single ended stereo tube amp
 

Omer Suleimanagich wrote:
How did all these sock puppet losers and their 6L6 variants find this forum?

Ooh, you're so macho, Omer. The other guy on these conferences who
worries about his masculinity, Bret Ludwig, also takes target practice
with 6L6. I'm pretty poncey myself, having taught my son to shoot at
Mullard EL34 lined up on the wall, giving him a candy every time he
popped 16 in a row (about that time, just before he had his first
birthday, the boy got his first computer and stopped thinking in
dozens; 16 is apparently 2*4).

They should all return to, rec.audio.tubes before some of the resident
Rottweilers on this forum eat them for breakfast!

Rotweilers cut into good steaks but are a bit small, you know. I'll
tell you what, lions smell high and their meat is just about pre-
hung.

Throw in a few lions, the Christians are hungry.

Omer

Go on, Omer, tell me you aren't as recklessly self-destructive as you
sound: tell me you're a spotty teenager with his dick in his hand and
perhaps I can persuade most of my guys to overlook your impertinence.

Andre Jute
You know you're middle-aged when the best overheard conversations
aren't about sex but about food. You know you're old when the best
overheard conversations are about gardening.

"KE4ODD" wrote in message
...
On 24 May 2007 15:36:20 -0700, Peter Wieck wrote:

On May 24, 5:13 pm, Andre Jute wrote:
John Byrns wrote:
In article .com,
Peter Wieck wrote:

On May 24, 8:23 am, "hydebee" wrote:
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll...m=150125684898

What makes you think this is "single-ended" and not PP? 2 x 6BQ5 and
that it is a Magnavox strongly suggests a PP configuration.

Peter, have you lost all your marbles, are you blind, or both?

Being bled out, as Worthless Wieckless was, robs the brain of blood
and thus oxygen. Result: zero thought (a familiar condition to
Wieckless!).

Add to that exsanguinated lassitude the distraction of being knackered
into Wiecklessness, what Gray Glasser so delicately describes as the
"unmanning" (1) of Worthless (heh-heh, Gray, you learned a lot from
observing me a couple of years, in particular to go directly for the
bal-- I mean the jugular! LOL!), and you can see how the Worthless
trashroll of errors will pile up even faster from now onwards.

The photos show two input jacks, and two output transformers, isn't
that
strongly suggestive of it being a stereo amp, in which case it doesn't
have enough tubes for it to be anything but "single-ended", PP would
require 4 x 6BQ5.

You reward might be in another world, John, but here on earth I've
long since given up explaining to Wieckless as a waste of time.

It isn't as if Worthless Wieckless, even before I bled him even dumber
and then knackered him, were (2) even remotely knowledgeable. He
didn't know what ballasts do, he thought resistors dissipate to their
power limit regardless of the actual amount of current through them,
he earlier gave another wretched display of mistaking an SE amp for
PP, and much, much more of his dire ignorance. Besides ignorance,
Wieckless is a nasty little ingrate whose idea of thanks is dully
unimaginative abuse liberally layered over his benefactor.

Regards,

John Byrns

--
Surf my web pages at, http://fmamradios.com/

Andre Jute
No real corpses were harmed in the assembly of my golem Worthless
Wieckless
-- CE Statement of Conformity

(1) Hey, Gray, I loved the double entendre of "unmanned" to imply both
the fact that my golem Wieckless is a mule which cannot breed and
that, to make doubly sure the offal I stuffed into the sock to make
the puppet doesn't replicate to stink us out, I knocked the bricks on
his testicles. For the rest of you, Gray considers words with leery
cynicism because that's his job, but those of you who have dreams of
being writers, or even stylists, or even the modest (ha!) ambition of
going head to head with Lord Valve and winning just once, even a
little one (it's harder than you think), ask yourselves if you caught
that reference unaided. Those who did can be wits, perhaps even
writers; the rest will at best be audiophiles forever.

(2) sic; those who don't grasp the beauty of grammar, refer to Fowler

Ittsssssss BAAAAcccckkkk.....

I knew that it could not ever really 'leave the building'. That would
be too good to be true even in the most perfect of all worlds.

Hey, McCoy... we are all given to making mistakes. When will you admit
to your first?

Peter Wieck
Wyncote, PA


Remember Peter the Great? We have Peter the idiot!
__________________________________________________ __

For the folks that get confused when I post from different computers:

KE4ODD, Tracy Fort, Beerbarrel and whatever the hell else you want to call
me are all the same person!....ME!

The Worthless Wieckless trashroll of errors accelerates, was fa single ended stereo tube amp
 

"Peter Wieck" wrote in message
oups.com...
On May 24, 5:13 pm, Andre Jute wrote:
John Byrns wrote:
In article .com,
Peter Wieck wrote:

On May 24, 8:23 am, "hydebee" wrote:
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll...m=150125684898

What makes you think this is "single-ended" and not PP? 2 x 6BQ5 and
that it is a Magnavox strongly suggests a PP configuration.

Peter, have you lost all your marbles, are you blind, or both?

Being bled out, as Worthless Wieckless was, robs the brain of blood
and thus oxygen. Result: zero thought (a familiar condition to
Wieckless!).

Add to that exsanguinated lassitude the distraction of being knackered
into Wiecklessness, what Gray Glasser so delicately describes as the
"unmanning" (1) of Worthless (heh-heh, Gray, you learned a lot from
observing me a couple of years, in particular to go directly for the
bal-- I mean the jugular! LOL!), and you can see how the Worthless
trashroll of errors will pile up even faster from now onwards.

The photos show two input jacks, and two output transformers, isn't
that
strongly suggestive of it being a stereo amp, in which case it doesn't
have enough tubes for it to be anything but "single-ended", PP would
require 4 x 6BQ5.

You reward might be in another world, John, but here on earth I've
long since given up explaining to Wieckless as a waste of time.

It isn't as if Worthless Wieckless, even before I bled him even dumber
and then knackered him, were (2) even remotely knowledgeable. He
didn't know what ballasts do, he thought resistors dissipate to their
power limit regardless of the actual amount of current through them,
he earlier gave another wretched display of mistaking an SE amp for
PP, and much, much more of his dire ignorance. Besides ignorance,
Wieckless is a nasty little ingrate whose idea of thanks is dully
unimaginative abuse liberally layered over his benefactor.

Regards,

John Byrns

--
Surf my web pages at, http://fmamradios.com/

Andre Jute
No real corpses were harmed in the assembly of my golem Worthless
Wieckless
-- CE Statement of Conformity

(1) Hey, Gray, I loved the double entendre of "unmanned" to imply both
the fact that my golem Wieckless is a mule which cannot breed and
that, to make doubly sure the offal I stuffed into the sock to make
the puppet doesn't replicate to stink us out, I knocked the bricks on
his testicles. For the rest of you, Gray considers words with leery
cynicism because that's his job, but those of you who have dreams of
being writers, or even stylists, or even the modest (ha!) ambition of
going head to head with Lord Valve and winning just once, even a
little one (it's harder than you think), ask yourselves if you caught
that reference unaided. Those who did can be wits, perhaps even
writers; the rest will at best be audiophiles forever.

(2) sic; those who don't grasp the beauty of grammar, refer to Fowler

Ittsssssss BAAAAcccckkkk.....

I knew that it could not ever really 'leave the building'. That would
be too good to be true even in the most perfect of all worlds.

Hey, McCoy... we are all given to making mistakes. When will you admit
to your first?

I don't know when the Boss' first mistake was, but I know his latest one ...
that was not easing up on you when you obviously had enough. I bet your dog
doesn't even recognize you anymore. Brutal, ugly, one sided massacre. Take
my advice and please don't mess around anymore with the Boss or high
voltage...

west

Peter Wieck
Wyncote, PA

The Worthless Wieckless trashroll of errors accelerates, was fa single ended stereo tube amp
 

On May 24, 7:38 pm, "Omer Suleimanagich"
wrote:
How did all these sock puppet losers and their 6L6 variants find this forum?

Somebody apparently left the door open.

Jeff

The Worthless Wieckless trashroll of errors accelerates, was fa single ended stereo tube amp
 

All this over a piece of **** Magnavox chassis that should have been
scrapped as a favor to good sound.

The Worthless Wieckless trashroll of errors accelerates, was fa single ended stereo tube amp
 

On May 24, 7:38 pm, "Omer Suleimanagich"
wrote:
How did all these sock puppet losers and their 6L6 variants find this forum?

They should all return to, rec.audio.tubes before some of the resident
Rottweilers on this forum eat them for breakfast!

Omer

They all have Mad Cow Disease, let they writhe in pain and die quietly
ALONE.

The Worthless Wieckless trashroll of errors accelerates, was fa single ended stereo tube amp
 

On May 24, 8:25 pm, "west" wrote:
"Peter Wieck" wrote in message

oups.com...





On May 24, 5:13 pm, Andre Jute wrote:
John Byrns wrote:
In article .com,
Peter Wieck wrote:

On May 24, 8:23 am, "hydebee" wrote:
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll...m=150125684898

What makes you think this is "single-ended" and not PP? 2 x 6BQ5 and
that it is a Magnavox strongly suggests a PP configuration.

Peter, have you lost all your marbles, are you blind, or both?

Being bled out, as Worthless Wieckless was, robs the brain of blood
and thus oxygen. Result: zero thought (a familiar condition to
Wieckless!).

Add to that exsanguinated lassitude the distraction of being knackered
into Wiecklessness, what Gray Glasser so delicately describes as the
"unmanning" (1) of Worthless (heh-heh, Gray, you learned a lot from
observing me a couple of years, in particular to go directly for the
bal-- I mean the jugular! LOL!), and you can see how the Worthless
trashroll of errors will pile up even faster from now onwards.

The photos show two input jacks, and two output transformers, isn't
that
strongly suggestive of it being a stereo amp, in which case it doesn't
have enough tubes for it to be anything but "single-ended", PP would
require 4 x 6BQ5.

You reward might be in another world, John, but here on earth I've
long since given up explaining to Wieckless as a waste of time.

It isn't as if Worthless Wieckless, even before I bled him even dumber
and then knackered him, were (2) even remotely knowledgeable. He
didn't know what ballasts do, he thought resistors dissipate to their
power limit regardless of the actual amount of current through them,
he earlier gave another wretched display of mistaking an SE amp for
PP, and much, much more of his dire ignorance. Besides ignorance,
Wieckless is a nasty little ingrate whose idea of thanks is dully
unimaginative abuse liberally layered over his benefactor.

Regards,

John Byrns

--
Surf my web pages at, http://fmamradios.com/

Andre Jute
No real corpses were harmed in the assembly of my golem Worthless
Wieckless
-- CE Statement of Conformity

(1) Hey, Gray, I loved the double entendre of "unmanned" to imply both
the fact that my golem Wieckless is a mule which cannot breed and
that, to make doubly sure the offal I stuffed into the sock to make
the puppet doesn't replicate to stink us out, I knocked the bricks on
his testicles. For the rest of you, Gray considers words with leery
cynicism because that's his job, but those of you who have dreams of
being writers, or even stylists, or even the modest (ha!) ambition of
going head to head with Lord Valve and winning just once, even a
little one (it's harder than you think), ask yourselves if you caught
that reference unaided. Those who did can be wits, perhaps even
writers; the rest will at best be audiophiles forever.

(2) sic; those who don't grasp the beauty of grammar, refer to Fowler

Ittsssssss BAAAAcccckkkk.....

I knew that it could not ever really 'leave the building'. That would
be too good to be true even in the most perfect of all worlds.

Hey, McCoy... we are all given to making mistakes. When will you admit
to your first?

I don't know when the Boss' first mistake was, but I know his latest one ...
that was not easing up on you when you obviously had enough. I bet your dog
doesn't even recognize you anymore. Brutal, ugly, one sided massacre. Take
my advice and please don't mess around anymore with the Boss or high
voltage...

west



Peter Wieck
Wyncote, PA

Big, fractured gasbags without an earnest lick of talent. PAH