John Byrns wrote:
In article m,
Andre Jute wrote:

Hey, Scott, since you're such a pal of the little netstalker Worthless
Wieckless aka Peter Wieck, why don't you ask him to prove his newly
invented contention that what I write is "idiotic and best and quite
dangerous at worst" (sic). All we've seen from Wieckless to me in the
18 months he has been on RAT is 211 personally abusive messages with
zero technical content, so I ignored him as merely another little
useless stalker trying to fatten up his own image by attacks on a
star. When after 18 months it was time to take him out, I merely
played by the rules Worthless Wieckless himself made which, as I
explained to Phil B, were about identity confusion.

Hi Andre,

Notice that following his "apology" Wiecky has pretty much withdrawn
from posting, excepting a few weak defenses of his "apology". I suspect
that this stems from Peter's realization that he had shot himself in the
foot with his constant attacks on you, and that he had done his own
reputation more harm than he was able to do to you, his intended target.
Weakened from loss of blood due to the foot wound, and suffering from
extreme embarrassment as a result of his heavy handed attempts to
discredit you, he seems to have concocted his "apology" as an exit
strategy, and decided to lay low to give his reputation a chance to
recover.


Regards,

John Byrns

--
Surf my web pages at, http://fmamradios.com/

Ha! Worthless Wieckless is certainly jumping around like a rousted
jack rabbit, farting like a twostroke in his fear. I thought the
purpose of the little janitor's 211 abusive messages about me over a
period of 18 months was to attract my attention. But the moment I
start paying attention to Worthless, he crumbles. Kenny the flatbilly
fundo is right: Wieckless is dickless, a sock stuffed with offal that
falls apart at the first push. As West pointed out, such a ones-sided
affair isn't pretty, so let's not drag it out. Flick! There goes
Wieckless off my thumb like snot.

I suppose the next time Pasternack tries to return to RAT I'd better
not be so hard on him that he runs away in short order. Otherwise, now
that Worthless is gone, where shall we find a whipping boy? I suppose
we could advertise on UKRA, where they seem to have a surplus of
masochists. But Pasternack, for all his faults (like lying on
professional matters for personal reasons), at least knows some
electronics and has decent grammar, which is a lot more than you can
say for Wieckless the janitor. (Hey, West, here's a piece of trivia
for you: the first person to use the blood sports analogy on RAT was
another janitor, one Ron Bales, later actually a distinguished member
of AGA, approved of by no less than Lord Valve.)

Gotta go take steam before dinner to soothe my muscles after a long
cycle. Somebody write to Pasternack that we miss him; don't be tempted
to go overboard and say that we love him -- even Plodnick isn't dumb
enough to believe that.

Andre Jute
Visit Jute on Amps at http://members.lycos.co.uk/fiultra/

STATUTORY DECLARATION
No real corpses were harmed in the assembly of Andre Jute's golem
Peter Wieck aka Worthless Wieckless --- CE Certificate of Conformity

| just die already

On May 29, 4:28 pm, Steven wrote:
| just die already- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -


It must be Steven.

Steven, you're as bad as any of them, STFU.

On May 29, 10:08 am, John Byrns wrote:
SNIP he seems to have concocted his "apology" as an exit
strategy, and decided to lay low to give his reputation a chance to
recover.

John:

After realizing that Mr. Jute is brain-damaged quite literally, my
ethics required giving him an apology. And given that his handicap is
permanent and apparently degenerating further, I will refrain from
further direct attacks out of pity.

You are the first to defend him, generally. You must have known him
before his strokes and/or seen direct physical evidence of his claims.
For those of us who have seen no such thing excepting those offerings
he has made here together with his pretty wild claims (such as a jack-
booted visit to Peter Drucker, walking up a mountain with a gentleman
4-years dead, a teen-age speech to the Knesset and more than a few
others), without the additional knowledge of his brain-damage he would
be a very difficult individual to take seriously. But at this point,
he must be taken 'as seriously as a stroke' with the attendant
necessary accommodations as one would for any other challenged person.

Peter Wieck
Wyncote, PA

On May 30, 2:08 pm, Peter Wieck wrote:
On May 29, 10:08 am, John Byrns wrote:

SNIP he seems to have concocted his "apology" as an exit
strategy, and decided to lay low to give his reputation a chance to
recover.

John:

After realizing that Mr. Jute is brain-damaged quite literally, my
ethics required giving him an apology. And given that his handicap is
permanent and apparently degenerating further, I will refrain from
further direct attacks out of pity.

You are the first to defend him, generally. You must have known him
before his strokes and/or seen direct physical evidence of his claims.
For those of us who have seen no such thing excepting those offerings
he has made here together with his pretty wild claims (such as a jack-
booted visit to Peter Drucker, walking up a mountain with a gentleman
4-years dead, a teen-age speech to the Knesset and more than a few
others), without the additional knowledge of his brain-damage he would
be a very difficult individual to take seriously. But at this point,
he must be taken 'as seriously as a stroke' with the attendant
necessary accommodations as one would for any other challenged person.

Peter Wieck
Wyncote, PA

I think worthless went cuckoo for coca puffs!

Again!

On Jun 3, 5:11 pm, beerbarrel wrote:
On May 30, 2:08 pm, Peter Wieck wrote:





On May 29, 10:08 am, John Byrns wrote:

SNIP he seems to have concocted his "apology" as an exit
strategy, and decided to lay low to give his reputation a chance to
recover.

John:

After realizing that Mr. Jute is brain-damaged quite literally, my
ethics required giving him an apology. And given that his handicap is
permanent and apparently degenerating further, I will refrain from
further direct attacks out of pity.

You are the first to defend him, generally. You must have known him
before his strokes and/or seen direct physical evidence of his claims.
For those of us who have seen no such thing excepting those offerings
he has made here together with his pretty wild claims (such as a jack-
booted visit to Peter Drucker, walking up a mountain with a gentleman
4-years dead, a teen-age speech to the Knesset and more than a few
others), without the additional knowledge of his brain-damage he would
be a very difficult individual to take seriously. But at this point,
he must be taken 'as seriously as a stroke' with the attendant
necessary accommodations as one would for any other challenged person.

Peter Wieck
Wyncote, PA

I think worthless went cuckoo for coca puffs!

Again!- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

And you? Apart from being a simple waste of air, water, food and
space, you sole objective in life appears to be nattering at the
ankles of your betters... Which would in this case include even the
likes of Skippy, Jute and Nudo as it happens.

Peter Wieck
Wyncote, PA

beerbarrel wrote:
On May 30, 2:08 pm, Peter Wieck wrote:
On May 29, 10:08 am, John Byrns wrote:

SNIP he seems to have concocted his "apology" as an exit
strategy, and decided to lay low to give his reputation a chance to
recover.

John:

After realizing that Mr. Jute is brain-damaged quite literally, my
ethics required giving him an apology. And given that his handicap is
permanent and apparently degenerating further, I will refrain from
further direct attacks out of pity.

You are the first to defend him, generally. You must have known him
before his strokes and/or seen direct physical evidence of his claims.
For those of us who have seen no such thing excepting those offerings
he has made here together with his pretty wild claims (such as a jack-
booted visit to Peter Drucker, walking up a mountain with a gentleman
4-years dead, a teen-age speech to the Knesset and more than a few
others), without the additional knowledge of his brain-damage he would
be a very difficult individual to take seriously. But at this point,
he must be taken 'as seriously as a stroke' with the attendant
necessary accommodations as one would for any other challenged person.

Peter Wieck
Wyncote, PA

I think worthless went cuckoo for coca puffs!

Again!

Stalkers like Worthless always claim to know more about their victims
than the victims know themselves. In the next stage the demented
stalker Worthless Wieckless will tell everyone he could have written
my books better than I did, and shortly afterwards he will start
claiming to have written my books, and then to be me. Just wait for
it.

How do I know? What really tipped me off (what would tip off a dead
psychologist) is a private letter I received from Worthless Wieckless
asking for a piece of my unlaundered clothing, preferably shorts.
Wieckless wrote, "Just the thought of you sending your autographed
book to West gave me the most seminal experience of my life, including
my wedding night." (Musta been a disappointing honeymoon. D'you reckon
Wieckless is a coca puff, like it says in Wieck*less*?)

I leave the rest to your imagination, and Worthless to your mercy. I
have no use for him.

Andre Jute
No real corpses were harmed in the assembly of my golem Worthless
Wieckless -- CE Statement of Conformity

On Jun 3, 8:45 pm, Andre Jute wrote:
beerbarrel wrote:
On May 30, 2:08 pm, Peter Wieck wrote:
On May 29, 10:08 am, John Byrns wrote:

SNIP he seems to have concocted his "apology" as an exit
strategy, and decided to lay low to give his reputation a chance to
recover.

John:

After realizing that Mr. Jute is brain-damaged quite literally, my
ethics required giving him an apology. And given that his handicap is
permanent and apparently degenerating further, I will refrain from
further direct attacks out of pity.

You are the first to defend him, generally. You must have known him
before his strokes and/or seen direct physical evidence of his claims.
For those of us who have seen no such thing excepting those offerings
he has made here together with his pretty wild claims (such as a jack-
booted visit to Peter Drucker, walking up a mountain with a gentleman
4-years dead, a teen-age speech to the Knesset and more than a few
others), without the additional knowledge of his brain-damage he would
be a very difficult individual to take seriously. But at this point,
he must be taken 'as seriously as a stroke' with the attendant
necessary accommodations as one would for any other challenged person.

Peter Wieck
Wyncote, PA

I think worthless went cuckoo for coca puffs!

Again!

Stalkers like Worthless always claim to know more about their victims
than the victims know themselves. In the next stage the demented
stalker Worthless Wieckless will tell everyone he could have written
my books better than I did, and shortly afterwards he will start
claiming to have written my books, and then to be me. Just wait for
it.

How do I know? What really tipped me off (what would tip off a dead
psychologist) is a private letter I received from Worthless Wieckless
asking for a piece of my unlaundered clothing, preferably shorts.
Wieckless wrote, "Just the thought of you sending your autographed
book to West gave me the most seminal experience of my life, including
my wedding night." (Musta been a disappointing honeymoon. D'you reckon
Wieckless is a coca puff, like it says in Wieck*less*?)

I leave the rest to your imagination, and Worthless to your mercy. I
have no use for him.

Andre Jute
No real corpses were harmed in the assembly of my golem Worthless
Wieckless -- CE Statement of Conformity- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Your right Andre. Wick is nothing more than a piece of garbage. You
can have the loser! I'll just call him the cocoa puff from now on.