![]() |
How can I tell music has been an MP3? Quantitative Measurement of Fidelity
In article ,
Scott Dorsey wrote: Strange - as this is exactly what the BBC did with direct cut discs before tape days. They used 33 rpm, but fixed pitch coarse groove. Yes, but they had to cut inside-out because they didn't have effective chip-chasers. Most US broadcasters did the same thing. Chip chaser? What that - not a term I'm familiar with. Note that for broadcast applications, you usually CAN predict when everything will end, down to the second. Didn't matter as it was common practice to overlap recordings using two cutters so any length of prog could be recorded. But in those days progs were recorded mainly for archive purposes rather than as a production tool - the vast majority were live. And in any case a 33rpm coarse groove disc didn't last long enough for most progs - IIRC about 15 minutes. -- *If love is blind, why is lingerie so popular? Dave Plowman London SW To e-mail, change noise into sound. |
How can I tell music has been an MP3? Quantitative Measurement of Fidelity
In article ,
Paul Stamler wrote: Some labels, including Pathe, did put out center-start records during the 78 era. Some radio transcriptions were done that way, too. And radio transcriptions of long shows were sometimes done alternating center-start and rim-start, so there would be no jarring change in sound quality as the operator switched from disc to disc. Interesting. Makes sense but never seen those. Of course it was before even my time in broadcasting. -- *If you think this van is dirty, you should try having sex with the driver* Dave Plowman London SW To e-mail, change noise into sound. |
How can I tell music has been an MP3? Quantitative Measurement of Fidelity
Dave Plowman (News) wrote:
In article , Scott Dorsey wrote: Strange - as this is exactly what the BBC did with direct cut discs before tape days. They used 33 rpm, but fixed pitch coarse groove. Yes, but they had to cut inside-out because they didn't have effective chip-chasers. Most US broadcasters did the same thing. Chip chaser? What that - not a term I'm familiar with. Okay, when you cut a lacquer, it displaces some material, and that material is called chip. The chip tends to curl inward toward the center of the record. If you cut inside-out, this is a non-issue, but if you cut outside-in, the stylus will run over its own chip unless you have a vacuum device or a brush to sweep it away. Today on modern lathes we have vacuum devices, and the chip is less prone to break up and fragment because of the hot-stylus system too. Note that for broadcast applications, you usually CAN predict when everything will end, down to the second. Didn't matter as it was common practice to overlap recordings using two cutters so any length of prog could be recorded. But in those days progs were recorded mainly for archive purposes rather than as a production tool - the vast majority were live. Right. And in any case a 33rpm coarse groove disc didn't last long enough for most progs - IIRC about 15 minutes. That's why RCA made cutting assemblies for 16" discs. Complete with nasty horrors like automatic diameter equalization... --scott -- "C'est un Nagra. C'est suisse, et tres, tres precis." |
How can I tell music has been an MP3? Quantitative Measurement of Fidelity
Marc Wielage wrote:
For some odd reason, there are people who foolishly convert MP3 files to FLAC (or APE), perhaps in the mistaken belief that it will make the signal "sound" better. Sounds like those who buy "tubed" CD players, thinking that the one tube stage at the player's output will somehow "fix" all the "harm" done to the signal by all the solid-state stuff. |
How can I tell music has been an MP3? Quantitative Measurement of Fidelity
"Markus Mietling" wrote in message ... Now that I read your story, it seems to me that the gracenote database must implement some seriously powerful pattern matching technology. Quite amazing, IMO. In fact it's because the allocated disk number is seriously simply derived from track numbers and lengths that it works. Not so amazing really. MrT. |
How can I tell music has been an MP3? Quantitative Measurement of Fidelity
"Paul Stamler" wrote in message ... Some labels, including Pathe, did put out center-start records during the 78 era. Some radio transcriptions were done that way, too. And radio transcriptions of long shows were sometimes done alternating center-start and rim-start, so there would be no jarring change in sound quality as the operator switched from disc to disc. I can just imagine that operator sometimes got confused which way was next then :-) Even if they are well marked, it's surely a recipe for disaster. MrT. |
How can I tell music has been an MP3? Quantitative Measurement of Fidelity
"Keith G" wrote Compressed audio like 'Classic FM' on a car radio works very well, actually.... Last night some solo piano pieces were particularly good on Carsick FM FM - very acceptable. (I couldn't compare with R3 because there was only some tiny little voices muttering away throughout my entire journey...) |
How can I tell music has been an MP3? Quantitative Measurement of Fidelity
"Mr.T" MrT@home wrote in message u... "Paul Stamler" wrote in message ... Some labels, including Pathe, did put out center-start records during the 78 era. Some radio transcriptions were done that way, too. And radio transcriptions of long shows were sometimes done alternating center-start and rim-start, so there would be no jarring change in sound quality as the operator switched from disc to disc. I can just imagine that operator sometimes got confused which way was next then :-) Even if they are well marked, it's surely a recipe for disaster. Not as confusing as numbering 2-disc sets of LPs 1/4 and 2/3 for public performance - where the playing order goes/went as follows: Stack the albums with sides in this order from the top: 1/4, 3/2 Play Side 1, flip both discs together Play Side 2, flip top disc only Play Side 3, remove top disc Play Side 4, remove disc, take bow, bring up house lights.... |
How can I tell music has been an MP3? Quantitative Measurement of Fidelity
On Tue, 26 Jun 2007 11:43:01 +0100, "Keith G"
wrote: "Mr.T" MrT@home wrote in message . au... "Paul Stamler" wrote in message ... Some labels, including Pathe, did put out center-start records during the 78 era. Some radio transcriptions were done that way, too. And radio transcriptions of long shows were sometimes done alternating center-start and rim-start, so there would be no jarring change in sound quality as the operator switched from disc to disc. I can just imagine that operator sometimes got confused which way was next then :-) Even if they are well marked, it's surely a recipe for disaster. Not as confusing as numbering 2-disc sets of LPs 1/4 and 2/3 for public performance - where the playing order goes/went as follows: Stack the albums with sides in this order from the top: 1/4, 3/2 Play Side 1, flip both discs together Play Side 2, flip top disc only Play Side 3, remove top disc Play Side 4, remove disc, take bow, bring up house lights.... Or for preference, have two decks, then: Play 1, cue up 2. Seamless handover at end of 1. etc etc.... Take even deeper bow. d -- Pearce Consulting http://www.pearce.uk.com |
How can I tell music has been an MP3? Quantitative Measurement of Fidelity
"dizzy" wrote in crossposted message ... Marc Wielage wrote: For some odd reason, there are people who foolishly convert MP3 files to FLAC (or APE), perhaps in the mistaken belief that it will make the signal "sound" better. Sounds like those who buy "tubed" CD players, thinking that the one tube stage at the player's output will somehow "fix" all the "harm" done to the signal by all the solid-state stuff. Why? Doesn't it? |
All times are GMT. The time now is 07:08 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.0.0
Copyright ©2004-2006 AudioBanter.co.uk