A Audio, hi-fi and car audio  forum. Audio Banter

Go Back   Home » Audio Banter forum » UK Audio Newsgroups » uk.rec.audio (General Audio and Hi-Fi)
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

uk.rec.audio (General Audio and Hi-Fi) (uk.rec.audio) Discussion and exchange of hi-fi audio equipment.

The product we've all been waiting for;!...



 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old June 27th 07, 11:58 AM posted to uk.rec.audio
tony sayer
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,042
Default The product we've all been waiting for;!...


http://www.shakti-innovations.com/audiovideo.htm
--
Tony Sayer



  #2 (permalink)  
Old June 27th 07, 01:36 PM posted to uk.rec.audio
Mike Gilmour
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 620
Default The product we've all been waiting for;!...


"tony sayer" wrote in message
...

http://www.shakti-innovations.com/audiovideo.htm
--
Tony Sayer





A very expensive lump of ferrite perhaps??


  #3 (permalink)  
Old June 27th 07, 02:43 PM posted to uk.rec.audio
Keith G
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 7,388
Default The product we've all been waiting for;!...


"tony sayer" wrote in message
...

http://www.shakti-innovations.com/audiovideo.htm
--



Never mind that nonsense, Tony - I'm still waiting to hear if an FM
signal strength of '55 dBf' as per:

http://www.apah69.dsl.pipex.com/show/Signal.JPG


Is reckoned to be 'good' (or 'good enough')...???

(Certainly sounds OK!!)


  #4 (permalink)  
Old June 27th 07, 04:06 PM posted to uk.rec.audio
Serge Auckland
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 509
Default The product we've all been waiting for;!...



"Keith G" wrote in message
...

"tony sayer" wrote in message
...

http://www.shakti-innovations.com/audiovideo.htm
--



Never mind that nonsense, Tony - I'm still waiting to hear if an FM signal
strength of '55 dBf' as per:

http://www.apah69.dsl.pipex.com/show/Signal.JPG


Is reckoned to be 'good' (or 'good enough')...???

(Certainly sounds OK!!)

Keith:-

If I haven't pressed any wrong tits on my calculator,

55dBf means 55dB above 1 femtowatt, or 10^12 watts
55dB is a power ratio of 3.16 x 10^5
so 55dBf is a power level of 0.316 microwatts.

Assuming a standard 75 ohm antenna, that translates to 4.87 mV, so I'd say
that was a pretty good signal.

S.

--
http://audiopages.googlepages.com



  #5 (permalink)  
Old June 27th 07, 05:03 PM posted to uk.rec.audio
tony sayer
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,042
Default The product we've all been waiting for;!...

In article , Serge Auckland
writes


"Keith G" wrote in message
...

"tony sayer" wrote in message
...

http://www.shakti-innovations.com/audiovideo.htm
--



Never mind that nonsense, Tony - I'm still waiting to hear if an FM signal
strength of '55 dBf' as per:

http://www.apah69.dsl.pipex.com/show/Signal.JPG


Is reckoned to be 'good' (or 'good enough')...???

(Certainly sounds OK!!)

Keith:-

If I haven't pressed any wrong tits on my calculator,

55dBf means 55dB above 1 femtowatt, or 10^12 watts
55dB is a power ratio of 3.16 x 10^5
so 55dBf is a power level of 0.316 microwatts.

Assuming a standard 75 ohm antenna, that translates to 4.87 mV, so I'd say
that was a pretty good signal.

S.

That tuner uses a common place audio demod chip just to drive the sig
and deviation meters!. They use a totally separate pulse count
discriminator for the audio .. and excellent it is too)
--
Tony Sayer


  #6 (permalink)  
Old June 27th 07, 08:38 PM posted to uk.rec.audio
Keith G
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 7,388
Default The product we've all been waiting for;!...


"tony sayer" wrote


That tuner uses a common place audio demod chip just to drive the sig
and deviation meters!. They use a totally separate pulse count
discriminator for the audio .. and excellent it is too)



Here's the plan, if you fancied running one up:

http://www.fmtunerinfo.com/KT-917schematic.pdf

:-)





  #7 (permalink)  
Old June 27th 07, 08:36 PM posted to uk.rec.audio
Keith G
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 7,388
Default The product we've all been waiting for;!...


"Serge Auckland" wrote in message
news


"Keith G" wrote in message
...

"tony sayer" wrote in message
...

http://www.shakti-innovations.com/audiovideo.htm
--



Never mind that nonsense, Tony - I'm still waiting to hear if an FM
signal strength of '55 dBf' as per:

http://www.apah69.dsl.pipex.com/show/Signal.JPG


Is reckoned to be 'good' (or 'good enough')...???

(Certainly sounds OK!!)

Keith:-

If I haven't pressed any wrong tits on my calculator,

55dBf means 55dB above 1 femtowatt, or 10^12 watts
55dB is a power ratio of 3.16 x 10^5
so 55dBf is a power level of 0.316 microwatts.

Assuming a standard 75 ohm antenna, that translates to 4.87 mV, so I'd
say that was a pretty good signal.



OK, good. Thanks for slogging that out Serge - I had wondered once or
twice if I'd got 'enough' aerial as a wee bit of hiss can creep in if
the signal drops as low as 40 dBf, which it can do occasionally.




  #8 (permalink)  
Old July 5th 07, 04:59 PM posted to uk.rec.audio
Keith G
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 7,388
Default The product we've all been waiting for;!...


"Serge Auckland" wrote in message
news


"Keith G" wrote


http://www.apah69.dsl.pipex.com/show/Signal.JPG


Is reckoned to be 'good' (or 'good enough')...???

(Certainly sounds OK!!)

Keith:-

If I haven't pressed any wrong tits on my calculator,

55dBf means 55dB above 1 femtowatt, or 10^12 watts
55dB is a power ratio of 3.16 x 10^5
so 55dBf is a power level of 0.316 microwatts.

Assuming a standard 75 ohm antenna, that translates to 4.87 mV, so I'd
say that was a pretty good signal.



Hi Serge - I found this in the manual a little earlier:

http://www.apah69.dsl.pipex.com/show/Voltages.JPG

(RTFM was never my strong suit!! ;-)

How does it sit with your figuring? There's a bit of a discrepancy - is
it easily explained?

(Just out of interest and FYI only - no bother whatsoever to me! :-)



  #9 (permalink)  
Old July 5th 07, 08:53 PM posted to uk.rec.audio
Serge Auckland
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 509
Default The product we've all been waiting for;!...



"Keith G" wrote in message
...

"Serge Auckland" wrote in message
news


"Keith G" wrote


http://www.apah69.dsl.pipex.com/show/Signal.JPG


Is reckoned to be 'good' (or 'good enough')...???

(Certainly sounds OK!!)

Keith:-

If I haven't pressed any wrong tits on my calculator,

55dBf means 55dB above 1 femtowatt, or 10^12 watts
55dB is a power ratio of 3.16 x 10^5
so 55dBf is a power level of 0.316 microwatts.

Assuming a standard 75 ohm antenna, that translates to 4.87 mV, so I'd
say that was a pretty good signal.



Hi Serge - I found this in the manual a little earlier:

http://www.apah69.dsl.pipex.com/show/Voltages.JPG

(RTFM was never my strong suit!! ;-)

How does it sit with your figuring? There's a bit of a discrepancy - is it
easily explained?

(Just out of interest and FYI only - no bother whatsoever to me! :-)


No, not easily explained.
Take the example of 50dBf = 86.5uV 75 ohm
86.5 uV into 75 ohms is a power level of 99.76 femtowatts, call it 100
femtowatts.
That would be 20dBf in my book *if* dBf means dBs relative to 1 femtowatt.

1 femtowatt is 10^-12 AFAIAC

Consequently, their dBf is not relative to 1 femtowatt, or their femtowatt
is not mine.

According to their figures, you would need a signal strength of better than
80 to get completely (audibly) noise-free audio.

Working back, 86.5uV /75 ohm is 50dB relative to 1 attowatt or 10^-15 watt

S.

--
http://audiopages.googlepages.com





  #10 (permalink)  
Old July 5th 07, 09:38 PM posted to uk.rec.audio
Fleetie
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 449
Default The product we've all been waiting for;!...

1 femtowatt is 10^-12 AFAIAC

"femto" is the prefix for 10^-15.


Martin
--
M.A.Poyser Tel.: 07967 110890
Manchester, U.K. http://www.livejournal.com/userinfo.bml?user=fleetie


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT. The time now is 08:55 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.SEO by vBSEO 3.0.0
Copyright ©2004-2025 Audio Banter.
The comments are property of their posters.