
August 30th 07, 02:41 PM
posted to rec.audio.opinion,rec.audio.tech,rec.audio.tubes,uk.rec.audio
|
|
Here we go again!
"Peter Wieck" wrote in message
ps.com...
On Aug 30, 9:46 am, "Arny Krueger" wrote:
Much obvious, but essentially meaningless stuff.
And those who like vinyl will continue to like it. And those who do
not will continue in their ways as well.
Says it all and I will not add to this thread again other than to say,
having been cornered into the position of 'Sole Defender Of Vinyl' in
UKRA in the recent past, all I ever sought was that a *small few* should
not have had it banned as an 'inadmissible audio topic' - no-one ever
said it was *compulsory*....
|

August 30th 07, 04:13 PM
posted to rec.audio.opinion,rec.audio.tech,rec.audio.tubes,uk.rec.audio
|
|
Here we go again!
Uuf Duh! As we say in Minnesota, well, northern Minnesota, anywho ...
It is wonderful to see you monkeys raping other peoples' hobby
horses  Such Elan! Perspicacity!
Meters can measure stuff very accurately, occasionally, if not every
last picosecond ... several were over before meters were even thunked
up, theoretically. Without meters, how can we know???
I listened to big, floor standing AM radio for years well below the
noise floor. Negative dynamic range? Sure, kids. OK, the ocassional
fake gun shot may have breached the surface, briefly ... unless there
was coincident events in the noise mix
Noise is not meaningful, hence the term: noise.
Signal to Noise Ratio and Noise to Signal Ratio are both measureable,
but, if you are listening to the Lone Ranger and Tonto planning to
outwit those Bad Guys, friends, nobody gives a RAT's ass, you should
pardon ...
I remember the Lone Ranger. I know there was noise, but, frankly, I
forgot it. You guys never have any fun.
Just keep pulling it.
Happy Ears!
Al
|

August 31st 07, 12:36 AM
posted to rec.audio.opinion,rec.audio.tech,rec.audio.tubes,uk.rec.audio
|
|
Here we go again!
"Keith G" wrote in message
...
Says it all and I will not add to this thread again other than to say,
having been cornered into the position of 'Sole Defender Of Vinyl' in
UKRA in the recent past, all I ever sought was that a *small few* should
not have had it banned as an 'inadmissible audio topic' - no-one ever
said it was *compulsory*....
But vinyl has NOT been banned. You are still welcome to buy it and listen to
it. What more do you need???
Others are just sick of hearing the same stupid arguments for 25 years!
MrT.
|

August 31st 07, 11:30 AM
posted to rec.audio.opinion,rec.audio.tech,rec.audio.tubes,uk.rec.audio
|
|
Here we go again!
"Mr.T" MrT@home wrote in message
u...
"Keith G" wrote in message
...
Says it all and I will not add to this thread again other than to say,
having been cornered into the position of 'Sole Defender Of Vinyl' in
UKRA in the recent past, all I ever sought was that a *small few* should
not have had it banned as an 'inadmissible audio topic' - no-one ever
said it was *compulsory*....
But vinyl has NOT been banned. You are still welcome to buy it and listen
to
it. What more do you need???
Others are just sick of hearing the same stupid arguments for 25 years!
Uh huh. So this is where you hang out these days, still banging the same old
anti-vinyl gong. Different newsgroup, same message. Not much changes, does
it T?
ruff
|

September 2nd 07, 07:35 AM
posted to rec.audio.opinion,rec.audio.tech,rec.audio.tubes,uk.rec.audio
|
|
Here we go again!
"roughplanet" wrote in message
u...
Uh huh. So this is where you hang out these days, still banging the same
old
anti-vinyl gong.
If I'm so anti vinyl, how come I still have over 1000 LP's?
Face it Ruff, *I* didn't start this or *ANY* other vinyl Vs digital debate.
Can you say the same?
Different newsgroup, same message. Not much changes, does
it T?
Nope, some people still can't accept that technology has actually improved.
MrT.
|

August 31st 07, 12:04 PM
posted to rec.audio.opinion,rec.audio.tech,rec.audio.tubes,uk.rec.audio
|
|
Here we go again!
"Mr.T" MrT@home wrote in message
u
"Keith G" wrote in message
...
Says it all and I will not add to this thread again
other than to say, having been cornered into the
position of 'Sole Defender Of Vinyl' in UKRA in the
recent past, all I ever sought was that a *small few*
should not have had it banned as an 'inadmissible audio
topic' - no-one ever said it was *compulsory*....
But vinyl has NOT been banned.
Agreed. Although the trite "I just bought a new LP" posts should be were
that to be possible.
You are still welcome to
buy it and listen to it. What more do you need???
Reinforcement that said activity makes him "special".
Others are just sick of hearing the same stupid arguments
for 25 years!
Arguments like those presented by Krakow, which are based on a complete
contradiction of established facts, get very tiring, very fact. The real
question is: "Is Krakow knowlegable enough to be lying"? Or, is he merely
mislead?
|

August 31st 07, 03:59 PM
posted to rec.audio.opinion,rec.audio.tech,rec.audio.tubes,uk.rec.audio
|
|
Here we go again!
"Keith G" wrote in message
"Arny Krueger" wrote in message
...
"Mr.T" MrT@home wrote in message
u
"Keith G" wrote in message
...
Says it all and I will not add to this thread again
other than to say, having been cornered into the
position of 'Sole Defender Of Vinyl' in UKRA in the
recent past, all I ever sought was that a *small few*
should not have had it banned as an 'inadmissible audio
topic' - no-one ever said it was *compulsory*....
But vinyl has NOT been banned.
Agreed. Although the trite "I just bought a new LP"
posts should be were that to be possible.
If you are talking about me I would be interested to see
such a post -
Not you, Keith. The offender knows who she is.
Is this another
example of the distortion you vinyl-bashers need to
reinforce your hopeless *antivinyl* arguments?
Vinyl-bashing?
I see playing vinyl for enjoyment sort of like riding in a horse-drawn
carriage for enjoyment.
For practical purposes, vinyl is like a tomb where some interesting music
is entrapped, but can be released if you want to do some work.
You are still welcome to
buy it and listen to it. What more do you need???
Reinforcement that said activity makes him "special".
Don't be so ridiculous, I'm fed up with seeing/hearing
everything being related to vinyl - all the way down to
CDs being made to look like 7 inch 45s....
Those funny black CDs tricked up to look like 45s are an interesting trip
down memory lane...
|

August 31st 07, 04:02 PM
posted to rec.audio.opinion,rec.audio.tech,rec.audio.tubes,uk.rec.audio
|
|
Here we go again!
In article ,
"Arny Krueger" wrote:
"Keith G" wrote in message
"Arny Krueger" wrote in message
...
"Mr.T" MrT@home wrote in message
u
"Keith G" wrote in message
...
Says it all and I will not add to this thread again
other than to say, having been cornered into the
position of 'Sole Defender Of Vinyl' in UKRA in the
recent past, all I ever sought was that a *small few*
should not have had it banned as an 'inadmissible audio
topic' - no-one ever said it was *compulsory*....
But vinyl has NOT been banned.
Agreed. Although the trite "I just bought a new LP"
posts should be were that to be possible.
If you are talking about me I would be interested to see
such a post -
Not you, Keith. The offender knows who she is.
I get excited about finding good music well recorded. I've posted maybe
5 or six such posts. I've also commented on finding good sounding CDs.
If you don't want to read about music, then don't. It's very simple.
|

August 31st 07, 05:01 PM
posted to rec.audio.opinion,rec.audio.tech,rec.audio.tubes,uk.rec.audio
|
|
Here we go again!
Jenn said to MusicHaterBorg:
If you don't want to read about music, then don't. It's very simple.
Rumor has it that a future release of Arnii's SnotWare™ will include a
logic loop that will allow him to ignore mentions of music. Until that
happens, though, the Beast will continue to react with violent revulsion
to all posts containing direct references to music.
--
"Music is irrelevant to audio."
A. Krooger (1998, 2001, 2003, 2004, 2006)
|
Thread Tools |
|
Display Modes |
Hybrid Mode
|
|