Peter Wieck wrote:

On Aug 30, 1:38 pm, John Byrns wrote:

I like them both, the LP has the edge in the information carrying
capacity of the jacket, while the CD has the edge in convenience.

Exactly. It is permitted to "like them both".

Indeed. Many of the arguments would stop if ignorant vinyl-lovers
would stop spewing their ignorance. Seems as though every half-wit
out there thinks they have sufficient knowledge of digital audio to
make bold statements about it's supposed limitations.

In article ,
dizzy wrote:

Peter Wieck wrote:

On Aug 30, 1:38 pm, John Byrns wrote:

I like them both, the LP has the edge in the information carrying
capacity of the jacket, while the CD has the edge in convenience.

Exactly. It is permitted to "like them both".

Indeed. Many of the arguments would stop if ignorant vinyl-lovers
would stop spewing their ignorance. Seems as though every half-wit
out there thinks they have sufficient knowledge of digital audio to
make bold statements about it's supposed limitations.

It would also be helpful if those here who accuse vinyl fans of saying
something would actually read the posts of those individuals.

"Jenn" wrote ...
dizzy wrote:
Indeed. Many of the arguments would stop if ignorant vinyl-lovers
would stop spewing their ignorance. Seems as though every half-wit
out there thinks they have sufficient knowledge of digital audio to
make bold statements about it's supposed limitations.

It would also be helpful if those here who accuse vinyl fans of saying
something would actually read the posts of those individuals.

There's no lack of outrageous and ignorant claims made by
vinyl-fanatics.

In article ,
"Richard Crowley" wrote:

"Jenn" wrote ...
dizzy wrote:
Indeed. Many of the arguments would stop if ignorant vinyl-lovers
would stop spewing their ignorance. Seems as though every half-wit
out there thinks they have sufficient knowledge of digital audio to
make bold statements about it's supposed limitations.

It would also be helpful if those here who accuse vinyl fans of saying
something would actually read the posts of those individuals.

There's no lack of outrageous and ignorant claims made by
vinyl-fanatics.

Of course, but my point stands.

"Jenn" wrote in message
news:jennconductsREMOVETHIS-
There's no lack of outrageous and ignorant claims made by
vinyl-fanatics.

Of course, but my point stands.

You don't have a point though, only an opinion. You are entitled to it of
course, but how many times do we need to be told you have one?
Who really cares?
You admit you don't care about other opinions either, so surely that is the
end of the argument?

MrT.

Mr.**** said:

You admit you don't care about other opinions either, so surely that is the
end of the argument?

You misspoke again, ****. The corrected version reads "You, like other
enlightened individuals, are perfectly justified in ignoring the
opinions of gibbering baboons."

If the shoe fits.....

"George M. Middius" cmndr _ george @ comcast . net wrote in message
...
You, like other
enlightened individuals, are perfectly justified in ignoring the
opinions of gibbering baboons."

Thank you, I will.

MrT.

In article ,
"Mr.T" MrT@home wrote:

"Jenn" wrote in message
news:jennconductsREMOVETHIS-
There's no lack of outrageous and ignorant claims made by
vinyl-fanatics.

Of course, but my point stands.

You don't have a point though, only an opinion.

No, the point of my post (which you cut) is very clear: It would also
be helpful if those here who accuse vinyl fans of saying something would
actually read the posts of those individuals. Your posts to me and the
bogus thing you accuse me of are perfect cases making my point.

You are entitled to it of
course, but how many times do we need to be told you have one?
Who really cares?

Here's a question for you: In, say, the past year, other than around
three brief posts about a specific LP that I found, how many times have
I offered an opinion about LPs other than in response to someone else,
mainly Arny?

You admit you don't care about other opinions either,

Incorrect.

so surely that is the
end of the argument?

MrT.

"Jenn" wrote in message

om...
Of course, but my point stands.

You don't have a point though, only an opinion.

No, the point of my post (which you cut)

No I didn't.

is very clear:

In your mind maybe. Still have no idea what it is.

It would also
be helpful if those here who accuse vinyl fans of saying something would
actually read the posts of those individuals. Your posts to me and the
bogus thing you accuse me of are perfect cases making my point.

Which is?

You are entitled to it of
course, but how many times do we need to be told you have one?
Who really cares?

Here's a question for you: In, say, the past year, other than around
three brief posts about a specific LP that I found, how many times have
I offered an opinion about LPs other than in response to someone else,
mainly Arny?

No idea, why would I know or care?

You admit you don't care about other opinions either,

Incorrect.

What part of "And I couldn't give a rat's what YOU prefer either." is
incorrect?

MrT.

"Jenn" wrote in
message


No, the point of my post (which you cut) is very clear:
It would also be helpful if those here who accuse vinyl
fans of saying something would actually read the posts of
those individuals.

I read your posts, Jenn. Unfortunately they chronicle your futile search for
meaning. Here's a friendly hint - you probably won't find it in a store that
sells LPs, or while sitting next to your turntable daydreaming.