In article ,
"Arny Krueger" wrote:

"Jenn" wrote in
message

In article ,
dizzy wrote:

Peter Wieck wrote:

On Aug 30, 1:38 pm, John Byrns
wrote:

I like them both, the LP has the edge in the
information carrying capacity of the jacket, while the
CD has the edge in convenience.

Exactly. It is permitted to "like them both".

Indeed. Many of the arguments would stop if ignorant
vinyl-lovers would stop spewing their ignorance. Seems
as though every half-wit out there thinks they have
sufficient knowledge of digital audio to make bold
statements about it's supposed limitations.

It would also be helpful if those here who accuse vinyl
fans of saying something would actually read the posts of
those individuals.

No Jenn you've got it all wrong. We're accusing vinyl fans of distorting
established scientific facts to support their delusional position that the
best sounding LPs sound more lifelike than a well-made CD.

You've missed the point yet again. My point is that I've distorted
NOTHING. You and Mr. T can keep distorting my statements any way you
wish to. I "pity the fools" who can read simple posts.

"Jenn" wrote in message
...
In article ,
"Arny Krueger" foamed at the mouth and said:


No Jenn you've got it all wrong. We're accusing vinyl fans of
distorting
established scientific facts to support their delusional position
that the
best sounding LPs sound more lifelike than a well-made CD.


Note the 'we' again - not one of these *types* has got the ******** to
stand up and speak only for himself...



You've missed the point yet again. My point is that I've distorted
NOTHING. You and Mr. T can keep distorting my statements any way you
wish to. I "pity the fools" who can read simple posts.


Twisting what you have said, putting words into your mouth and ascribing
false claims to general, subjective remarks (opinions, usually) you have
made are the well-known SOP of these *rabid* vinyl-bashers. Their
'scientific arguments' fly out off the window when it comes to the
simple task of listening to the *music* - here's a little test I would
like to see carried out (but CBA to do myself):

Select a number of 'innocent parties' - people who like music but have
no interest in *audio*.

Ask their preference in music or get them to choose or bring a CD.

Sit them in a room (one at a time) with a CD setup, the CD of their
choice, some refreshments and a remote control, tell them they've got
all the time they want and shut the door on them.

Secretly observe them.

Report how many of them listened to the whole disk without skipping/fast
fowarding tracks....

Then, for bonus points, play them the CD and SACD tracks (blind) of the
same music and ask which they thought *better*....

(I make no predictions, but I have my own suspicions... ;-)

"Jenn" wrote in message

et...
You've missed the point yet again. My point is that I've distorted
NOTHING. You and Mr. T can keep distorting my statements any way you
wish to. I "pity the fools" who can read simple posts.

Yep, your posts are so simple they are content free it seems. ANY
interpretation is strongly denied!

MrT.

In article ,
"Mr.T" MrT@home wrote:

"Jenn" wrote in message

et...
You've missed the point yet again. My point is that I've distorted
NOTHING. You and Mr. T can keep distorting my statements any way you
wish to. I "pity the fools" who can't (corrected) read simple posts.

Yep, your posts are so simple they are content free it seems. ANY
interpretation is strongly denied!

Tell me Mr. T: What have I "distorted"?

"Jenn" wrote in message

et...
Tell me Mr. T: What have I "distorted"?

Nothing at all, since that's all you've said, once all your denials are
taken into account.

MrT.

In article ,
"Mr.T" MrT@home wrote:

"Jenn" wrote in message

et...
Tell me Mr. T: What have I "distorted"?

Nothing at all, since that's all you've said, once all your denials are
taken into account.

MrT.

What denials, Mr. T? Do you believe that I've been less than truthful?
If so, show some honor and point out where I've done so.

"Jenn" wrote in message

om...
What denials, Mr. T? Do you believe that I've been less than truthful?
If so, show some honor and point out where I've done so.

No idea, I did ask you to clarify one statement, but you failed to do so.
I'll accept your denials, so that leaves nothing else to discuss.

MrT.

In article ,
"Mr.T" MrT@home wrote:

"Jenn" wrote in message

om...
What denials, Mr. T? Do you believe that I've been less than truthful?
If so, show some honor and point out where I've done so.

No idea, I did ask you to clarify one statement, but you failed to do so.
I'll accept your denials, so that leaves nothing else to discuss.

MrT.

What statement, Mr. T?