"Keith G" wrote in message
...
"Dave Plowman (News)" wrote in message
...
In article ,
Keith G wrote:
Personally, I think there's a perfect parallel between HD bikes and
expensive, glitzy valve amps - some people prefer 'old technology'
done
well and with style to modern technology done bland....
Hmm. As you've probably gathered I like old cars too. And bikes,
although
I don't own one. But don't fool myself that the performance is in any
way
comparable to modern ones.
Depends on your performance requirements, doesn't it?
Modern, 'plastic fantastic' *anything* doesn't really do it for a lot
of people and many others (me included) are perfectly capable of
mixing the 'old and the new' to best effect, according to the
particular requirements in a given situation....
Actually, as I'm still stuck waiting for deliveries (and it's ****ing
with rain anyway), I'll overcome my *reluctance to blog* and expand on
that a tad....
Having just binned my Jap 'Superbike' at very low speed (my own fault
for *pushing* too hard and being to close, but not caused by me - that
was thanks to some arse in an artic cutting across the roundabout), I am
seriously less than impressed at the damage that has been sustained by
the bike. It's like it went down like a sack of **** (as did I) and got
banged up in areas that frankly astound me - there are bits that touched
down that should never have made contact with the road! (Trust me, I
have some experience of this!!) There are some pix on my Show N Tell
page, if anyone is interested:
http://www.apah69.dsl.pipex.com/show/show.htm
The bike obviously suffered from its own weight and it's got me
thinking - how TF can you pop a fork seal at sod-all mph, for instance??
So...
Yesterday afternoon I toddled over to see Tone the Clone with a view to
possibly *downsizing* and putting my biking into a new perspective. I
had a little sit on this one:
http://www.stneotsmotorcycles.com/in...details&id=315
:-)
Laugh all yew like, but when you sit on one these you *want* one! (I
suspect some of the fittings on this bike are directly interchangeable
with those on a Boeing 707!) But they really are magnificent and if I
lived in Arizona (?) I'd have one, but hardly downsizing so I then had a
little pootle on this one:
http://www.stneotsmotorcycles.com/in...details&id=303
.....as it *appears* to represent the best of both the old and new
worlds - being a modern take on a traditional theme and *should* be an
ideal.
Phuq mi - what a shock! Compared to my Soozie, the Triumph was really a
nasty little bit of kit! At a quick glance it looked a lot more like an
'Indian Enfield' than any real 'Bonnie' I ever saw! For a clue, compare
this pic:
http://www.triumph.co.uk/uk/785.aspx
- with, say, this one:
http://www.olsenart.com/bonneville.html
No comparison! (But, I suppose, not ruled out yet - depends how I feel
when my own bike is back here...)
Anyways, be it bikes, watches, cameras, mics, audio kit, cars, clothes,
shoes, tools and a whole lot of other things, to say that *new beats
old* simply because it's (supposedly) more reliable and better specced
(on paper) is to miss the point on *much* in life which is about stuff
like true quality, satisfaction and a deep pride of ownership. It may
well be different in the pro world where reliability is perhaps an
overriding concern, but as a *hobbyist*, I like to *enjoy* my kit and
mix and match as required with no qualms about blending new/old,
digital/analogue, valve/SS...!!??
OK, rant over...
Now, as a reward for struggling through all that, here's an opportunity
for someone to make themselves look smart: What is the queer little blue
thing labelled '100HX-6bB' [sic] with what looks to be a blue 'pull out
bit' slap in the middle of this board from one of my mics:
http://www.apah69.dsl.pipex.com/show/QueerThing.JPG
???
(Doesn't say 'not a resistor' or 'not a capacitor' so I'm stuffed!! :-)