Audio, hi-fi and car audio - Who Sent the Recent Flood of Abusive Messages re Peter Wieck?

John Byrns wrote:

In article . com,
Andre Jute wrote:

-- As we saw when Wieck arrived on RAT fully armed with the Timmie
material that Pasternack's criminal associates stole from my computer

Hi Andre,

I know you have been complaining for ten years or so about the gang
taking your "Timmie material" as their own, but I never stopped to think
about it in detail before. I had previously casually assumed that you
had put the Timmie story on your old web site, or perhaps even posted it
to the rec.audio.tubes newsgroup, and the gang had taken it from there
and used it as if it was their own property. I didn't pay particular
attention to the "stole from my computer" phrase you always use, and
what its significance might be? Pasternak's recent use of the Timmie
story changed all that and got me wondering exactly what you mean by the
phrase "stole from my computer", are you saying Pasternack and the gang
didn't take the Timmie story from your web site, or from a newsgroup,
but that they literally hacked into your personal computer via the
internet and took the story directly from there? Inquiring minds want
to know.

Regards,

John Byrns

Indeed, John, criminal associates of Pasternack hacked into my
computer and stole my property, part of the "Timmie" manuscript, from
it. It was done by Frank Deutschmann and Robert C Chernofsky, who then
published the material on the Joenet to spite me because I cannot sell
material that is already published. In this, as usual, the Magnequest
Scum shot itself in the foot; I had already decided that the book
would do untold harm as a manual for stalkers (of the wannabe-artist
type like Worthless Wiecky and Pasternack) and by mutual agreement had
withdrawn the manuscript and given the publisher his money back. That
was when the Magnequest Scum started altering bits of the manuscript
to suit their own purposes and demanding that I defend the
"claim" (which of course I had never made); twelve years later
Pasternack is still at it.

There are thus three crimes: the theft of my property from my
computer, the publication of my copyright material without my
permission, and the alteration of my copyright material without my
permission. Henry Pasternack has made himself complicit in the
original crime of the data theft by repeatedly publishing the stolen
material. Henry Pasternack is directly guilty of publishing my
copyright materials repeatedly after he was told as early as 1998 that
they are my copyright materials and he has no right to publish. Henry
Pasternack has altered my copyright materials after he was publicly
told he had no right to alter them. All these are thefts of the bread
from my table.

Henry Pasternack's excuse for these thefts, committed in public, is
ludicrously that he and the other criminals in his gang have stolen my
property so often, it now belongs to them. (This is logic, from a man
who brags of a Stanford education? Stanford trustees and fundraisers
must cringe every time they see the name of Henry Pasternack.)

Henry Pasternack is a thief many, many times over. QED.

Henry Pasternack is also slime, but we all know that already.

Henry Pasternack is a stalker: he is so consumed by envy and hatred, I
doubt Pasternack could give you a coherent explanation of why he is
still doing all this -- the public stealing and everything else --
after ten years of being flicked off my thumb like a piece of snot
(1). There's some discussion here of whether we should devise a test
to discover if Pasternack is a sadomasochist or merely too stupid to
connect action to consequence (somewhat similar to the two tests I
devised to prove that Krueger hates omnidirectionally). I'm making
book on it already if you want to bet.

Andre Jute
Zero tolerance for the enemies of society

(1) Not to mention Pasternack being repeatedly exposed by you for his
professional lies! I think Pasternack is punchdrunk. Do his activities
on RAT and related conferences recently bear out his own description
of A Man Who Found Peace in the Keyboard? Hell, no, Pasternack is
dancing around like a dervish with a turpentine stick up his arse, in
his frustration beating up his meatpuppets like Worthless Wiecky
because he cannot get at me. Soon Pasternack will start on you again,
trying to prove that he was right in some thrice-lost argument eight
or ten years ago...