A Audio, hi-fi and car audio  forum. Audio Banter

Go Back   Home » Audio Banter forum » UK Audio Newsgroups » uk.rec.audio (General Audio and Hi-Fi)
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

uk.rec.audio (General Audio and Hi-Fi) (uk.rec.audio) Discussion and exchange of hi-fi audio equipment.

Record demagnetizers



 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #51 (permalink)  
Old November 14th 07, 03:43 PM posted to uk.rec.audio
Serge Auckland
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 509
Default Record demagnetizers

"Jim Lesurf" wrote in message
...
In article , Bob Latham
wrote:
In article , Rob
wrote:


I can't explain I'm afraid - but a NAD tec advised retain the ground
at the source, and open at the other end.


Hmmm. I've learnt from reading forums like this, that this is the
considered the way to do it ie. connect screen at source and disconnect
at destination.


I think Jim once tried to convince me there was a good reason for that


Afraid I can't recall what I may have said. However...

It can make sense *if* you have a loop which is causing hum. *However* it
would be preferrable if that could be fixed in some other way. The
difficulty is that hum generation can me more complex than the simple
descriptions, and sometimes some actions are impractical, so you end up
with a less-than-ideal solution.

A better way - if possible - is to lift the grounds from the mains
connections of all units *except one*. And then make sure all screens are
connected at both ends and used for ground path return.


A practice I find dangerous, in that if the audio connections are removed,
then a piece of equipment can be left powered-up but ungrounded, with
obvious danger in case of an electrical fault. I much prefer the practice of
having seperate audio and safety grounds, grounding every safety ground and
joining the audio ground to safety ground at one point only in an
installation. This is pretty much standard practice for Broadcast equipment,
sadly not yet for consumer stuff. With increasing numbers of "high-end"
equipments offering balanced connections, it would be fairly easy to offer
seperate audio and safety grounds.

rest snipped


S.

--
http://audiopages.googlepages.com


  #52 (permalink)  
Old November 14th 07, 04:42 PM posted to uk.rec.audio
Dave Plowman (News)
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 5,872
Default Record demagnetizers

In article ,
Serge Auckland wrote:
A better way - if possible - is to lift the grounds from the mains
connections of all units *except one*. And then make sure all screens
are connected at both ends and used for ground path return.


A practice I find dangerous, in that if the audio connections are
removed, then a piece of equipment can be left powered-up but
ungrounded, with obvious danger in case of an electrical fault.


Pretty well all domestic Hi-Fi has Class II insulation. So even if metal
cased doesn't need a safety earth. Indicated (in the UK) by only having a
two wire power cable.

I much prefer the practice of having seperate audio and safety grounds,
grounding every safety ground and joining the audio ground to safety
ground at one point only in an installation. This is pretty much
standard practice for Broadcast equipment, sadly not yet for consumer
stuff. With increasing numbers of "high-end" equipments offering
balanced connections, it would be fairly easy to offer seperate audio
and safety grounds.


While balancing is ideal for the long runs and hostile environment pro
gear oft finds itself in I'm not sure about the validity for domestic use.
Much domestic gear is internally unbalanced so providing a balanced output
might mean adding unnecessary extra electronics.

--
*What was the best thing before sliced bread?

Dave Plowman London SW
To e-mail, change noise into sound.
  #53 (permalink)  
Old November 14th 07, 05:04 PM posted to uk.rec.audio
Serge Auckland
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 509
Default Record demagnetizers

"Dave Plowman (News)" wrote in message
...
In article ,
Serge Auckland wrote:
A better way - if possible - is to lift the grounds from the mains
connections of all units *except one*. And then make sure all screens
are connected at both ends and used for ground path return.


A practice I find dangerous, in that if the audio connections are
removed, then a piece of equipment can be left powered-up but
ungrounded, with obvious danger in case of an electrical fault.


Pretty well all domestic Hi-Fi has Class II insulation. So even if metal
cased doesn't need a safety earth. Indicated (in the UK) by only having a
two wire power cable.


I know, but I have an inherent distrust of ClassII insulation. Much prefer
bonding everything to earth! I really hate the odd tingly feeling when
lightly touching some double-insulated products.


I much prefer the practice of having seperate audio and safety grounds,
grounding every safety ground and joining the audio ground to safety
ground at one point only in an installation. This is pretty much
standard practice for Broadcast equipment, sadly not yet for consumer
stuff. With increasing numbers of "high-end" equipments offering
balanced connections, it would be fairly easy to offer seperate audio
and safety grounds.


While balancing is ideal for the long runs and hostile environment pro
gear oft finds itself in I'm not sure about the validity for domestic use.
Much domestic gear is internally unbalanced so providing a balanced output
might mean adding unnecessary extra electronics.

--
*What was the best thing before sliced bread?

Dave Plowman London SW
To e-mail, change noise into sound.


Short cable runs especially at line levels really don't need balancing, and
it's something of a mystery to me why some high-end consumer products like
CD players are offering balanced outputs whilst phono inputs are almost
invariably unbalanced, which is the one area of home hi-fi that would
benefit from balanced inputs. Could it be anything to do with
fashion.......?

S.



--
http://audiopages.googlepages.com


  #54 (permalink)  
Old November 14th 07, 05:08 PM posted to uk.rec.audio
Arny Krueger
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 3,850
Default Record demagnetizers

"Serge Auckland" wrote in
message news
Short cable runs especially at line levels really don't
need balancing,


Really? You ought to try to measure the dynamic range of a CD player using
a completely unbalanced connection. Sometimes it works, but often the best
possible results are only obtained by using a balanced input cable on the
test equipment.

and it's something of a mystery to me why
some high-end consumer products like CD players are
offering balanced outputs


Its very often a cheap easy way to ensure the best possible dynamic range.

whilst phono inputs are almost invariably unbalanced,


The saving grace here is that the source(phono cartrdige) is usually
floating by virtue of being ungrounded, except at the input of the phono
preamp.



  #55 (permalink)  
Old November 14th 07, 05:26 PM posted to uk.rec.audio
Serge Auckland
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 509
Default Record demagnetizers

"Arny Krueger" wrote in message
news
"Serge Auckland" wrote in
message news
Short cable runs especially at line levels really don't
need balancing,


Really? You ought to try to measure the dynamic range of a CD player
using a completely unbalanced connection. Sometimes it works, but often
the best possible results are only obtained by using a balanced input
cable on the test equipment.


Why should a balanced input cable make a difference to dynamic range on an
unbalanced output? Or, are you saying that a balanced output will have lower
noise? If so, that shows either poor design on the CD player or inadequately
screened cables. In normal domestic environments, I don't see any benefit
from using balanced connections if cable lengths are less than 10 metres.


and it's something of a mystery to me why
some high-end consumer products like CD players are
offering balanced outputs


Its very often a cheap easy way to ensure the best possible dynamic range.


But only if the receiving equipment (pre-amp or whatever) has balanced
inputs. Otherwise, it's just a consequence of a higher signal level, not of
balancing.

whilst phono inputs are almost invariably unbalanced,


The saving grace here is that the source(phono cartrdige) is usually
floating by virtue of being ungrounded, except at the input of the phono
preamp.

And hence unbalanced. PU cartridge inputs, especially MC inputs should be
balanced. The cartridge is, and so should the phono pre-amp, but very rarely
is.

S.


--
http://audiopages.googlepages.com


  #56 (permalink)  
Old November 14th 07, 06:13 PM posted to uk.rec.audio
David Looser
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,883
Default Record demagnetizers

"Serge Auckland" wrote in message
...
"Arny Krueger" wrote in message
news
"Serge Auckland" wrote in
message news
Short cable runs especially at line levels really don't
need balancing,


Really? You ought to try to measure the dynamic range of a CD player
using a completely unbalanced connection. Sometimes it works, but often
the best possible results are only obtained by using a balanced input
cable on the test equipment.


Why should a balanced input cable make a difference to dynamic range on an
unbalanced output? Or, are you saying that a balanced output will have
lower noise? If so, that shows either poor design on the CD player or
inadequately screened cables. In normal domestic environments, I don't
see any benefit from using balanced connections if cable lengths are less
than 10 metres.

The main advantage as I see it is exactly what has been discussed in this
thread, i.e.. elimination of ground loops. Unless both the source and
destination are balanced, then we are really talking about floating outputs
and differential inputs. An amplifier with a differential input can make a
good job of eliminating common-mode hum etc. even when driven by a typical
unbalanced domestic source.

David.


  #57 (permalink)  
Old November 14th 07, 06:25 PM posted to uk.rec.audio
Serge Auckland
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 509
Default Record demagnetizers

"David Looser" wrote in message
...
"Serge Auckland" wrote in message
...
"Arny Krueger" wrote in message
news
"Serge Auckland" wrote in
message news
Short cable runs especially at line levels really don't
need balancing,

Really? You ought to try to measure the dynamic range of a CD player
using a completely unbalanced connection. Sometimes it works, but often
the best possible results are only obtained by using a balanced input
cable on the test equipment.


Why should a balanced input cable make a difference to dynamic range on
an unbalanced output? Or, are you saying that a balanced output will have
lower noise? If so, that shows either poor design on the CD player or
inadequately screened cables. In normal domestic environments, I don't
see any benefit from using balanced connections if cable lengths are less
than 10 metres.

The main advantage as I see it is exactly what has been discussed in this
thread, i.e.. elimination of ground loops. Unless both the source and
destination are balanced, then we are really talking about floating
outputs and differential inputs. An amplifier with a differential input
can make a good job of eliminating common-mode hum etc. even when driven
by a typical unbalanced domestic source.

David.


Yes, but if equipment, even unbalanced had separate mains and signal earths,
then ground loops wouldn't be a problem.

S.



--
http://audiopages.googlepages.com


  #58 (permalink)  
Old November 14th 07, 11:34 PM posted to uk.rec.audio
Dave Plowman (News)
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 5,872
Default Record demagnetizers

In article , Arny Krueger
wrote:
Short cable runs especially at line levels really don't need balancing,


Really? You ought to try to measure the dynamic range of a CD player
using a completely unbalanced connection. Sometimes it works, but often
the best possible results are only obtained by using a balanced input
cable on the test equipment.


You'll need to run that by me again. I really can't see how the type of
connection can have any influence on dynamic range - it's just a bit of
wire. Unless you mean your test equipment isn't designed for unbalanced
operation - or you're in such a hostile environment it's picking up
interference.

--
*Some days we are the flies; some days we are the windscreen.*

Dave Plowman London SW
To e-mail, change noise into sound.
  #59 (permalink)  
Old November 15th 07, 08:23 AM posted to uk.rec.audio
Jim Lesurf
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 3,051
Default Record demagnetizers

In article , Dave Plowman (News)
wrote:
In article , Serge Auckland
wrote:
A better way - if possible - is to lift the grounds from the mains
connections of all units *except one*. And then make sure all
screens are connected at both ends and used for ground path return.


A practice I find dangerous, in that if the audio connections are
removed, then a piece of equipment can be left powered-up but
ungrounded, with obvious danger in case of an electrical fault.


Pretty well all domestic Hi-Fi has Class II insulation. So even if metal
cased doesn't need a safety earth. Indicated (in the UK) by only having
a two wire power cable.


Indeed. In practice most items like signal 'sources' these days seem to
have two-wire mains leads with class 2 insulation. So the user has this
decision made for them.

I'd agree that grounding each unit is desirable for safety reasons *where
the units are in metal boxes or have external metal parts.*. But in
practice you may find that some units which have a ground line to mains
cause hum in some arrangements, and so a ground lift may be needed as the
only alternative is to replace the unit, or some other item in the system.

This isn't a practice I've ever found to actually be dangerous in use. But
you need to apply it with care, and remember what you have done. In some
cases I have deliberately used the red-coloured two-wire mains cable (sold
for garden use) when doing this as a continual visual prompt that a given
unit has no mains ground link of its own.

Actually, the closest case to this being dangerous I've encountered was
when we used to have to float almost all the gear on a telescope at Mauna
Kea (Hawai'i) to get rid of loops. The result being that the entire
telescope tended to drift up in potential over time, and would give you a
belt if touched after 10-20 mins. Not something I've encountered with
decent domestic audio. But I would be very cautious of some older TV sets.

I much prefer the practice of having seperate audio and safety
grounds, grounding every safety ground and joining the audio ground to
safety ground at one point only in an installation.


So do I. The snag is that in some cases it leads to hum, and become
unusuable as an arrangement. You then either have to give up or make some
change which is less than ideal. Alas, our world is not ideal.

This is pretty much standard practice for Broadcast equipment, sadly
not yet for consumer stuff. With increasing numbers of "high-end"
equipments offering balanced connections, it would be fairly easy to
offer seperate audio and safety grounds.


Yes. However simply having balanced interconnections isn't in itself a
guarantee that you won't sometime need to lift a ground line, or make some
change to reduce hum.

While balancing is ideal for the long runs and hostile environment pro
gear oft finds itself in I'm not sure about the validity for domestic
use. Much domestic gear is internally unbalanced so providing a balanced
output might mean adding unnecessary extra electronics.


Plus which it might not actually mean that you never find that lifting a
ground on some unit doesn't help. :-)

The roots of the problem here are partly in the ways in which domestic
equipment are designed/made. Partly in domestic mains power arrangements.
In practice, the use of class 2 and twin-cable mains avoids many problems,
at the expense of the maker having to ensure class 2 compliance.

Slainte,

Jim

--
Electronics http://www.st-and.ac.uk/~www_pa/Scot...o/electron.htm
Audio Misc http://www.audiomisc.co.uk/index.html
Armstrong Audio http://www.audiomisc.co.uk/Armstrong/armstrong.html
  #60 (permalink)  
Old November 15th 07, 08:27 AM posted to uk.rec.audio
Jim Lesurf
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 3,051
Default Record demagnetizers

In article , Serge Auckland
wrote:
"Dave Plowman (News)" wrote in message
...
In article , Serge Auckland
wrote:
A better way - if possible - is to lift the grounds from the mains
connections of all units *except one*. And then make sure all
screens are connected at both ends and used for ground path return.


A practice I find dangerous, in that if the audio connections are
removed, then a piece of equipment can be left powered-up but
ungrounded, with obvious danger in case of an electrical fault.


Pretty well all domestic Hi-Fi has Class II insulation. So even if
metal cased doesn't need a safety earth. Indicated (in the UK) by only
having a two wire power cable.


I know, but I have an inherent distrust of ClassII insulation. Much
prefer bonding everything to earth! I really hate the odd tingly
feeling when lightly touching some double-insulated products.


You can just as easily argue that - if external parts are metal - then
having a ground line which may become unconnected is more of a risk.

The 'tingle' may well be due to an RF filter arrangement or poor screening
in the PSU. if so, it is a sign of poor design, perhaps. But need not
signify a safety risk.

Short cable runs especially at line levels really don't need balancing,
and it's something of a mystery to me why some high-end consumer
products like CD players are offering balanced outputs whilst phono
inputs are almost invariably unbalanced, which is the one area of home
hi-fi that would benefit from balanced inputs. Could it be anything to
do with fashion.......?


....or even "louder is better" as they also tend to deliver higher levels...
:-)

Slainte,

Jim

--
Electronics http://www.st-and.ac.uk/~www_pa/Scot...o/electron.htm
Audio Misc http://www.audiomisc.co.uk/index.html
Armstrong Audio http://www.audiomisc.co.uk/Armstrong/armstrong.html
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT. The time now is 02:08 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.SEO by vBSEO 3.0.0
Copyright ©2004-2025 Audio Banter.
The comments are property of their posters.