A Audio, hi-fi and car audio  forum. Audio Banter

Go Back   Home » Audio Banter forum » UK Audio Newsgroups » uk.rec.audio (General Audio and Hi-Fi)
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

uk.rec.audio (General Audio and Hi-Fi) (uk.rec.audio) Discussion and exchange of hi-fi audio equipment.

Improving loudspeaker crossovers (SBL's)



 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #11 (permalink)  
Old January 6th 08, 10:27 PM posted to uk.rec.audio
Keith G
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 7,388
Default Improving loudspeaker crossovers (SBL's)


"David Looser" wrote in message
...
Keith G" wrote



Whatever. One thing the accurists have to fall back on is the
'mastertape'
and the gauged faithfulness to this (fidelity) was frequently thrown into
the arguments as the be-all and end-all of sound reproduction. The reason
for this is that it is fairly easy to *measure* deviation from the
original signal, rules can be made from various measurements and it
therefore becomes a useful weapon.


Well no. The reason is that the mastertape represents the sound that the
sound engineer, record producer, artist etc. agreed was what they wanted
the
record to sound like.



Irrelevant - whatever the mastertape is (or isn't) is not the issue; the
'accuracy vs. realism' argument is....



Where it becomes horse**** in my book is when reference is
continually made to mastertapes that no-one has ever heard (or ever will)


No-one? what about the recording engineer, the producer, the artist etc?



More irrelevancy - they weren't present in the arguments in this group,
AFAIA....



Long rambling story snipped.



Nothing like as long as your 'cinema irrelevancies' which I snipped...



The upshot is my Bezzer is now 8 miles from here, while he checks to see
how well it drives his Altec Lansing behemoth speakers (???) - yet
another
'realism beats accuracy' triumph, I believe,


How do you work that out?, what did your story have to do with either
accuracy or realism?



Because the guy leapt at a 300B SET (over his own SS pre and PP valve monos)
which, as I'm sure you are aware, are slated endlessly in this group for
'distortion' ('broken' even...) but which I maintain provide a more
*realistic* sound - kinda proves my point, doesn't it? Asitappens, he's been
on the phone since to say (verbatim) 'I'm not getting the same, sweet sound
as you get on your Lowthers!' - I'm not surprised, I didn't think he would
but I was willing to let him try!

While I'm on: I have started a ferocious campaign to reduce clutter and am
punting no end of stuff out on eBay - I have 5 auctions on now, including a
set of both Morgan Jones 'Valve Amp' books which may be of interest to
someone he

http://cgi.ebay.co.uk/ws/eBayISAPI.d...MESE:IT&ih=017


Condition *as new*....

(Sorry to say! :-)


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT. The time now is 10:23 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.SEO by vBSEO 3.0.0
Copyright ©2004-2025 Audio Banter.
The comments are property of their posters.