
August 14th 08, 11:23 AM
posted to uk.rec.audio
|
|
Sound recording software for old PC?
Hello
I've got an old PC with Windows 95 that I would like to use for
converting a load of old cassettes to MP3 format, and I need some
sound recording software. It doesn't need to do anything clever at
all - just start recording and then stop, saving a wav file. Can
anyone recommend anything please?
I know people always seem to recommend Audacity, but that is only for
Windows 98 or later.
Many thanks
Paul
|

August 14th 08, 12:09 PM
posted to uk.rec.audio
|
|
Sound recording software for old PC?
|

August 14th 08, 12:22 PM
posted to uk.rec.audio
|
|
Sound recording software for old PC?
|

August 14th 08, 05:26 PM
posted to uk.rec.audio
|
|
Sound recording software for old PC?
|

August 14th 08, 06:32 PM
posted to uk.rec.audio
|
|
Sound recording software for old PC?
In article ,
Eeyore wrote:
wrote:
Hello
I've got an old PC with Windows 95 that I would like to use for
converting a load of old cassettes to MP3 format, and I need some
sound recording software. It doesn't need to do anything clever at
all - just start recording and then stop, saving a wav file. Can
anyone recommend anything please?
I know people always seem to recommend Audacity, but that is only for
Windows 98 or later.
Just a suggestion. Can't you get a copy of W98 Pref SP2. It's SO much
nicer.
Absolutely. It runs on the 586 PC card in my workshop Acorn machine so
should run on anything.
--
*Virtual reality is its own reward *
Dave Plowman London SW
To e-mail, change noise into sound.
|

August 17th 08, 10:21 AM
posted to uk.rec.audio
|
|
Sound recording software for old PC?
Thanks to everyone who replied. My findings are given below, in case
anyone asks this question in future.
My old PC is a Pentium 100, with 64M ram. Windows 98 will work on it,
but it would be more accurate to say it walks than runs, so I prefer
to stick with Windows 95. I can confirm that Audacity will not work
on Windows 95, even though the hardware is just about good enough for
Windows 98.
I was very interested to try Audiograbber, as I already have an old
copy of Audiocatalyst installed for converting CDs to MP3.
Audiocatalyst combines Audiograbber with the Xing MP3 encoder and is
very fast and easy to use - although sadly my version does not allow
recording from the analogue inputs. I tried Audiograbber with the
Lame encoder and it worked fine - except that the Xing encoder with
Audiocatalyst is 4 times faster.
I was impressed with CDex (especially the on-the-fly MP3 encoding,
except that my PC isn't fast enough) although I could not find any
form of level meters - a major failing in my view.
In the end I found a compact program called ALL2WAV which does
everything I want, although I did have to install a dll file to get it
working with Windows 95.
Once again, thanks to everyone who replied.
Paul
On 14 Aug, 19:32, "Dave Plowman (News)" wrote:
In article ,
* *Eeyore wrote:
wrote:
Hello
I've got an old PC with Windows 95 that I would like to use for
converting a load of old cassettes to MP3 format, and I need some
sound recording software. *It doesn't need to do anything clever at
all - just start recording and then stop, saving a wav file. *Can
anyone recommend anything please?
I know people always seem to recommend Audacity, but that is only for
Windows 98 or later.
Just a suggestion. Can't you get a copy of W98 Pref SP2. It's SO much
nicer.
Absolutely. It runs on the 586 PC card in my workshop Acorn machine so
should run on anything.
--
*Virtual reality is its own reward *
* * Dave Plowman * * * * * * * * London SW
* * * * * * * * * To e-mail, change noise into sound.
|

August 17th 08, 05:45 PM
posted to uk.rec.audio
|
|
Sound recording software for old PC?
wrote in message
...
Thanks to everyone who replied. My findings are given below, in case
anyone asks this question in future.
My old PC is a Pentium 100, with 64M ram. Windows 98 will work on it,
but it would be more accurate to say it walks than runs, so I prefer
to stick with Windows 95. I can confirm that Audacity will not work
on Windows 95, even though the hardware is just about good enough for
Windows 98.
I was very interested to try Audiograbber, as I already have an old
copy of Audiocatalyst installed for converting CDs to MP3.
Audiocatalyst combines Audiograbber with the Xing MP3 encoder and is
very fast and easy to use - although sadly my version does not allow
recording from the analogue inputs. I tried Audiograbber with the
Lame encoder and it worked fine - except that the Xing encoder with
Audiocatalyst is 4 times faster.
I was impressed with CDex (especially the on-the-fly MP3 encoding,
except that my PC isn't fast enough) although I could not find any
form of level meters - a major failing in my view.
In the end I found a compact program called ALL2WAV which does
everything I want, although I did have to install a dll file to get it
working with Windows 95.
Once again, thanks to everyone who replied.
Paul
64Mb is really too small for W95 and certainly for 98. You should still
be able to get hold of the right type of RAM - usually known as PC100
but PC133 will work perfectly well. 256Mb is more like what you will
need, then you should find W98SE will run quite well, albeit rather
slowly.
You may need to go to a computer fair to get the right type of RAM, but
it is still readily available.
--
Woody
harrogate three at ntlworld dot com
|

August 18th 08, 06:00 AM
posted to uk.rec.audio
|
|
Sound recording software for old PC?
Signal wrote:
"Woody" wrote:
Thanks to everyone who replied. My findings are given below, in case
anyone asks this question in future.
My old PC is a Pentium 100, with 64M ram. Windows 98 will work on it,
but it would be more accurate to say it walks than runs, so I prefer
to stick with Windows 95. I can confirm that Audacity will not work
on Windows 95, even though the hardware is just about good enough for
Windows 98.
I was very interested to try Audiograbber, as I already have an old
copy of Audiocatalyst installed for converting CDs to MP3.
Audiocatalyst combines Audiograbber with the Xing MP3 encoder and is
very fast and easy to use - although sadly my version does not allow
recording from the analogue inputs. I tried Audiograbber with the
Lame encoder and it worked fine - except that the Xing encoder with
Audiocatalyst is 4 times faster.
I was impressed with CDex (especially the on-the-fly MP3 encoding,
except that my PC isn't fast enough) although I could not find any
form of level meters - a major failing in my view.
In the end I found a compact program called ALL2WAV which does
everything I want, although I did have to install a dll file to get it
working with Windows 95.
Once again, thanks to everyone who replied.
Paul
64Mb is really too small for W95 and certainly for 98. You should still
be able to get hold of the right type of RAM - usually known as PC100
but PC133 will work perfectly well. 256Mb is more like what you will
need, then you should find W98SE will run quite well, albeit rather
slowly.
You may need to go to a computer fair to get the right type of RAM, but
it is still readily available.
You might be able to pick up some of that ram, with a better spec'd
computer attached to it on freecycle. 
Indeed - I recently Freecycled a load of computer bits including
processors, a motherboard and a few gig of RAM. Don't mean to rub it in
- just to say it happens!
Rob
|
Thread Tools |
|
Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
|