In article , Dave Plowman (News)
wrote:
In article , Jim Lesurf
wrote:
Unless the unit has been badly mistreated I also have doubts that the
pot is to blame as they are quite high quality stepped attenuators.
More likely a poor connection or dud cap elsewhere.
Is it a stepped attenuator or just a normal pot with mechanical indents?
I suspect the latter.
IIRC the 40mm series of this type is a stepped attenuator. Metal landings
with resistive elements between them, and the wiper moves across them. This
was how Alps were able to sell versions laser trimmed to a given balance
and attenuation spec. Hence why they were also very costly even in
low-commercial-production quantities... and why they vanished from the UK
as an single item purchase. Cost too much to make import/sale worth the
effort when most people would buy something cheaper.
The volume controls I chose for the ancient Armstrong 700 was a stepped
attenuator from Alps of the kind I have in mind. With a laser trim to quite
close tolerances. Cost a fortune at the time! But I felt it was worth it
just to have the balance stay put as you wound the volume up and down over
the range. Has also proved its worth since when I do measurements as I can
accurately adjust and reset levels.
They also did a 4-gang version at one time so you could control i/p and o/p
level together! This turned up on a few amps from people like Pioneer, etc,
IIRC, but was very expensive even without special trimming, so only on
'flagship' designs.
Above said, for all I know they changed the design later on after learning
how to get the same accuracy from a continuous track!
The smaller Alps pots are a continuous track with a detent collar to mimic
the behaviour, but not the precision of the results. Much cheaper to make,
and so lower cost. Hence turned up on far more kit, and other mass
production makers did similar, cheap, pretend attenuators using a collar.
Alps probably would also do 40mm continuous with collar if wanted, so
the 34 control *may* be that, but I think it is a discrete attenuator. If
all that was wanted was a stepped action then the smaller pots with collar
will give that at lower cost. The 40mm size costs cash, but gives space for
the landings and elements, etc.
However I've not cut open one of the controls from an old 34, so I may be
being over-generous to PJW, Mike Albinson, etc. But I suspect not. :-)
That said, if the faulty 34 that started this thread was sent to me, and
I found that the control *was* to blame I could cut it open and report
what I found. But I'm not going to buy one from Quad just for that! ;-
Slainte,
Jim
--
Change 'noise' to 'jcgl' if you wish to email me.
Electronics
http://www.st-and.ac.uk/~www_pa/Scot...o/electron.htm
Armstrong Audio
http://www.audiomisc.co.uk/Armstrong/armstrong.html
Audio Misc
http://www.audiomisc.co.uk/index.html