A Audio, hi-fi and car audio  forum. Audio Banter

Go Back   Home » Audio Banter forum » UK Audio Newsgroups » uk.rec.audio (General Audio and Hi-Fi)
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

uk.rec.audio (General Audio and Hi-Fi) (uk.rec.audio) Discussion and exchange of hi-fi audio equipment.

Bassreflex design: port diameter is larger than speaker, will it work?



 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #31 (permalink)  
Old September 23rd 08, 09:34 AM posted to uk.rec.audio
Trevor Wilson[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 166
Default Bassreflex design: port diameter is larger than speaker, will it work?




"Arny Krueger" wrote in message
. ..
"Trevor Wilson" wrote
in message
"Arny Krueger" wrote in message
...
"Trevor Wilson"
wrote in message

**Nonsense. The lowest useful frequency from a bass
guitar is higher than 80Hz. Almost no fundamental is
audible. It's all second harmonic.

Written by someone who has obviously never actually
analyzed the signal that comes out of a pickup from a
bass guitar.


**Wrong, but I have certainly not examined all of them.
In fact, I've only examined 3 or 4. All were 4 string
bass.


The fundamentals can be there if you don't lose them
along the way.


**Sure. The fundamental is at such a low level, that few
ever hear much of it.


I just pulled up the bass track from a multitrack recording that I made at
church. The most intense harmonic was second, followed by fourth, third,
and fundamental. The fundamental was only 8 dB below the most intense
harmonic, the second.


**Which is not too far from my own measurements.


I do suspect that few bass guitar amps are actually
competent reproducers of the region 32 Hz, which is
approximately the fundamental of the lowest note
playable on a 5-string bass guitar.


**The AMP may well be a competent reproducer of the
lowest frequencies, but the speakers rarely are.


Agreed in that I was speaking of "guitar amp", the common nomenclature for
an assembly that includes the speaker.

FWIW, most players filter out the lowest frequencies anyway.


Not the case with the players I record. We boost the bass end of this
channel pretty hard, with a pretty steep roll-off. I don't have the
mixer at hand, so I don't know the exact frequencies, Qs, and boost. If
memory serves, there's a 10 dB peak in the 40 Hz range, Q on the order
2, plus other filters. Everthing above 2 Khz is filtered out very heavily,
but there's a big, more gentle roll-off starting around 150 Hz.

They tend to prefer a 'faster' more 'articulate' bass.
This means that frequencies as high 1kHz are often
boosted.


That gives you a sort of slappy, twangy sound. Different horses for
different courses.


**Of course.


--
Trevor Wilson
www.rageaudio.com.au


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT. The time now is 02:21 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.SEO by vBSEO 3.0.0
Copyright ©2004-2025 Audio Banter.
The comments are property of their posters.