![]() |
Amplifier power
"Fleetie" wrote in message
... Studiomaster were a UK company founded in the 1070s Been around for quite a while then! David. |
Amplifier power
David Looser wrote:
"Fleetie" wrote in message ... Studiomaster were a UK company founded in the 1070s Been around for quite a while then! David. They recorded the Bayeux tapestry. d |
Amplifier power
On Oct 21, 8:33 am, "David Looser"
wrote: Studiomaster were a UK company founded in the 1070s Does that mean their claim that they helped record the Battle of Hastings is suspect? Come to think of it, the album cover where William the Conquerer is crossing Abbey Road and there's a 1068 Morris Minor parked in the background should have tipped me off. |
Amplifier power
"Jim Lesurf" wrote in message
... Interesting that he seems able to narrow down all orchestras to a 1dB range like that. Reminiscent of the way undergrads sometimes write down a lab experiment result to as many significant figures as their hand calculator displays - regardless of having input figures only roughly accurate. :-) I've just flown back from the USA on a plane that was, according to the "flight information" channel on the in-flight entertainment screen, flying at a constant height of 37,000 feet - or 11277m. (Actually, according to my calculations, to the nearest metre, that should have been 11278m). Or is it possible that the actual height was 37,000 feet plus or minus quite a bit, and that there was a spurious precision to the "11277"? David. |
Amplifier power
David Looser wrote:
"Jim Lesurf" wrote in message ... Interesting that he seems able to narrow down all orchestras to a 1dB range like that. Reminiscent of the way undergrads sometimes write down a lab experiment result to as many significant figures as their hand calculator displays - regardless of having input figures only roughly accurate. :-) I've just flown back from the USA on a plane that was, according to the "flight information" channel on the in-flight entertainment screen, flying at a constant height of 37,000 feet - or 11277m. (Actually, according to my calculations, to the nearest metre, that should have been 11278m). Or is it possible that the actual height was 37,000 feet plus or minus quite a bit, and that there was a spurious precision to the "11277"? David. Just a rounding thing. If you round by truncating you get 11277, if you do it to the nearest you get 11278. I suspect the number has more to do with the autopilot demand setting than the actual height, though. d |
Amplifier power
"tony sayer" wrote in message
... No but theres a local station round these parts where the engineer does give a monkeys but the programme controller only knows LOUD LOUD and LOUDER!!! cos the bloke at the other station down the road is the same;; All thinking LOUD is better.. Did anyone hear on the news recently that the new CD from "Metallica" is so heavily compressed that even Heavy-Metal fans are complaining in their thousands? Good for them I say! David. |
Amplifier power
"Eeyore" wrote in message
... For me, radio is all but finished. Apart from Radio 4 of course. It's the same pap from every broadcaster. I can even recall several times changing channel and finding the very same track being played on the new one. Grrrrrrrr. You should try American Radio. I've recently spent many hours driving through California with only the radio for "entertainment". It makes UK commercial "pop" radio sound like high-culture by comparison! David. |
Amplifier power
In article , David Looser
wrote: "Jim Lesurf" wrote in message ... Interesting that he seems able to narrow down all orchestras to a 1dB range like that. Reminiscent of the way undergrads sometimes write down a lab experiment result to as many significant figures as their hand calculator displays - regardless of having input figures only roughly accurate. :-) I've just flown back from the USA on a plane that was, according to the "flight information" channel on the in-flight entertainment screen, flying at a constant height of 37,000 feet - or 11277m. (Actually, according to my calculations, to the nearest metre, that should have been 11278m). Or is it possible that the actual height was 37,000 feet plus or minus quite a bit, and that there was a spurious precision to the "11277"? I suspect your plane was more than 1 metre tall. :-) Did they say if the height was measured to the seat of the pilot's chair, or to some other reference? :-) Slainte, Jim -- Change 'noise' to 'jcgl' if you wish to email me. Electronics http://www.st-and.ac.uk/~www_pa/Scot...o/electron.htm Armstrong Audio http://www.audiomisc.co.uk/Armstrong/armstrong.html Audio Misc http://www.audiomisc.co.uk/index.html |
Amplifier power
"David Looser" wrote in
message "Jim Lesurf" wrote in message ... Interesting that he seems able to narrow down all orchestras to a 1dB range like that. Reminiscent of the way undergrads sometimes write down a lab experiment result to as many significant figures as their hand calculator displays - regardless of having input figures only roughly accurate. :-) I've just flown back from the USA on a plane that was, according to the "flight information" channel on the in-flight entertainment screen, flying at a constant height of 37,000 feet - or 11277m. (Actually, according to my calculations, to the nearest metre, that should have been 11278m). Or is it possible that the actual height was 37,000 feet plus or minus quite a bit, and that there was a spurious precision to the "11277"? If you are worried about an airplane's altitude to the 5th digit, you obviously need to find something else to do with your mind! ;-) BTW, which part of the plane was the measurement centered at? ;-) |
Amplifier power
GregS wrote: Eeyore wrote: GregS wrote: The RC4136 was used in a lot of stuff. It had a faster slew rate, and I measured up to 1.8 v/us, and was called a quad 741. Weird pins too. I know the one. Avoided it like the plague if only for the pinout ! Didn't TI make a TL075 with the same pinout ? Right, and I always wanted to use them in my old Soundcraftmen equalizer, then I could not get them. I was set up to make conversion boards but never finished. I still have that equalizer but I don't use it. TI have now deleted it. Little demand I suppose. I only know because I have a very early copy of the bifet manual. Graham |
All times are GMT. The time now is 08:15 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.0.0
Copyright ©2004-2006 AudioBanter.co.uk