![]() |
Amplifier power
In article ,
Robert Orban scribeth thus In article , says... Robert Orban wrote: says... Thanks Bob ! Him being the one who will be criticised on other groups for making DAB and FM ever more distorted;!... All modern DSP-based Optimods can be operated as exremely pure protection limiters if that is what the broadcaster prefers, and we offer presets to make this easy. I just make the artillery; I don't have any say in how broadcasters choose to set it up! Just how smart are the Optimods these days ? I assume they're DSP based now (oh you said so) and probably for some time. They're pretty smart :-). All of the manuals are available for free download from ftp.orban.com, and these provide detailed descriptions of their features. Our current top of the line processors are the 8500 for FM, the 9400 for AM, the 6300 for digital media, and the 8585 for surround. (The 8585 manual is coming soon; the otehr manuals are currently available.) I always though your objective was to reduce to the minimum any unwanted audible artifacts through multiple band processing and the like.. Yes. One can use a special form of multiband processing (with coupled bands that only uncouple when necessary to prevent audible spectral gain intermodulation) for protection limiting. To process for loudness, one really needs to start with multiband processing and complement it with various peak limiting tricks like distortion- cancelled clipping, where the clipping distortion is removed in some frequency bands. The nice side effect of doing such complex loudness processing is that when backed off to give a more "purist" sound, the processor causes far fewer audible artifacts than a simpler processor would. The biggest influence on what a processor can and cannot do is to untangle the mess made by a lot of radio stations using bit reduced material on their playout systems and compounding that with more bit reduction on their STL's.. Sometimes that materiel is transcoded from MP3 to MP2 and vice versa.. There is a local community station hereabouts that has a simple 2200D and a linear PCM link with a numerical controlled modulator. A lot of the time they do use MP3 etc as contributions from the community they serve with predictable results. But when they play direct off CD the results whilst not quite as "loud" as the local commercials .. are superb:)).. As is live music content;!... -- Tony Sayer |
Amplifier power
In article ,
says... Robert Orban wrote: says... Robert Orban wrote: says... Thanks Bob ! Him being the one who will be criticised on other groups for making DAB and FM ever more distorted;!... All modern DSP-based Optimods can be operated as exremely pure protection limiters if that is what the broadcaster prefers, and we offer presets to make this easy. I just make the artillery; I don't have any say in how broadcasters choose to set it up! BTW, did you ever use 'optical' compression ? Vactrols etc. Only once, for a cue amplifier in a one-off broadcast console I built in the late '60s for a friend's radio station. I drove the lamp from the output of the cue power amplifier, which made the compressor very cost-effective. Optical compressors are very interesting because of their complex, program- dependent attack and release times. However, IMO they are not adequately repeatable in a mass-production environment, so I never seriously considered using them commercially. One of my competitors did (in a four-band processor) and it caused him and his customers no end of grief with unit-to-unit consistency problems and temperature sensitivity. I had them selected by Silonex and we had no such problems. http://www1.silonex.com/ Their characteristics are indeed very interesting and seeming inherently suited to music. My first use of them was in a mixer-amplifier to avoid accidental serious overload. Tuning the time constants you could move the master fader from '-5' where the amp was briefly clipping (largely inaudibly) to '+5' and you could whizz the fader back and forth between the 2 points and the sound was almost completely unaffected. It was as if you weren't doing anything ! It would allow ~ 1% THD on tone and then cut-in. More lately we used a Chinese device. Less consistent so required more selection into grades and the fitting of grade dependent Rs on the control board. 1/8th the price though. I forgot to mention that we at Orban have had substantial experience with optos, but not for use with compressors. In the mid 80s, we did some R&D for a digitally controlled analog parameteric EQ that used optos as the variable resistance elements for adjusting Fc, BW, and gain. We used dual optos driven by a single lamp, with one side handling the program audio and the other side having DC applied to it to close a servo feedback loop. This made the control law predictable and stable. We relied on close matching of the two sections of the opto, particularly over temperature. Because the optos had too much soft nonlinearity to produce state of the art distortion measurements, we eventually dumped them and ended up going with MDACs even though the latter caused audible glitching when the controls were operated, unlike the optos, which sounded completely smooth. But the MDACs were much more linear. |
All times are GMT. The time now is 02:51 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.0.0
Copyright ©2004-2006 AudioBanter.co.uk