![]() |
Internet radio - classical music, etc
"Serge Auckland" wrote in message
... Perhaps it won't but what I'm saying is that mobile broadband internet radio will become more popular than portable radio receivers, whether AM, FM or DAB. If adequate quality for the purpose is available at only 32kbps, then bandwidth is no bar to this developing. Broadcasting covers large areas at low cost, mobile broadband covers small areas at high cost. If you are right, then the mobile networks will have serious problems in coping with the bandwidth demand within the allocated radio spectrum. Unlike wire-based broadband you can't just run in extra capacity, the only option is to further sub-divide the cells, which is very expensive. David. |
Internet radio - classical music, etc
In article , Serge Auckland
scribeth thus "David Looser" wrote in message ... "tony sayer" wrote in message ... From what I've heard in the industry its only the BBC who "wants" T-DAB.. The commercial radio side just sees it as another expense they can do without!, whereas the BBC has the licence payer to pay for it all for them..... From what I hear it's Ofcom who wants DAB, because they want to kill off analogue :-( You know, the idea that the government can make DAB the "primary network" for radio seriously overestimates their power. Well who's going to argue with Ofcom and the DMCS?.. Who's going to take any notice of Ofcom and DMCS? - I'm referring to the buying and listening public here, most of whom have never heard of either. The public wont buy DAB sets because DMCS and Ofcom want it, quite the contrary. The public overwhelmingly want analogue radio to continue and no government with it's eye on the next election will allow Ofcom to kill off analogue radio if there isn't a viable alternative. Internet radio is becoming increasingly popular, particularly for the "listen again" type of services. If DAB is to make inroads it'll need to provide something the public want. Neither Ofcom nor DMCS (nor the BBC for that matter) can make the public buy DAB if it fails to deliver. David. Considering that Ofcom are still awarding 8 year Commercial FM licenses, Beg to differ guv .. I don't think they are offering anymore FM licences or extensions to existing FM services since the report the other day with the exception of the community sector.. And they haven't worked out how to let them go on DAB MUX's at a price they can afford yet.. Not that any seem to want to;!... there's no likelihood of FM being turned off until 2017 at the earliest. They are currently awarding a large number of 5 year Community Radio FM licenses, so the prospects for FM to continue well into the future seem clear. DAB will continue to be of minority interest until mainstream car manufacturers start fitting DAB receivers as standard. And anyone got a "clear as crystal" ball to see that happening anytime soon;!.. With so many cars now being fitted with "built-in" radios, the aftermarket for car radio upgrades is shrinking, and in terms of the general public, the scope for upgrades to a DAB car radio seem limited when cars are fitted with perfectly usable FM sets, even where an upgrade is possible. Indeed a fact thats often overlooked by those pushing the shagged out old digital cow;!.. As mobile internet gets cheaper and more widespread, I think it more likely that Joe Public will listen to Internet Radio on their mobile 'phone rather than buy a DAB portable. Well they might if they get the coverage as it ought be which is still very poor in parts of East Anglia.. Till then theres always FM:))... S. -- http://audiopages.googlepages.com -- Tony Sayer |
Internet radio - classical music, etc
In article , Dave Plowman (News)
scribeth thus In article , tony sayer wrote: From what I've heard in the industry its only the BBC who "wants" T-DAB.. Which industry? Equipment suppliers on both sides of the market are always delighted with such things. Equipment suppliers may well be seeing the money this things cost but I'm referring to the industry that has to pay for them;(... The commercial radio side just sees it as another expense they can do without!, whereas the BBC has the licence payer to pay for it all for them..... Radio is already at saturation level so few if any *new* listeners would be provided by a different format. All you might do is poach from another one. Who needs DAB anyway;?.. -- Tony Sayer |
Internet radio - classical music, etc
In article , Dave Plowman (News)
scribeth thus In article , BBC is biased towards DAB wrote: I've already explained quite enough for most to understand. But you decided to rubbish that. Absolutely. You described your methodology of recording the samples as follows: "Some time ago I set up a test. Recorded the same clips from R1,3 and 4 off DAB, FM and AM (AM using a Quad AM3 with proper aerial) Adjusted Dave .. Can you answer this question of -when- you did this please?. levels so they were subjectively the same." Could you explain how you recorded R1, R3 and R4 via AM? Which part of 'some time ago' needs explaining? Just answer the question, its quite reasonable?.. -- Tony Sayer |
Internet radio - classical music, etc
"tony sayer" wrote in message ... In article , Serge Auckland scribeth thus "David Looser" wrote in message ... "tony sayer" wrote in message ... From what I've heard in the industry its only the BBC who "wants" T-DAB.. The commercial radio side just sees it as another expense they can do without!, whereas the BBC has the licence payer to pay for it all for them..... From what I hear it's Ofcom who wants DAB, because they want to kill off analogue :-( You know, the idea that the government can make DAB the "primary network" for radio seriously overestimates their power. Well who's going to argue with Ofcom and the DMCS?.. Who's going to take any notice of Ofcom and DMCS? - I'm referring to the buying and listening public here, most of whom have never heard of either. The public wont buy DAB sets because DMCS and Ofcom want it, quite the contrary. The public overwhelmingly want analogue radio to continue and no government with it's eye on the next election will allow Ofcom to kill off analogue radio if there isn't a viable alternative. Internet radio is becoming increasingly popular, particularly for the "listen again" type of services. If DAB is to make inroads it'll need to provide something the public want. Neither Ofcom nor DMCS (nor the BBC for that matter) can make the public buy DAB if it fails to deliver. David. Considering that Ofcom are still awarding 8 year Commercial FM licenses, Beg to differ guv .. I don't think they are offering anymore FM licences or extensions to existing FM services since the report the other day with the exception of the community sector.. And they haven't worked out how to let them go on DAB MUX's at a price they can afford yet.. Not that any seem to want to;!... there's no likelihood of FM being turned off until 2017 at the earliest. They are currently awarding a large number of 5 year Community Radio FM licenses, so the prospects for FM to continue well into the future seem clear. DAB will continue to be of minority interest until mainstream car manufacturers start fitting DAB receivers as standard. And anyone got a "clear as crystal" ball to see that happening anytime soon;!.. With so many cars now being fitted with "built-in" radios, the aftermarket for car radio upgrades is shrinking, and in terms of the general public, the scope for upgrades to a DAB car radio seem limited when cars are fitted with perfectly usable FM sets, even where an upgrade is possible. Indeed a fact thats often overlooked by those pushing the shagged out old digital cow;!.. As mobile internet gets cheaper and more widespread, I think it more likely that Joe Public will listen to Internet Radio on their mobile 'phone rather than buy a DAB portable. Well they might if they get the coverage as it ought be which is still very poor in parts of East Anglia.. Till then theres always FM:))... S. -- http://audiopages.googlepages.com -- Tony Sayer I thought I saw a Press Release from Ofcom just a few days ago saying Star FM in Cambridge had either been awarded a further 8 year license, or were being fast-tracked as no-one else had applied. I also recall a station in Surrey having their license renewed recently. Did I imagine it? Could be, I get easily confused these days. S. -- http://audiopages.googlepages.com |
Internet radio - classical music, etc
"David Looser" wrote in message
"Serge Auckland" wrote in message ... Perhaps it won't but what I'm saying is that mobile broadband internet radio will become more popular than portable radio receivers, whether AM, FM or DAB. If adequate quality for the purpose is available at only 32kbps, then bandwidth is no bar to this developing. Broadcasting covers large areas at low cost, mobile broadband covers small areas at high cost. There are broadcast standards for the mobile phone networks, you know. There's teh MBMS standard for 3G now, and the upgrade of that (evolved-MBMS, or eMBMS) isn't long away, and that includes large-area coverage using single-frequency networks, like what DAB uses. If you are right, then the mobile networks will have serious problems in coping with the bandwidth demand within the allocated radio spectrum. No, they could just deploy eMBMS. Unlike wire-based broadband you can't just run in extra capacity, the only option is to further sub-divide the cells, which is very expensive. eMBMS can cover multiple cells. -- Steve - www.digitalradiotech.co.uk - Digital Radio News & Info The adoption of DAB was the most incompetent technical decision ever made in the history of UK broadcasting: http://www.digitalradiotech.co.uk/da...ion_of_dab.htm |
Internet radio - classical music, etc
I thought I saw a Press Release from Ofcom just a few days ago saying Star FM in Cambridge had either been awarded a further 8 year license, or were being fast-tracked as no-one else had applied. I also recall a station in Surrey having their license renewed recently. Did I imagine it? Could be, I get easily confused these days. Yes that was a licence "renewal" of an existing station.. not a "new" licenced station as such... S. -- Tony Sayer |
Internet radio - classical music, etc
In article ,
BBC is biased towards DAB wrote: so it would mean using their computer. Wi-Fi Internet radio doesn't require your computer to be switched on at all. Shows how little you know about it. Most would consider Wi-Fi to be part of a computer installation. Which probably isn't in the best place for using while in the kitchen. Where many do listen to the radio. Same as the bathroom. But if you live in one room it makes little difference. I have a Wi-Fi Internet radio in the kitchen - have done for getting on for 2 years, and I wouldn't want anything less - vast range of choice, better audio quality, and you can listen to your own music streamed from your PC. With that PC switched off? Make up your mind. -- *I'm planning to be spontaneous tomorrow * Dave Plowman London SW To e-mail, change noise into sound. |
Internet radio - classical music, etc
In article ,
BBC is biased towards DAB wrote: I came up with the idea that led to the design of DAB+, Bwahahahahahahahahahahahah... -- *Dance like nobody's watching. Dave Plowman London SW To e-mail, change noise into sound. |
Internet radio - classical music, etc
In article ,
tony sayer wrote: "Some time ago I set up a test. Recorded the same clips from R1,3 and 4 off DAB, FM and AM (AM using a Quad AM3 with proper aerial) Adjusted Dave .. Can you answer this question of -when- you did this please?. I'm afraid I can't give you the exact date. But not long after DAB started. levels so they were subjectively the same." Could you explain how you recorded R1, R3 and R4 via AM? Which part of 'some time ago' needs explaining? Just answer the question, its quite reasonable?.. No question from our DAB 'expert' is ever reasonable. They are all loaded. -- *Wrinkled was not one of the things I wanted to be when I grew up Dave Plowman London SW To e-mail, change noise into sound. |
All times are GMT. The time now is 09:48 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.0.0
Copyright ©2004-2006 AudioBanter.co.uk