Frequency response of the ear
 

"Arny Krueger"

Do some homework, first. Google gives 100,000 hits for "dummy head
recording".


** Nope - its only 1750 hits for the phrase.




...... Phil

Frequency response of the ear
 

Arny Krueger wrote:

Google has interesting stuff on "ear acoustics" such as:

Umm, you just told the guy to go google. Like I just did.


You can help people through http://lmgtfy.com. It creates a URL you can
send them to help them learn to
help themselves.

Examples of uses:

"What do you mean by free market?"
http://tinyurl.com/dzyzdm

"Pneumonoultramicroscopicsilicovolcanoconiosis ? What's that?"
http://tinyurl.com/d7e4yq

"What do you mean, 'no'?"
http://tinyurl.com/cb2yed

Frequency response of the ear
 

"Phil Allison" wrote in message
...

"Arny Krueger"

Do some homework, first. Google gives 100,000 hits for "dummy head
recording".


** Nope - its only 1750 hits for the phrase.



I get 1,730

http://www.moirac.adsl24.co.uk/dummy.jpg


(I learned a long time ago to take Arnie's claims with a shovelful of salt -
he's like a lot of people who try to *speak with authority* when most of the
time they've no idea..!!! ;-)

Frequency response of the ear
 

Eiron wrote:

Eeyore wrote:
Eiron wrote:

I was thinking about doing some dummy head recording and the effect on
frequency response
of using an electret capsule in a model of an ear, compared to just
placing it on the surface of a head-sized sphere.

Any thoughts before I start moulding body parts in plaster?

If you model the ear's shape then you'll double the effect when listening
to the recording. Not required therefore I'd say.

Surely not if you're listening on in-ear phones.

Yuk ! How could you ? All that ear wax ! Besides aren't they pretty crap ?

Graham

Frequency response of the ear
 

Nick Gorham wrote:

Phil Allison wrote:
"Brian Gaffe"

You cannot separate the brain from the ear ...

** More ridiculous BULL **** !!!

**** off - you know nothing, TROLLING ASS !!

..... Phil

Unlike separating brain from mouth and keyboard...

Excellent response ! ;~)

Grham

Frequency response of the ear
 

"Keith Git"
"Phil Allison"
"Arny Krueger"

Do some homework, first. Google gives 100,000 hits for "dummy head
recording".


** Nope - its only 1750 hits for the phrase.


I get 1,730


** Google is censoring about 20 hits from your delicate eyes ....


(I learned a long time ago to take Arnie's claims with a shovelful of
salt - he's like a lot of people who try to *speak with authority* when
most of the time they've no idea..!!! ;-)


** Arny is a compewter geek by nature and inclination.

Like any computer, he can only manipulate the data - but not illuminate
it.




....... Phil

Frequency response of the ear
 

"Phil Anus Hole" wrote


** Google is censoring about 20 hits from your delicate eyes ....


That'll be my other half - she's probably got it set for *no titties* or
somesuch.....



(I learned a long time ago to take Arnie's claims with a shovelful of
salt - he's like a lot of people who try to *speak with authority* when
most of the time they've no idea..!!! ;-)


** Arny is a compewter geek by nature and inclination.

Like any computer, he can only manipulate the data - but not illuminate
it.


The evidence is he can't even do that accurately....

Frequency response of the ear
 

In article ,
Keith G wrote:

"Phil Anus Hole" wrote


** Google is censoring about 20 hits from your delicate eyes ....


That'll be my other half - she's probably got it set for *no titties* or
somesuch.....

(I learned a long time ago to take Arnie's claims with a shovelful of
salt - he's like a lot of people who try to *speak with authority*
when most of the time they've no idea..!!! ;-)


** Arny is a compewter geek by nature and inclination.

Like any computer, he can only manipulate the data - but not
illuminate it.


The evidence is he can't even do that accurately....

If you Google dummy head recording without the quotation marks you get
more than 100,000 hits.

I'm sure everyone will be fascinated by this.

--
*It's a thankless job, but I've got a lot of Karma to burn off

Dave Plowman London SW
To e-mail, change noise into sound.

Frequency response of the ear
 

On Thu, 16 Apr 2009 23:02:36 +0100, "Dave Plowman (News)"
wrote:

Years ago when dummy head recording was popular I attended a demonstration
where all sorts of techniques had been used - including a real skull. And
to be perfectly honest the standard two omnis spaced apart the same sort
of distance as ears and separated by a disc approximating to a cross
sectional of a head worked as well as anything.

Did you also hear the Sennheiser record with one side in English and
the other in German?

Interestingly, for me the effect of the German side was much less than
for the English side - probably because the spoken hints were no
longer present. (I did not speak any German at that time.) The power
of the mind to affect perception never ceases to amaze me. ;-)

--
Chris Isbell
Southampton, UK

Frequency response of the ear
 

"Dave Plowman (News)" wrote in message
...
In article ,
Keith G wrote:

"Phil Anus Hole" wrote


** Google is censoring about 20 hits from your delicate eyes ....


That'll be my other half - she's probably got it set for *no titties* or
somesuch.....

(I learned a long time ago to take Arnie's claims with a shovelful of
salt - he's like a lot of people who try to *speak with authority*
when most of the time they've no idea..!!! ;-)


** Arny is a compewter geek by nature and inclination.

Like any computer, he can only manipulate the data - but not
illuminate it.


The evidence is he can't even do that accurately....

If you Google dummy head recording without the quotation marks you get
more than 100,000 hits.

I'm sure everyone will be fascinated by this.


I wouldn't bank on it.....