![]() |
Music download sites offering CD quality.
"Adrian C" wrote in message
... Michael Chare wrote: Thanks I found the music that I was looking for on another web site. I was in fact able to save a track about 700kb long. The file is .ra and I can play it with Real Player and winamp (with an additional codec) but as yet I have been unable to convert the file to a more useful format. However unfortunately the music has clearly been taken from a some what scratchy record. Yuk, that don't sound good. Er, Real audio, that really WON'T sound good. Michael, please have a look at installing Spotify and trying it out for yourself. If you need an invite to try the free* version just ask, I've got a few to give. *The free version is limited to 160 kbit/s Ogg Vorbis, but will easily surpass what you have there. Thanks for your offer, I will think about it. I have since found songs.sky.com and they do have the CD that I was looking for. I can play a short clip and it clearly sounds much better. They say that all music is either in 192 or 320 kbps MP3 format. What they don't say is what they use for a a particular album or song. My impression is that Sky have a large catalogue. -- Michael Chare |
Music download sites offering CD quality.
"Michael Chare" wrote in
message "Jim Lesurf" wrote in message ... In article , Adrian C wrote: Michael Chare wrote: There are many web sites that will let you download music in mp3 format, though not all show what bit rate the files are stored in. Can anyone recommend any sites that have a large selection of music in a CD quality format, such as WMA Lossless or FLAC 16/44.1 http://www.linnrecords.com/ IIRC Chandos also do this. Although personally I prefer to just buy a CD. :-) Thanks, the lossless downloads don't cost much less than the CDs so I take your point. Immediate gratification has a lot to do with the popularity of downloads. |
Music download sites offering CD quality.
"Michael Chare" wrote in message ... "Jim Lesurf" wrote in message ... In article , Adrian C wrote: Michael Chare wrote: There are many web sites that will let you download music in mp3 format, though not all show what bit rate the files are stored in. Can anyone recommend any sites that have a large selection of music in a CD quality format, such as WMA Lossless or FLAC 16/44.1 http://www.linnrecords.com/ IIRC Chandos also do this. Although personally I prefer to just buy a CD. :-) Thanks, the lossless downloads don't cost much less than the CDs Which is a ludicrous proposition of course, but that doesn't surprise me in the least given the sort of person who will be downloading them. What I want to know is if these are available online presumably anywhere in the world, how do they apply the usual ***** Britain* surcharges for 'digital music' - which have been typically US x 2 and Europe x 1.5 for about the last quarter of a century....?? |
Music download sites offering CD quality.
Michael Chare wrote:
Thanks for your offer, I will think about it. I have since found songs.sky.com and they do have the CD that I was looking for. I can play a short clip and it clearly sounds much better. They say that all music is either in 192 or 320 kbps MP3 format. What they don't say is what they use for a a particular album or song. My impression is that Sky have a large catalogue. Fair enough. Good you found your tracks! BTW Today's stats for Spotify for the UK Albums: 502,025 Artists: 412,012 Tracks: 5,704,792 (Tip: Enter 'year:0-3000' in the search for the above totals) Which at the moment is round about similar to Sky Songs. However there will be differences in all these streaming and download services on what is available. However IMO Spotify's interface is better worked out, can be taken portable, (and no funds go towards that nasty man...) -- Adrian C |
Music download sites offering CD quality.
"Arny Krueger" wrote in message
... "Michael Chare" wrote in message "Jim Lesurf" wrote in message ... In article , Adrian C wrote: Michael Chare wrote: There are many web sites that will let you download music in mp3 format, though not all show what bit rate the files are stored in. Can anyone recommend any sites that have a large selection of music in a CD quality format, such as WMA Lossless or FLAC 16/44.1 http://www.linnrecords.com/ IIRC Chandos also do this. Although personally I prefer to just buy a CD. :-) Thanks, the lossless downloads don't cost much less than the CDs so I take your point. Immediate gratification has a lot to do with the popularity of downloads. Yes, I was looking at it a different way! I can understand it if the record companies don't want to hold atocks of old CDs in their back catalogues. Sales are no doubt falling. The CD technolgy will go the way of 78s, Vinyl LPs and cassette tapes. You can now store more than 1000 CDs on a single disc drive. So I would like to see record companies making their complete catalogues available online so that people can download what they want. -- Michael Chare |
Music download sites offering CD quality.
"Michael Chare" wrote in message
I can understand it if the record companies don't want to hold atocks of old CDs in their back catalogues. Sales are no doubt falling. The CD technolgy will go the way of 78s, Vinyl LPs and cassette tapes. You can now store more than 1000 CDs on a single disc drive. I agree, I see the commercial CD vanishing within a relatively short time. As sales continue to decline the economics of manufacture and distribution will make CDs too expensive for the record companies to bother with. Ironically I see the LP as possibly outliving the CD as it will continue to appeal to the "fetish" market (i.e. those to whom owning a physical object is really important). But that market won't be enough to save more than a handful of record shops, the vast majority of which will disappear off our high streets within the next decade. So I would like to see record companies making their complete catalogues available online so that people can download what they want. I'm sure it will happen, download distribution makes it economic to continue to make slow-moving lines available. Deletion from the catalogue will no longer make economic or marketing sense. There may be a few recordings which can't be made available for download, due to rights issues etc. But I'm sure the vast majority of once deleted commercial recordings will eventually become available again for purchase by download. David. |
Music download sites offering CD quality.
"David Looser" wrote in message
... "Michael Chare" wrote in message I can understand it if the record companies don't want to hold atocks of old CDs in their back catalogues. Sales are no doubt falling. The CD technolgy will go the way of 78s, Vinyl LPs and cassette tapes. You can now store more than 1000 CDs on a single disc drive. I agree, I see the commercial CD vanishing within a relatively short time. As sales continue to decline the economics of manufacture and distribution will make CDs too expensive for the record companies to bother with. Ironically I see the LP as possibly outliving the CD as it will continue to appeal to the "fetish" market (i.e. those to whom owning a physical object is really important). But that market won't be enough to save more than a handful of record shops, the vast majority of which will disappear off our high streets within the next decade. So I would like to see record companies making their complete catalogues available online so that people can download what they want. I'm sure it will happen, download distribution makes it economic to continue to make slow-moving lines available. Deletion from the catalogue will no longer make economic or marketing sense. There may be a few recordings which can't be made available for download, due to rights issues etc. But I'm sure the vast majority of once deleted commercial recordings will eventually become available again for purchase by download. David. If that does happen then it will immediately disadvantage a large proportion of the population - those that don't have (or can't have) Internet access. What is more the load on the Internet infrastructure that it will impose - especially for those who want the best quality downloads (e.g. classical and jazz) - will drag it down to a crawl. It may happen in time, but a LOT of money will have to be spent first, and whilst everything is driven by bean-counters and short-termism I don't see it coming about. -- Woody harrogate three at ntlworld dot com |
Music download sites offering CD quality.
On Sun, 29 Nov 2009 08:58:59 -0000, "Woody"
wrote: "David Looser" wrote in message ... "Michael Chare" wrote in message I can understand it if the record companies don't want to hold atocks of old CDs in their back catalogues. Sales are no doubt falling. The CD technolgy will go the way of 78s, Vinyl LPs and cassette tapes. You can now store more than 1000 CDs on a single disc drive. I agree, I see the commercial CD vanishing within a relatively short time. As sales continue to decline the economics of manufacture and distribution will make CDs too expensive for the record companies to bother with. Ironically I see the LP as possibly outliving the CD as it will continue to appeal to the "fetish" market (i.e. those to whom owning a physical object is really important). But that market won't be enough to save more than a handful of record shops, the vast majority of which will disappear off our high streets within the next decade. So I would like to see record companies making their complete catalogues available online so that people can download what they want. I'm sure it will happen, download distribution makes it economic to continue to make slow-moving lines available. Deletion from the catalogue will no longer make economic or marketing sense. There may be a few recordings which can't be made available for download, due to rights issues etc. But I'm sure the vast majority of once deleted commercial recordings will eventually become available again for purchase by download. David. If that does happen then it will immediately disadvantage a large proportion of the population - those that don't have (or can't have) Internet access. I think the law of supply and demand will deal with that. Back in the day, large groups of people were disadvantaged by lack of a record player or CD player. People catch up. As far as I know the only people who actually can't have Internet access are convicted terrorists and paedophiles. What is more the load on the Internet infrastructure that it will impose - especially for those who want the best quality downloads (e.g. classical and jazz) - will drag it down to a crawl. In the early days of broadband, many ISPs went in for local cacheing of data, to help out their struggling backbone infrastructure. It didn't work because they underestimated the dynamic nature of web pages. But whole sites dedicated to serving music and films are a different ball games, and local caches at the POPs would fix that issue. It may happen in time, but a LOT of money will have to be spent first, and whilst everything is driven by bean-counters and short-termism I don't see it coming about. At some point there will be a short (or at least medium) term advantage and it will happen. That will be a one-way street, I think. d |
Music download sites offering CD quality.
In article , David Looser
wrote: "Michael Chare" wrote in message I can understand it if the record companies don't want to hold atocks of old CDs in their back catalogues. Sales are no doubt falling. The CD technolgy will go the way of 78s, Vinyl LPs and cassette tapes. You can now store more than 1000 CDs on a single disc drive. I agree, I see the commercial CD vanishing within a relatively short time. That may well be so for 'mass market' audio CDs. But I suspect the future will be more diverse and so CDDA in some form may persist. IIRC some small 'serious music' companies are already experimenting with selling 'CDs' by generating 'on demand' CDRs when a disc is ordered. That method could easily accompany downloading since writing CDs in that way is a low-cost option. I also suspect people will become wary of 'put all your CDs onto a HD' when they experience HD failures and/or proprietary software interfering with what they are 'allowed' to play or copy. An advantage of the CDDA format is that is has become a sort of 'lingua franca'. You can use CDDA to store musical recordings to plater play or load into a range of devices. You can snail-mail them to people who have no broadband connection, etc. So I won't be suprised if the traditional commerical CD vanishes for mass markets like pop music. But I have my doubts that it will totally vanish. Although it may be replaced in time by some other 'lingua franca', as yet I haven't seen one establish itself. Computer-based formats tend to suffer from the 'Windows effect' where microsoft try to break/change/control things and so having a stable format can be disrupted. And devices like DVD players tend to treat formats other than their primary standard in ways that vary from one player/brand to another. BTW I ordered 8 CDs this morning. None of them 'pop' music. :-) Slainte, Jim -- Please use the address on the audiomisc page if you wish to email me. Electronics http://www.st-and.ac.uk/~www_pa/Scot...o/electron.htm Armstrong Audio http://www.audiomisc.co.uk/Armstrong/armstrong.html Audio Misc http://www.audiomisc.co.uk/index.html |
Music download sites offering CD quality.
"Woody" wrote
If that does happen then it will immediately disadvantage a large proportion of the population - those that don't have (or can't have) Internet access. Large? How large is that proportion of the population? IMO is small and getting smaller all the time. How many people are too far from a record shop to readily get to one? What is more the load on the Internet infrastructure that it will impose - especially for those who want the best quality downloads (e.g. classical and jazz) - will drag it down to a crawl. Trivial compared to the load imposed by video streaming, eg. BBC iPlayer. It may happen in time, but a LOT of money will have to be spent first, and whilst everything is driven by bean-counters and short-termism I don't see it coming about. It's precisely *because* everything is driven by bean-counters that I see this happening. Put simply sales by download are much cheaper for the record companies. David. -- Woody harrogate three at ntlworld dot com |
All times are GMT. The time now is 04:49 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.0.0
Copyright ©2004-2006 AudioBanter.co.uk