Vinyl Memories From W.H.Smith
 

"Dave Plowman (News)" wrote in message
...
In article ,
Keith G wrote:
As you well know I've been posting almost
anything and everything trying to boost the traffic in here

I'll ask again - why?



Ok, I'll tell you *again*!

Because I had been told on numerous occasions this group was *stone dead*
when I was unsubscribed. Is this not correct? It was certainly very quiet
when I returned.

Anyway, when two different people (one lurker, one current poster) said so
within the space of a couple of days, I finally hooked it up again; said
hello 'how's things?' to everybody (including you which caught you properly
on the hop and made you squirm all ugly-like, IIRC) and gaily started
throwing posts on and starting threads as and when summat came up I thought
someone would find even a tiny bit interesting, to fill out some of the
silences.


FFS, there are loads of newsgroups. Why not leave this one for the
discussion of on topic things?


Not everybody is all over Usenet like a rash, as you are - some people like
their online chitchat on and off topic in the one place with people they
feel they have got to know. I really can't see what all your squealing is
about - no posts in this group are compulsory reading and, especially as
traffic here is almost non-existent, why TF does it bother you so much? What
do you fear?


And join the ones for the topics you
obviously prefer to discuss than audio?


Actually, I don't like *any* newgroups; like most of the people who frequent
them, they are superfluous, lifespan-wasting and *creepy* and 'forums' are
even creepier. This group is only a silly habit that's goes back a long way
and is all too easy to continue with - probably because you don't seem to be
able to stop replying to my posts?

Trust me, if we had an upstairs and the computer was up there and I had to
trudge up to it to use it, I wouldn't be on it twice in one day!!

(Wiki, IMDB, eBay and Amazon are plenty enough for any sane person..!! :-)


I could understand you asking an off topic question if you had a high
regard for the opinions of those who post here...


You are quite right in that I have lost my regard for one or two here - my
loss, I'm sure... ;-)

Now, forget all that ****, how about you answer my question and give me the
information I asked for?

"While I'm on - you're obviously at a bit of a loose end, why don't you
confirm some figures for me? As you well know I've been posting almost
anything and everything trying to boost the traffic in here and I've had a
quick count-up of my latest 'OT video' thread ('You can fool the ear...')
and I make it 7 (or 8?) people posted a total of 53 times in that thread,
with no less than 12 of them coming from *you*...??"

@:-)



--
*Elephants are the only mammals that can't jump *

Dave Plowman London SW
To e-mail, change noise into sound.

Vinyl Memories From W.H.Smith
 

In article , Dave Plowman (News)
wrote:
In article , Keith G
wrote:
As you well know I've been posting almost anything and everything
trying to boost the traffic in here

I'll ask again - why?

Dave, just my opinion, but, I really do think you are wasting your time and
just giving Keith more chances to present his own ego-boost that he is
somehow the 'saviour' of this group by generating loads of content-free
argument and irrelevances to what is on-topic. If other people need that,
leave them to it.

For me, the sad thing is that I suspect his behaviour deters some others
from making more informative contributions and engaging in conversations
for constructive reasons. If people respond to him he grabs that as a
reason to continue. If they don't and people have been deterred by his
behaviour he decides the group needs him as a saviour.

Keith has made plain he posts because he wants to 'win' arguments, stir
things up, and be the center of things. i.e. a troll.

Maxim 1 of usenet has been "don't feed the trolls' for ages. The reasons
being as shown in this thread and many others involving Keith. I did
repeatedly try having conversations with him on the assumption he wasn't a
troll. But in the end I found every time this was a waste of effort.

You have more patience that I, though. So if you want to press on I'll
leave you to it... :-)

Slainte,

Jim

--
Please use the address on the audiomisc page if you wish to email me.
Electronics http://www.st-and.ac.uk/~www_pa/Scot...o/electron.htm
Armstrong Audio http://www.audiomisc.co.uk/Armstrong/armstrong.html
Audio Misc http://www.audiomisc.co.uk/index.html

Vinyl Memories From W.H.Smith
 

In article ,
Keith G wrote:

"Dave Plowman (News)" wrote in message
...
In article ,
Keith G wrote:
As you well know I've been posting almost
anything and everything trying to boost the traffic in here

I'll ask again - why?



Ok, I'll tell you *again*!

Because I had been told on numerous occasions this group was *stone
dead* when I was unsubscribed. Is this not correct? It was certainly
very quiet when I returned.

So? You must be the only person who only subscribes to one news group.
Can't you get someone to show you how to add others?
If it's dead it's because those who are subscribed have nothing to say at
that point in time. But are likely active in others.

Anyway, when two different people (one lurker, one current poster) said
so within the space of a couple of days, I finally hooked it up again;
said hello 'how's things?' to everybody (including you which caught you
properly on the hop and made you squirm all ugly-like, IIRC) and gaily
started throwing posts on and starting threads as and when summat came
up I thought someone would find even a tiny bit interesting, to fill
out some of the silences.

Ah. Back to the knitting circle again. Is that too quiet for you?


FFS, there are loads of newsgroups. Why not leave this one for the
discussion of on topic things?


Not everybody is all over Usenet like a rash, as you are - some people
like their online chitchat on and off topic in the one place with
people they feel they have got to know.

But not love - by the way you slag off so many.

I really can't see what all
your squealing is about - no posts in this group are compulsory reading
and, especially as traffic here is almost non-existent, why TF does it
bother you so much? What do you fear?

Perhaps it's because I try and keep to the etiquette of newsgroups. Not
try and take them over like you.


And join the ones for the topics you
obviously prefer to discuss than audio?


Actually, I don't like *any* newgroups; like most of the people who
frequent them, they are superfluous, lifespan-wasting and *creepy* and
'forums' are even creepier. This group is only a silly habit that's
goes back a long way and is all too easy to continue with - probably
because you don't seem to be able to stop replying to my posts?

Pot kettle. You've never ever been able to resist having the last word -
or trying. So I'll keep on putting my oar in just to annoy you.

Trust me, if we had an upstairs and the computer was up there and I had
to trudge up to it to use it, I wouldn't be on it twice in one day!!

Are you that sickly? Sorry, I didn't know. Is it sheltered accommodation
you live in?

(Wiki, IMDB, eBay and Amazon are plenty enough for any sane person..!! :-)


I could understand you asking an off topic question if you had a high
regard for the opinions of those who post here...


You are quite right in that I have lost my regard for one or two here -
my loss, I'm sure... ;-)

Now, forget all that ****, how about you answer my question and give me
the information I asked for?

What would that be? And I'm certainly not going to put myself out for you.


"While I'm on - you're obviously at a bit of a loose end, why don't you
confirm some figures for me? As you well know I've been posting almost
anything and everything trying to boost the traffic in here and I've had
a quick count-up of my latest 'OT video' thread ('You can fool the
ear...') and I make it 7 (or 8?) people posted a total of 53 times in
that thread, with no less than 12 of them coming from *you*...??"

Only to try and correct your rubbish.


@:-)



--
*Elephants are the only mammals that can't jump *

Dave Plowman London SW
To e-mail, change noise into sound.

--
*Toilet stolen from police station. Cops have nothing to go on.

Dave Plowman London SW
To e-mail, change noise into sound.

Vinyl Memories From W.H.Smith
 

"Dave Plowman (News)" wrote in message
...
In article ,
Keith G wrote:

"Dave Plowman (News)" wrote in message
...
In article ,
Keith G wrote:
As you well know I've been posting almost
anything and everything trying to boost the traffic in here

I'll ask again - why?



Ok, I'll tell you *again*!

Because I had been told on numerous occasions this group was *stone
dead* when I was unsubscribed. Is this not correct? It was certainly
very quiet when I returned.

So? You must be the only person who only subscribes to one news group.
Can't you get someone to show you how to add others?
If it's dead it's because those who are subscribed have nothing to say at
that point in time. But are likely active in others.

Anyway, when two different people (one lurker, one current poster) said
so within the space of a couple of days, I finally hooked it up again;
said hello 'how's things?' to everybody (including you which caught you
properly on the hop and made you squirm all ugly-like, IIRC) and gaily
started throwing posts on and starting threads as and when summat came
up I thought someone would find even a tiny bit interesting, to fill
out some of the silences.

Ah. Back to the knitting circle again. Is that too quiet for you?


FFS, there are loads of newsgroups. Why not leave this one for the
discussion of on topic things?


Not everybody is all over Usenet like a rash, as you are - some people
like their online chitchat on and off topic in the one place with
people they feel they have got to know.

But not love - by the way you slag off so many.

I really can't see what all
your squealing is about - no posts in this group are compulsory reading
and, especially as traffic here is almost non-existent, why TF does it
bother you so much? What do you fear?

Perhaps it's because I try and keep to the etiquette of newsgroups. Not
try and take them over like you.


And join the ones for the topics you
obviously prefer to discuss than audio?


Actually, I don't like *any* newgroups; like most of the people who
frequent them, they are superfluous, lifespan-wasting and *creepy* and
'forums' are even creepier. This group is only a silly habit that's
goes back a long way and is all too easy to continue with - probably
because you don't seem to be able to stop replying to my posts?

Pot kettle. You've never ever been able to resist having the last word -
or trying. So I'll keep on putting my oar in just to annoy you.

Trust me, if we had an upstairs and the computer was up there and I had
to trudge up to it to use it, I wouldn't be on it twice in one day!!

Are you that sickly? Sorry, I didn't know. Is it sheltered accommodation
you live in?

(Wiki, IMDB, eBay and Amazon are plenty enough for any sane person..!!
:-)


I could understand you asking an off topic question if you had a high
regard for the opinions of those who post here...


You are quite right in that I have lost my regard for one or two here -
my loss, I'm sure... ;-)

Now, forget all that ****, how about you answer my question and give me
the information I asked for?

What would that be? And I'm certainly not going to put myself out for you.


"While I'm on - you're obviously at a bit of a loose end, why don't you
confirm some figures for me? As you well know I've been posting almost
anything and everything trying to boost the traffic in here and I've had
a quick count-up of my latest 'OT video' thread ('You can fool the
ear...') and I make it 7 (or 8?) people posted a total of 53 times in
that thread, with no less than 12 of them coming from *you*...??"

Only to try and correct your rubbish.


@:-)


What a childish, *childish* little **** you are and and so ****ing
*stupid* - you don't realise you would almost certainly get your own way, in
your *own* little newsgroup, in the end if only you could keep your stupid
mouth shut long enough.

But not you, eh? ;-)

Proof? You will not be able to resist replying to this or any other future
post I might make!

Wake up, clown - it's so damned easy pulling your ****er it's becoming a
*chore*!!

@:-)

(I'm wearing a big, fluffy syrup these days! ;-)







--
*Elephants are the only mammals that can't jump *

Dave Plowman London SW
To e-mail, change noise into sound.

--
*Toilet stolen from police station. Cops have nothing to go on.

Dave Plowman London SW
To e-mail, change noise into sound.

Vinyl Memories From W.H.Smith
 

"Keith G" wrote


Wake up, clown - it's so damned easy pulling your ****er it's becoming a
*chore*!!


Finally!!

Believe it or not, it is only after sending my last post and a ton of
clicking about that I have finally discovered how to *block senders* in this
somewhat strange 'Vista' version of OE!

So, for their specific information, the following are (hopefully) now
blocked in the hope that it will reduce acrimonious traffic he

Plowman
Looser
Lesurf

Let's see if that helps the *hissy fits* here wake up to the fact that the
quickest way to get rid of someone is to ignore them...??

@:-)

Vinyl Memories From W.H.Smith
 

"Keith G" wrote in message


What a childish, *childish* little **** you are and and
so ****ing *stupid* - you don't realise you would almost
certainly get your own way, in your *own* little
newsgroup, in the end if only you could keep your stupid
mouth shut long enough.


....and this is why some of us sigh a breath of relief when Keith again
leaves our presence...

Vinyl Memories From W.H.Smith
 

"Arny Krueger" wrote in message
...
"Keith G" wrote in message


What a childish, *childish* little **** you are and and
so ****ing *stupid* - you don't realise you would almost
certainly get your own way, in your *own* little
newsgroup, in the end if only you could keep your stupid
mouth shut long enough.


...and this is why some of us sigh a breath of relief when Keith again
leaves our presence...



Really?

Say the word, Amy - only say the word! Why do you hesitate?

Actually, you are a foreigner - I'm not sure you qualify, but all the other
whiners bleating about my posts here are either too stupid or just too
damned *egotistical* to simply ignore them!!

Anyway, I hope I have found the solution to all that now with my newly
discovered 'Vista ****ter'!

(Note you are not in it yet! @:-)

Vinyl Memories From W.H.Smith
 

In article ,
Keith G wrote:
What a childish, *childish* little **** you are and and so ****ing
*stupid*

Language, Timothy.

--
*Errors have been made. Others will be blamed.

Dave Plowman London SW
To e-mail, change noise into sound.

Vinyl Memories From W.H.Smith
 

In article ,
Keith G wrote:
Believe it or not, it is only after sending my last post and a ton of
clicking about that I have finally discovered how to *block senders* in
this somewhat strange 'Vista' version of OE!

Pity you ever discovered the send button.

But of course you'll read every post to see what is being said about you.

And it just shows your enormous ego - thinking others care if you read
their posts or not...

--
*I pretend to work. - they pretend to pay me.

Dave Plowman London SW
To e-mail, change noise into sound.

Vinyl Memories From W.H.Smith
 

Keith G wrote:
So, for their specific information, the following are (hopefully) now
blocked in the hope that it will reduce acrimonious traffic he

Plowman
Looser
Lesurf


Can you add me as well?

--
Adrian C