Same old faces, same old faeces.....
 

"Dave Plowman (News)" wrote in message
...
In article ,
Keith G wrote:
Which the group's noisest, self-appointed 'moderator' made in response
to my rematk:

No moderators here, Kitty. If there were, most of your posts wouldn't
appear. Do you know what a moderated group is?

"Not surprising from industry types who hang around in hobbyist
newsgroups, I suppose.""

And yet you won't answer my point about Churches. Not surprising you being
his poodle.




More name-calling - where's the 'give it a rest' squad when you need them?

;-)

Same old faces, same old faeces.....
 

"Dave Plowman (News)" wrote in message
...
In article ,
Just Another Lurker wrote:
Alas, over recent years, it would seem that hi-fi (domestic equipment
and related music) have become (for some) taboo subjects. The mere
mention of music is frowned upon by some in this ng. It would appear
that only the technical are now welcome in this ng and the hi-fi
hobbyist are ignored or held with contempt

I'm one who objects



Who the **** cares what you object to?



to those who *only* want to talk about music here.


Pure bull**** from a very twisted mind and all because it's outside his own,
narrow little Comfort Zone....

Same old faces, same old faeces.....
 

In article ,
Keith G wrote:

"Dave Plowman (News)" wrote in message
...
In article ,
Keith G wrote:
Which the group's noisest, self-appointed 'moderator' made in response
to my rematk:

No moderators here, Kitty.



Let the records show who has started the name-calling - again...

Given the usual tone of your posts, so what. Since it obviously annoys you
so much.

Hint. If you want polite responses stop trying to score points all the
time.



If there were, most of your posts wouldn't
appear. Do you know what a moderated group is?

"Not surprising from industry types who hang around in hobbyist
newsgroups, I suppose.""

And yet you won't answer my point about Churches. Not surprising you
being his poodle.



Oh dear, another of Mr Plowman's hostile and spitty posts - someone must
have touched a nerve..???

:-)

Still no answer to a perfectly reasonable question on a point *you*
thought so important. Typical.

--
*A journey of a thousand sites begins with a single click *

Dave Plowman London SW
To e-mail, change noise into sound.

Same old faces, same old faeces.....
 

In article ,
Keith G wrote:
(Another of Mr Plowman's hostile and spitty potsts - someone must have
touched a nerve..??? :-)

Well that's the third time you've used that expression. Do you think
repeating it so often makes it valid?

--
*Procrastinate now

Dave Plowman London SW
To e-mail, change noise into sound.

Same old faces, same old faeces.....
 

"David Looser" wrote in
message
"Keith G" wrote

'Hifi hobbyists' may well be 'technical', they may also
not be - there is no requirement here AFAIA...??

"HiFi" is technical, so how can a HiFi hobbyist *not* be
technical?

Being technical is not a binary situation, it isn't that you either are or
you are not. There are many shades of gray.

Several of the shades of gray related to being technical are apparent here.

While it is not an absolute rule, generally the more technical and balanced
your education and experience are, the more factual your comments are.

Same old faces, same old faeces.....
 

"Arny Krueger" wrote in message
...
"David Looser" wrote in
message
"Keith G" wrote

'Hifi hobbyists' may well be 'technical', they may also
not be - there is no requirement here AFAIA...??

"HiFi" is technical, so how can a HiFi hobbyist *not* be
technical?

Being technical is not a binary situation, it isn't that you either are or
you are not. There are many shades of gray.

Several of the shades of gray related to being technical are apparent
here.

While it is not an absolute rule, generally the more technical and
balanced your education and experience are, the more factual your comments
are.




What a blatherous way of stating the obvious: some people are more technical
than others; some people know more than others.

Too simple?

Same old faces, same old faeces.....
 

"Dave Plowman (News)" wrote in message
...
In article ,
Keith G wrote:

"Dave Plowman (News)" wrote in message
...
In article ,
Keith G wrote:
Which the group's noisest, self-appointed 'moderator' made in response
to my rematk:

No moderators here, Kitty.



Let the records show who has started the name-calling - again...

Given the usual tone of your posts, so what. Since it obviously annoys you
so much.



I'm sorry the tone of my posts obviously annoys you so much.

(Or am I...?? ;-))





Hint. If you want polite responses stop trying to score points all the
time.



If there were, most of your posts wouldn't
appear. Do you know what a moderated group is?

"Not surprising from industry types who hang around in hobbyist
newsgroups, I suppose.""

And yet you won't answer my point about Churches. Not surprising you
being his poodle.



Oh dear, another of Mr Plowman's hostile and spitty posts - someone must
have touched a nerve..???

:-)

Still no answer to a perfectly reasonable question on a point *you*
thought so important. Typical.


*A journey of a thousand sites begins with a single click *

Dave Plowman London SW
To e-mail, change noise into sound.

Same old faces, same old faeces.....
 

"Dave Plowman (News)" wrote in message
...
In article ,
Keith G wrote:
(Another of Mr Plowman's hostile and spitty potsts - someone must have
touched a nerve..??? :-)

Well that's the third time you've used that expression. Do you think
repeating it so often makes it valid?



I'm sorry the tone of my posts obviously annoys you so much.

(Or am I...?? ;-))




*Procrastinate now

Dave Plowman London SW
To e-mail, change noise into sound.

Same old faces, same old faeces.....
 

"Keith G" wrote in message


What a blatherous way of stating the obvious: some people
are more technical than others; some people know more
than others.

Too simple?

Apparently too simple for you to actually act on, Keith.

Same old faces, same old faeces.....
 

"Arny Krueger" wrote in message
...
"Keith G" wrote in message


What a blatherous way of stating the obvious: some people
are more technical than others; some people know more
than others.

Too simple?

Apparently too simple for you to actually act on, Keith.


Absolutely no clue what that means Arny - care to explain? But I'm a bit
busy to act on anything atm - I'm halfway through rejetting a pair of carbs
on a Triumph Thruxton 900 right now.

(Sorry, it can't be audio all the time with me and my hifi kit doesn't need
constant fettling! ;-)