A Audio, hi-fi and car audio  forum. Audio Banter

Go Back   Home » Audio Banter forum » UK Audio Newsgroups » uk.rec.audio (General Audio and Hi-Fi)
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

uk.rec.audio (General Audio and Hi-Fi) (uk.rec.audio) Discussion and exchange of hi-fi audio equipment.

Hi-end audio hardware aesthetics?



 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old October 16th 10, 10:44 AM posted to rec.audio.opinion,uk.rec.audio
Geoff Mackenzie
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 84
Default Hi-end audio hardware aesthetics?



"Boon" wrote in message
...
On Oct 15, 4:52 pm, ScottW wrote:
On Oct 15, 2:40 pm, Boon wrote:

On Oct 15, 4:17 pm, "Fed Up Lurker"
wrote:


Did you really have them playing in your system? If you did then you
would've taken a few pictures of yourself posing beside them. upload
the pix to something like Flickr, I only suggest this so as to cast
aside
any doubts some may have....


Or, you could look at my blog (the one you said that you read, heh
heh) and see the evidence.


I Live in Austria, I'll be having a word with one or two peeps...


When you're proven wrong, will you be a man about it and admit it?


I noticed Boon refuses to address the salient points made about their
anemic bass response.


That's because I don't hear an anemic bass response. The last time I
heard an anemic bass response was when you tried to set your Quad ESLs
on rickety wooden footstools. THAT was anemic.

I'm sure they would benefit greatly from even a modest subwoofer, but
sub integration is beyond Boons setup knowledge.


Except for the fact that I've reviewed subwoofers and had the
manufacturers stop by to determine if I had set them up properly...and
I had. The proof is in print.

---personal abuse snipped----

For many years I used Quad ESL63s with the excellent REL sub. Did you
"review" this combination? Where can I find the "proof in print"?

GMacK

  #2 (permalink)  
Old October 16th 10, 02:59 PM posted to rec.audio.opinion,uk.rec.audio
Boon
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 27
Default Hi-end audio hardware aesthetics?

On Oct 16, 5:44*am, "Geoff Mackenzie" wrote:
"Boon" wrote in message

...



On Oct 15, 4:52 pm, ScottW wrote:
On Oct 15, 2:40 pm, Boon wrote:


On Oct 15, 4:17 pm, "Fed Up Lurker"
wrote:


Did you really have them playing in your system? If you did then you
would've taken a few pictures of yourself posing beside them. upload
the pix to something like Flickr, I only suggest this so as to cast
aside
any doubts some may have....


Or, you could look at my blog (the one you said that you read, heh
heh) and see the evidence.


I Live in Austria, I'll be having a word with one or two peeps...


When you're proven wrong, will you be a man about it and admit it?


*I noticed Boon refuses to address the salient points made about their
anemic bass response.


That's because I don't hear an anemic bass response. The last time I
heard an anemic bass response was when you tried to set your Quad ESLs
on rickety wooden footstools. THAT was anemic.


*I'm sure they would benefit greatly from even a modest subwoofer, but
sub integration is beyond Boons setup knowledge.


Except for the fact that I've reviewed subwoofers and had the
manufacturers stop by to determine if I had set them up properly...and
I had. The proof is in print.


---personal abuse snipped----

For many years I used Quad ESL63s with the excellent REL sub. *Did you
"review" this combination? *


No, I did not.

Where can I find the "proof in print"?

Of something I didn't do? Hmmm.

 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT. The time now is 04:30 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.SEO by vBSEO 3.0.0
Copyright ©2004-2025 Audio Banter.
The comments are property of their posters.