1 of 2 'unpostables!
 

"Arny Krueger" wrote in message
...
"Keith G" wrote in message


If Arny has experience of the *professional audio* world
it shouldn't be to hard to list it.

Keith if you weren't suffering from memory loss, you'd know better.

(Unpaid, volunteer work doesn't count.)

Its the quality of work that makes it professional, not the size of the
cash renumeration.

The two are closely linked. In recording, people who
turn out good work are well paid for doing so.

I recall a post on RAO where you stated that
you were personally, from your own pocket
subsidising you church recordings, and that
because the church had no money you yourself
had paid for the recording equipment.

Your role as volunteer and benefactor is highly
commendable.

Iain

1 of 2 'unpostables!
 

"Iain Churches" wrote in message
...

"Arny Krueger" wrote in message
...
"Keith G" wrote in message


If Arny has experience of the *professional audio* world
it shouldn't be to hard to list it.

Keith if you weren't suffering from memory loss, you'd know better.

(Unpaid, volunteer work doesn't count.)

Its the quality of work that makes it professional, not the size of the
cash renumeration.

The two are closely linked. In recording, people who
turn out good work are well paid for doing so.

I recall a post on RAO where you stated that
you were personally, from your own pocket
subsidising you church recordings, and that
because the church had no money you yourself
had paid for the recording equipment.


S'funny, I thought money from 'recording work' paid his property taxes?

1 of 2 'unpostables!
 

"Iain Churches" wrote in message

"Arny Krueger" wrote in message
...
"Keith G" wrote in message


If Arny has experience of the *professional audio* world
it shouldn't be to hard to list it.

Keith if you weren't suffering from memory loss, you'd
know better.
(Unpaid, volunteer work doesn't count.)

Its the quality of work that makes it professional, not
the size of the cash renumeration.

The two are closely linked. In recording, people who
turn out good work are well paid for doing so.

Unless they are working for a charitable organization as a work of charity.

Notice how Iain goes blank when one mentions charity?

I recall a post on RAO where you stated that
you were personally, from your own pocket
subsidising you church recordings,

The church has plenty of money, but they also have rather serious leadership
problems.

and that because the church had no money you yourself
had paid for the recording equipment.

That situation has rectified itself. But you have most of the details wrong.

Your role as volunteer and benefactor is highly
commendable.

You often make it sound like malfeasance on my part.

1 of 2 'unpostables!
 

"Keith G" wrote in message

"Iain Churches" wrote in message
...

"Arny Krueger" wrote in message
...
"Keith G" wrote in message


If Arny has experience of the *professional audio*
world it shouldn't be to hard to list it.

Keith if you weren't suffering from memory loss, you'd
know better.
(Unpaid, volunteer work doesn't count.)

Its the quality of work that makes it professional, not
the size of the cash renumeration.

The two are closely linked. In recording, people who
turn out good work are well paid for doing so.

I recall a post on RAO where you stated that
you were personally, from your own pocket
subsidising you church recordings, and that
because the church had no money you yourself
had paid for the recording equipment.


S'funny, I thought money from 'recording work' paid his
property taxes?

And of course Keith, your rather limited little mind can't conceive of how
both statements could easily be true.

For the 456th time:

I do recording work for hire and I do recording and live sound for charity.


At this time I am supplied with reasonable tools and supplies in both cases,
but that has not always been the case.

The recording work for hire has always included entirely adequate equipment
and supplies as part of the deal. The equipment was chosen to meet my
standards, and some of it duplicates equipment that I also own for myself.

1 of 2 'unpostables!
 

"Jim Lesurf" wrote in message

In article
, Don
Pearce wrote:
On Mon, 7 Mar 2011 08:28:54 -0500, "Arny Krueger"
wrote:


There's no doubt that there were birth defects among
the Vietnamese. Attribution is tougher. Correlation is
not causuality.

I'm talking about the startling increase in birth
defects among the children of pilots who had returned
home.

Documented facts?

I'm certainly no historian. So I'm curious to know if his
'blind spot' (typified by his wordings) about these
matters is due to the US media and history books simply
omitting such things as uncomfortable.

I think you first need to ensure that the blind spot even exists.

Google returns an estimate of almost a million documents about "agent orange
effects", for example.

Looks like a pretty badly done cover-up, if there was one! ;-)

1 of 2 'unpostables!
 

"Arny Krueger" wrote in message
...
"Keith G" wrote in message

"Iain Churches" wrote in message
...

"Arny Krueger" wrote in message
...
"Keith G" wrote in message


If Arny has experience of the *professional audio*
world it shouldn't be to hard to list it.

Keith if you weren't suffering from memory loss, you'd
know better.
(Unpaid, volunteer work doesn't count.)

Its the quality of work that makes it professional, not
the size of the cash renumeration.

The two are closely linked. In recording, people who
turn out good work are well paid for doing so.

I recall a post on RAO where you stated that
you were personally, from your own pocket
subsidising you church recordings, and that
because the church had no money you yourself
had paid for the recording equipment.


S'funny, I thought money from 'recording work' paid his
property taxes?

And of course Keith, your rather limited little mind can't conceive of how
both statements could easily be true.


Posting conflicting statements on different newsgroups seem to be the cause
of the problem.



For the 456th time:

I do recording work for hire and I do recording and live sound for
charity.


OK. Get much paid work?

1 of 2 'unpostables!
 

"Keith G" wrote in message

"Arny Krueger" wrote in message
...
"Keith G" wrote in message

"Iain Churches" wrote in message
...

"Arny Krueger" wrote in message
...
"Keith G" wrote in message


If Arny has experience of the *professional audio*
world it shouldn't be to hard to list it.

Keith if you weren't suffering from memory loss, you'd
know better.
(Unpaid, volunteer work doesn't count.)

Its the quality of work that makes it professional,
not the size of the cash renumeration.

The two are closely linked. In recording, people who
turn out good work are well paid for doing so.

I recall a post on RAO where you stated that
you were personally, from your own pocket
subsidising you church recordings, and that
because the church had no money you yourself
had paid for the recording equipment.

S'funny, I thought money from 'recording work' paid his
property taxes?

Those are significant expenses in this part of the world. My property taxes
and house payments (exclusive of taxes) are similar and large.


And of course Keith, your rather limited little mind
can't conceive of how both statements could easily be
true.

Posting conflicting statements on different newsgroups
seem to be the cause of the problem.

Your probable problem Keith would be a lack of time sense. Just because I
said one thing in 1995 doesn't mean that I'm contradicting myself when I say
something different in 2011. ;-)

For the 456th time:

I do recording work for hire and I do recording and live
sound for charity.

OK. Get much paid work?

Yes, and in increasing amounts.

1 of 2 'unpostables!
 

"Arny Krueger" wrote in message
...
"Keith G" wrote in message

"Arny Krueger" wrote in message
...
"Keith G" wrote in message

"Iain Churches" wrote in message
...

"Arny Krueger" wrote in message
...
"Keith G" wrote in message


If Arny has experience of the *professional audio*
world it shouldn't be to hard to list it.

Keith if you weren't suffering from memory loss, you'd
know better.
(Unpaid, volunteer work doesn't count.)

Its the quality of work that makes it professional,
not the size of the cash renumeration.

The two are closely linked. In recording, people who
turn out good work are well paid for doing so.

I recall a post on RAO where you stated that
you were personally, from your own pocket
subsidising you church recordings, and that
because the church had no money you yourself
had paid for the recording equipment.

S'funny, I thought money from 'recording work' paid his
property taxes?

Those are significant expenses in this part of the world. My property
taxes and house payments (exclusive of taxes) are similar and large.


And of course Keith, your rather limited little mind
can't conceive of how both statements could easily be
true.

Posting conflicting statements on different newsgroups
seem to be the cause of the problem.

Your probable problem Keith would be a lack of time sense. Just because I
said one thing in 1995 doesn't mean that I'm contradicting myself when I
say something different in 2011. ;-)


Huh?



For the 456th time:

I do recording work for hire and I do recording and live
sound for charity.

OK. Get much paid work?

Yes, and in increasing amounts.


No you don't.

1 of 2 'unpostables!
 

"Keith G" wrote in message

"Arny Krueger" wrote in message
...
"Keith G" wrote in message

"Arny Krueger" wrote in message
...
"Keith G" wrote in message

"Iain Churches" wrote in message
...

"Arny Krueger" wrote in message
...
"Keith G" wrote in message


If Arny has experience of the *professional audio*
world it shouldn't be to hard to list it.

Keith if you weren't suffering from memory loss,
you'd know better.
(Unpaid, volunteer work doesn't count.)

Its the quality of work that makes it professional,
not the size of the cash renumeration.

The two are closely linked. In recording, people who
turn out good work are well paid for doing so.

I recall a post on RAO where you stated that
you were personally, from your own pocket
subsidising you church recordings, and that
because the church had no money you yourself
had paid for the recording equipment.

S'funny, I thought money from 'recording work' paid
his property taxes?

Those are significant expenses in this part of the
world. My property taxes and house payments (exclusive
of taxes) are similar and large.
And of course Keith, your rather limited little mind
can't conceive of how both statements could easily be
true.

Posting conflicting statements on different newsgroups
seem to be the cause of the problem.

Your probable problem Keith would be a lack of time
sense. Just because I said one thing in 1995 doesn't
mean that I'm contradicting myself when I say something
different in 2011. ;-)


Huh?



For the 456th time:

I do recording work for hire and I do recording and
live sound for charity.

OK. Get much paid work?

Yes, and in increasing amounts.


No you don't.

Delusions of omniscience noted.

1 of 2 'unpostables!
 

"Arny Krueger" wrote in message
...
"Keith G" wrote in message

"Arny Krueger" wrote in message
...
"Keith G" wrote in message

"Arny Krueger" wrote in message
...
"Keith G" wrote in message

"Iain Churches" wrote in message
...

"Arny Krueger" wrote in message
...
"Keith G" wrote in message


If Arny has experience of the *professional audio*
world it shouldn't be to hard to list it.

Keith if you weren't suffering from memory loss,
you'd know better.
(Unpaid, volunteer work doesn't count.)

Its the quality of work that makes it professional,
not the size of the cash renumeration.

The two are closely linked. In recording, people who
turn out good work are well paid for doing so.

I recall a post on RAO where you stated that
you were personally, from your own pocket
subsidising you church recordings, and that
because the church had no money you yourself
had paid for the recording equipment.

S'funny, I thought money from 'recording work' paid
his property taxes?

Those are significant expenses in this part of the
world. My property taxes and house payments (exclusive
of taxes) are similar and large.
And of course Keith, your rather limited little mind
can't conceive of how both statements could easily be
true.

Posting conflicting statements on different newsgroups
seem to be the cause of the problem.

Your probable problem Keith would be a lack of time
sense. Just because I said one thing in 1995 doesn't
mean that I'm contradicting myself when I say something
different in 2011. ;-)


Huh?



For the 456th time:

I do recording work for hire and I do recording and
live sound for charity.

OK. Get much paid work?

Yes, and in increasing amounts.


No you don't.

Delusions of omniscience noted.


Maybe, but I'm not *really* wrong am I..? ;-)