A Audio, hi-fi and car audio  forum. Audio Banter

Go Back   Home » Audio Banter forum » UK Audio Newsgroups » uk.rec.audio (General Audio and Hi-Fi)
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

uk.rec.audio (General Audio and Hi-Fi) (uk.rec.audio) Discussion and exchange of hi-fi audio equipment.

Digitising Vinyls (OT for uk.tech.digital-tv)



 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old December 24th 11, 02:01 PM posted to uk.rec.audio,uk.tech.digital-tv
Java Jive
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 106
Default Digitising Vinyls - Strange Problem (OT for uk.tech.digital-tv)

On Sat, 24 Dec 2011 11:49:15 +0000 (GMT), charles
wrote:

In article ,
Wolfgang Schwanke wrote:

[Snip]

You digitised your entire record collection? IMO it's not economical to
digitise vinyl in DIY as long as the same albums are available on CD
commercially. You'll spend 2 hours minimum recording, post processing
and burning the tracks of a single album, and that is not counting the
time for scanning the artwork. Unless you value or own free time very
low, just buying the same album on CD is much more cost effective.


That is true, but is unhelpful when the vast majority of LPs that I
have left were never published on CD, or if they were, only briefly
and have since been deleted.* Most of those available on CD I've
already replaced.

It might be more cost effective to buy CDs, but doing it yourself doesn't
involve financial outlay. I have 300+ LPs in the loft. To replace them
with CD would cost a lot of money which, since I live on a pension, isn't a
practical proposition. My time only costs me if by digitising a CD I have
to pay someone else to do another job that I could do myself. And in any
case, I can do other things when the LP is playing, I don't need to monitor
it all the time.


Exactly. As I've already stated up thread, now I certainly wouldn't
be throwing good money after a not so good medium like vinyl by, say,
buying a vinyl washer, but I already had it from some years ago.

* Much of the entire history of UK folk music from about the late '60s
through the '70s and '80s to the early '90s was only ever published on
LP, or perhaps only briefly republished on CD, so the only way to get
copies of these now is either from a second-hand LP or by downloading
someone else's digitisation of the CD - given the illegality, and
perhaps more importantly usually the poor bitrates, of the latter, the
former might be considered preferable, certainly so if you already
happen to own the LP.

Small labels - like Leader, Highway, Rubber - gradually went bust,
and were bought up by other concerns, many of them by one particularly
controversial one called Celtic Music. This label was and may very
well still be subject to a Musicians' Union 'notice' (being only ever
an amateur, I'm not a member so I can't link to it), concerning its,
how shall I state this, behaviour that might be considered 'unfair' or
'unfriendly' to the musician? This behaviour has also been much
discussed, often very emotively, in public forums such as
www.mudcat.org.

The treatment of Nic Jones has been the subject of the most heated
controversy. While driving home from a gig in the '80s, Nic had an
accident that effectively ended his musical carreer - hand and brain
damage. Much of his most important output til then had been recorded
for his friend Bill Leader's eponymous label. I'm not certain of the
precise history of the label, but I think Bill died sometime after
Nic's accident, and the label went bust around the same time. What is
not in dispute, about the only thing that isn't, is that CM 'claim' to
own the rights of all the Leader recordings, including Nic's. None of
these recordings have ever been properly published in a legally
transparent way on CD accountable to MCPS ...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MCPS-PRS_Alliance
.... but instead there are whispers of CD-R recordings where no
royalties need to be paid to the artist.

All I know for certain is:

:-) An early and particularly fine Barbara Dickson album "From the
Beggar's Mantle" that I bought apparently from CM turned out, to my
relief, to be a pukka CD from Decca.

:-( I contacted Nic's wife Julia concerning one of Nic's early
albums of which I'd seen a CD for sale somewhere, asking whether, if I
bought it, Nic would get any royalties, and when she answered no, I
didn't buy the album, much as I wanted it.

:-) Nic's last and best album, Pengun Eggs, was fortunately
published on Topic, and is thus still available even on CD:
http://www.nicjones.net/shop?shopPag...gs_n ic_jones

But quite apart from the CM horror story, normal commercial pressures
have killed off a lot of original recordings. This is a problem not
just for folk music, but also for other minority genres such as Music
Hall.

For example, my collection includedes the following albums, AFAIAA
none of which have ever been available on CD, and all of which are so
good that I consider myself lucky to have them ...

Bandoggs: (eponymous album)
Dab Hand: High Rock And Low Glen
Cilla Fisher: Songs Of The Fishing
Dubliners: Finnegan Wakes
Dubliners: Live At The Royal Albert Hall
Eddie Walker: Red Shoes On My Feet
Ewan MacColl & Peggy Seeger: World Of
Filarfolket: Live!
Galliards: Scottish Choice
Gerry Hallom: A Run A Minute
Gerry Hallom: Travellin' Down The Castlereagh
House Band: (eponymous album)
Nic Jones: Noah's Ark Trap

.... while the rest of the collection contain countless individual
tracks, usually about three or four per album, that I didn't want to
lose, as well as some 'family' albums of my mother's which other
members of my family have occasionally expressed an interest in
hearing again.
--
================================================== =======
Please always reply to ng as the email in this post's
header does not exist. Or use a contact address at:
http://www.macfh.co.uk/JavaJive/JavaJive.html
http://www.macfh.co.uk/Macfarlane/Macfarlane.html
  #2 (permalink)  
Old January 6th 12, 10:46 AM posted to uk.rec.audio,uk.tech.digital-tv
[email protected]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 7
Default Digitising Vinyls - Strange Problem (OT for uk.tech.digital-tv)

On Dec 24 2011, 3:01*pm, Java Jive wrote:
On Sat, 24 Dec 2011 11:49:15 +0000 (GMT), charles

wrote:
In article ,
* *Wolfgang Schwanke wrote:


[Snip]


You digitised your entire record collection? IMO it's not economical to
digitise vinyl in DIY as long as the same albums are available on CD
commercially. You'll spend 2 hours minimum recording, post processing
and burning the tracks of a single album, and that is not counting the
time for scanning the artwork. Unless you value or own free time very
low, just buying the same album on CD is much more cost effective.


That is true, but is unhelpful when the vast majority of LPs that I
have left were never published on CD, or if they were, only briefly
and have since been deleted.* *Most of those available on CD I've
already replaced.

It might be more cost effective to buy CDs, but doing it yourself doesn't
involve financial outlay. *I have 300+ LPs in the loft. *To replace them
with CD would cost a lot of money which, since I live on a pension, isn't a
practical proposition. *My time only costs me if by digitising a CD I have
to pay someone else to do another job that I could do myself. *And in any
case, I can do other things when the LP is playing, I don't need to monitor
it all the time.


Exactly. *As I've already stated up thread, now I certainly wouldn't
be throwing good money after a not so good medium like vinyl by, say,
buying a vinyl washer, but I already had it from some years ago.

* Much of the entire history of UK folk music from about the late '60s
through the '70s and '80s to the early '90s was only ever published on
LP, or perhaps only briefly republished on CD, so the only way to get
copies of these now is either from a second-hand LP or by downloading
someone else's digitisation of the CD *- *given the illegality, and
perhaps more importantly usually the poor bitrates, of the latter, the
former might be considered preferable, certainly so if you already
happen to own the LP.

Small labels *- *like Leader, Highway, Rubber *- *gradually went bust,
and were bought up by other concerns, many of them by one particularly
controversial one called Celtic Music. *This label was and may very
well still be subject to a Musicians' Union 'notice' (being only ever
an amateur, I'm not a member so I can't link to it), concerning its,
how shall I state this, behaviour that might be considered 'unfair' or
'unfriendly' to the musician? *This behaviour has also been much
discussed, often very emotively, in public forums such aswww.mudcat.org.

The treatment of Nic Jones has been the subject of the most heated
controversy. *While driving home from a gig in the '80s, Nic had an
accident that effectively ended his musical carreer *- *hand and brain
damage. *Much of his most important output til then had been recorded
for his friend Bill Leader's eponymous label. *I'm not certain of the
precise history of the label, but I think Bill died sometime after
Nic's accident, and the label went bust around the same time. *What is
not in dispute, about the only thing that isn't, is that CM 'claim' to
own the rights of all the Leader recordings, including Nic's. *None of
these recordings have ever been properly published in a legally
transparent way on CD accountable to MCPS ...http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MCPS-PRS_Alliance
... but instead there are whispers of CD-R recordings where no
royalties need to be paid to the artist.

All I know for certain is:

*:-) * *An early and particularly fine Barbara Dickson album "From the
Beggar's Mantle" that I bought apparently from CM turned out, to my
relief, to be a pukka CD from Decca.

*:-( * *I contacted Nic's wife Julia concerning one of Nic's early
albums of which I'd seen a CD for sale somewhere, asking whether, if I
bought it, Nic would get any royalties, and when she answered no, I
didn't buy the album, much as I wanted it.

*:-) * *Nic's last and best album, Pengun Eggs, was fortunately
published on Topic, and is thus still available even on CD:http://www.nicjones.net/shop?shopPag...ct=1_penguin_e...

But quite apart from the CM horror story, normal commercial pressures
have killed off a lot of original recordings. *This is a problem not
just for folk music, but also for other minority genres such as Music
Hall.

For example, my collection includedes the following albums, AFAIAA
none of which have ever been available on CD, and all of which are so
good that I consider myself lucky to have them ...

Bandoggs: * * * * * * * (eponymous album)
Dab Hand: * * * * * * * High Rock And Low Glen
Cilla Fisher: * * * * * Songs Of The Fishing
Dubliners: * * * * * * *Finnegan Wakes
Dubliners: * * * * * * *Live At The Royal Albert Hall
Eddie Walker: * Red Shoes On My Feet
Ewan MacColl & Peggy Seeger: * * * *World Of
Filarfolket: * * * * * *Live!
Galliards: * * * * * * *Scottish Choice
Gerry Hallom: * A Run A Minute
Gerry Hallom: * Travellin' Down The Castlereagh
House Band: * * (eponymous album)
Nic Jones: * * * * * * *Noah's Ark Trap

... while the rest of the collection contain countless individual
tracks, usually about three or four per album, that I didn't want to
lose, as well as some 'family' albums of my mother's which other
members of my family have occasionally expressed an interest in
hearing again.


When we had a 50 year sound recording copyright term, you could at
least hope that any recordings from your youth, hoarded by the record
labels (and in some cases, artists) would be re-released (or you could
re-release them yourself) at some point during your lifetime.

Now Sir Cliff and the record companies have successfully lobbied to
increase this to 70 years, and will doubtless increase it to 95 years
next time The Beatles catalogue looks set to fall into the public
domain, you're stuffed. Or at least, those who don't own copies of the
original vinyl and wish to abide by the law are stuffed. Not that you
can even legally copy your own vinyl for your own use yet.


It's not economics that keeps niche recordings off CD (or Spotify,
or ...). It's the arrogance of big record companies who simply can't
be bothered to do it. Talk to any number of small recording companies
who have _wanted_ to license the rights + masters from big companies
at commercial rates that would have delivered a small profit to both,
and what you find is that big recording companies who hold these
rights simply can't be bothered to put in the small effort to allow
others to monetise them.

A 25 year sound copyright term would have been a better move IMO.
Similar cuts for most other copyright terms would give a great boost
to most creative industries, education, on-line access etc.

Cheers,
David.
  #3 (permalink)  
Old January 6th 12, 02:52 PM posted to uk.rec.audio,uk.tech.digital-tv
Jim Lesurf[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,668
Default Digitising Vinyls - Strange Problem (OT for uk.tech.digital-tv)

In article
,
wrote:



Now Sir Cliff and the record companies have successfully lobbied to
increase this to 70 years, and will doubtless increase it to 95 years
next time The Beatles catalogue looks set to fall into the public
domain, you're stuffed. Or at least, those who don't own copies of the
original vinyl and wish to abide by the law are stuffed. Not that you
can even legally copy your own vinyl for your own use yet.



It's not economics that keeps niche recordings off CD (or Spotify, or
...). It's the arrogance of big record companies who simply can't be
bothered to do it.


They also want to avoid having too many 'similar' (in terms of their
marketing view) items available at a time. So they bury some artists and
versions because they can then just press more copies of the limited range
they've decided to provide. Easier on stock control, etc, from their POV to
limit the choice.

The result is unfair to many artists by causing them to go unheard, and
maybe become forgotten. So losing out to suit the companies.

I know the companies argued that extending copyright would enable the
'little performers' to get more income. But the reality is that many were
paid a lump sum and so actually get nowt. The damage to them is their
buried reputation and the missed chance to become better known and make
their newer work sell.

Talk to any number of small recording companies who
have _wanted_ to license the rights + masters from big companies at
commercial rates that would have delivered a small profit to both, and
what you find is that big recording companies who hold these rights
simply can't be bothered to put in the small effort to allow others to
monetise them.


I can echo this from talking to some of the people I've known who have run
small specialist classical labels.

A 25 year sound copyright term would have been a better move IMO.
Similar cuts for most other copyright terms would give a great boost to
most creative industries, education, on-line access etc.


I agree. But money (i.e. big companies) talks so far as politicians are
concerned.

And look out for 'watermarking' of BD discs as well!

Slainte,

Jim

--
Please use the address on the audiomisc page if you wish to email me.
Electronics
http://www.st-and.ac.uk/~www_pa/Scot...o/electron.htm
Armstrong Audio http://www.audiomisc.co.uk/Armstrong/armstrong.html
Audio Misc http://www.audiomisc.co.uk/index.html

 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT. The time now is 01:57 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.SEO by vBSEO 3.0.0
Copyright ©2004-2025 Audio Banter.
The comments are property of their posters.