A Audio, hi-fi and car audio  forum. Audio Banter

Go Back   Home » Audio Banter forum » UK Audio Newsgroups » uk.rec.audio (General Audio and Hi-Fi)
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

uk.rec.audio (General Audio and Hi-Fi) (uk.rec.audio) Discussion and exchange of hi-fi audio equipment.

PC sound hardware need



 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #9 (permalink)  
Old February 26th 18, 03:52 PM posted to uk.rec.audio
Jim Lesurf[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,668
Default PC sound hardware need

In article , Bob Latham
wrote:


Jim, I remember you did some tests on one these devices and wrote it up
some time ago. Was the one you tested the 2nd generation one with 192/24
?


IIRC The Focusrite 2i2 I tested maxes at 96k/24 bit. If there is a '2nd
generation' 2i2 then I didn't have that so can't comment on it.

I have tested other devices that will capture 192k/24, but note that -
unsurprisingly - the cost rises!

http://www.audiomisc.co.uk/HFN/ADC/USBrecording.html

The above shows the results I got from the types I suspect most people will
use, inc. the 2i2 which I thought the best of the bunch. I regard these as
general consumer/musician grade. They can work nicely in simple situations
if used with care

http://www.audiomisc.co.uk/HFN/ADC/HighQualityADCs.html

Shows the more expensive ADCs I tested. Of these I preferred the Benchmark
ADC1. This will record at 192k/24, but its USB interface is limited to
96k/24 because they made it USB Audio Class 1 compliant. It is aimed at
studio use where at the time Windows required a driver for Class 2. However
I think the later Benchmark models are now switchable Class 1/2 and thus
can do 192k/24 via USB. But I'm happy with 96k/24 as all I'm doing is
making transfers from old LPs, tapes, etc. [1]

Frankly, I thought the performance of the benchmark in terms of noise, THD,
etc, are its key advantages. I doubt anyone outside of a pro studio in very
special cases will actually need 192k/24. Most mics, etc, won't produce
anything that needs it.

The Benchmark ADCs allow the user to have *three* digital outputs - via
different interfaces *and rates* in parallel. So you can capture to a
backup CD, USB, and a recorder that can take 192k, all at the same time. It
also have very precise level controls and a useful set of indicators.
Studio grade. But costs much more that something like the 2i2. So if you
want good kit I'd say look at the Benchmark range.


Is there a means of using a better power supply or isn't that necessary.


I did find that the 2i2 and other USB powered interfaces could pick up
rubbish from the USB power line. Use with a battery laptop or a well chosen
mains-powered external USB hub may thus reduce this. The challenge is then
to find a good hub and its PSU. Alas, this is a matter of experiment as the
makers aren't likely to specify this.

Jim

[1] FWIW For a good DAC I'd recommend the Benchmark DAC3 range. Again,
studio / pro grade results, but costs. USB Class 1/2, goes to 192k/24.
Unlike some alternatives allows a good margin for intersample 'overs'.
Handy for clipped material.

--
Please use the address on the audiomisc page if you wish to email me.
Electronics https://www.st-andrews.ac.uk/~www_pa...o/electron.htm
biog http://jcgl.orpheusweb.co.uk/history/ups_and_downs.html
Audio Misc http://www.audiomisc.co.uk/index.html

 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT. The time now is 09:45 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.SEO by vBSEO 3.0.0
Copyright ©2004-2025 Audio Banter.
The comments are property of their posters.