![]() |
Vinyl 'bitrates'
"Dave Plowman (News)" wrote in message
In article , Arny Krueger wrote: The market is now full of digital recordings that could never be played as LPs without very audible remastering. Nothing really new there then - despite what some would have you believe. ;-) Very few analogue master tapes ever went 'straight' to vinyl either. Agreed - mastering vinyl was often about trying to squeeze 5 pounds of sound into a 3 pound vinyl bag. |
Vinyl 'bitrates'
"Jim Lesurf" wrote in message ... In article , Trevor Wilson wrote: "Tat Chan" wrote in message ... **16/44 digital can't even reproduce a decent 5kHz square wave. Such a feat is a doddle for a good vinyl system. Do you think you can hear the difference between a 5kHz square wave and a 5kHz sine wave? Hint: You probably can. What definition of 'decent' are you using here? Just been looking at some reviews that show 1kHz squarewaves and these show all sorts of ringing, rounding, droop, etc. Some of which is reported as cutter produced. **The square waves from my CBS test disk are excellent (when played on the right equipment). Far better than any CD player I've tested (at 5kHz). Vinyl only has (at best) 70 - 78 dB of dynamic range, which equates to 12 - 13 bits resolution, and I am sure vinyl is bandwidth limited as well (cuts off at 16kHz?). **Nope. In fact, a good vinyl recording can go well past 50kHz. The mighty Dynavector 10D-II can operate to 60kHz. The square wave performance of this very fine cartridge is exemplary. At what level, and at what distortion? I'd also wonder what the cut squarewave might look like after a few dozen playings... I don't have info on the 10D/II to hand, but I'm looking at squarewaves for the 20A/II and DV100R. No idea how similar these are, but the results do show a wide bandwidth, albeit with an overshoot and ultrasonic ringing. Not clear how much of this is due to the cutter or a matching resonance with the preamp, though. **Sorry Jim. Brain fart. I meant a Dynavector 17D-II. Isn't the extra "frequency content" associated with vinyl a byproduct of the mechanical replay system? **In poor systems, yes. In good systems, no. Depends what you mean. The dynavectors I just mentioned seem to have THDs similar to most others. i.e. order of 1% around 0dB/1kHz and rising with both frequency and amplitude, as well as worse as you approach the inner groove. Hence I would expect them to produce some ultrasonic components due to nonlinearity. (This is one reason we have to treat squarewave tests with care as the distortion may be making the shape look 'sharper' than a linear response sweep would confirm if filtered to remove distortion products. My experience is that these sorts of things in cartdidges are subject to the same sort of 'pass the parcel' tweaking as the distortion, etc, in FM receivers. You can make some measures look nicer by allowing others to degrade, or by choosing specific circumstances with care.) **All good points. I'll dig out some 'scope shots for you. -- Trevor Wilson www.rageaudio.com.au |
All times are GMT. The time now is 04:49 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.0.0
Copyright ©2004-2006 AudioBanter.co.uk