![]() |
Mains filters
"Don Pearce" wrote in message ... On Thu, 16 Mar 2006 09:10:30 +0000, Glenn Richards wrote: Don Pearce wrote: I ask a serious question, expecting some sensible responses, and instead all I get are sarcastic comments. No, you were trolling. No, I was asking a serious question. As reducing the noise floor (by whatever means) improves dynamics. And this I have tested, I've recently been involved in cleaning up some recordings made about 25 years ago on analogue equipment. This process involves re-EQ followed by digital noise reduction, and the results before and after applying the noise reduction are nothing short of dramatic. Cleaning up recordings most certainly does *not* involve eq. That would be changing recordings. By "cleaning up" I was referring specifically to applying digital noise reduction. The re-EQ was mentioned simply for completeness, as the recordings were a bit bass-shy and lacking in sparkle. So a touch of smiley EQ solves that, followed by noise reduction. It's rather vital that you EQ before NR though, otherwise the re-EQ boosts bits that the NR has cut, leading to some interesting pumping effects... Read above - you can filter the mains til you turn blue and you won't change your noise floor by even a milli dB. On an average setup in an average domestic residence I'm sure that's the case. Unfortunately I have a dozen or so PCs, all with switching power supplies, sat in the next room, spewing RF onto the ring main. Which in theory could be affecting the sound... at least in theory. Turn your amplifier on, with no music playing and listen. Leave the volume control in the normal listening position and sit in your listening chair. What can you hear? Anything? Of course not. And what little hiss there is comes from the front end of the amplifier. None of it comes from the mains. You can't hear much above 20kHz. But signals at frequencies above this will affect what you do hear, harmonics, interaction etc. Why do you think there's been so much work done on DVD-A, SACD etc, using sample rates of 96kHz or even 192kHz, rather than 44.1? Good old Russ Andrews - he has successfully conned £250 out of you. Read my earlier postings. Currently I'm just using a standard IEC cable, running into a surge protected (not even an RFI filtered) 4-way strip. Surge protected for obvious reasons... I don't want a rogue power spike frying 2 grand's worth of kit. Now wise up and stop waving your stupidity like a flag of honour. You are Stewart Pinkerton and I claim my five pounds. That is the end of that then. You are not an engineer - you have never been an engineer and you can never be an engineer. So for goodness sake stop posting stuff that is trying to sound like engineering when it is in fact unmitigated balls. I already told you, it is no longer funny. Stick to whatever it is you know about. d Don. Have you taken your Andrew's liver salts this morning? You are sounding like a grumpy old man:-) It's a beautiful sunny day here. I am just off for a morning walk down to the sea with the Airedale. Regards to all. Iain |
Mains filters
On Thu, 16 Mar 2006 11:33:07 +0200, "Iain Churches"
wrote: Don. Have you taken your Andrew's liver salts this morning? You are sounding like a grumpy old man:-) It's a beautiful sunny day here. I am just off for a morning walk down to the sea with the Airedale. Regards to all. Iain I am a grumpy old man - that is what keeps me so happy. Today it is trying to snow, and I am about to go for a walk down to Sainsbury's to get some food. Just heard a thing on the radio about the London olympics in 2012, so that is another excuse for me to snarl at people. Does anybody - apart from those unmentionable lycra-wearers - give a flying stuff about the Commonwealth Games? The opening ceremony was on telly last night, and what little I saw was truly bizarre; definitely not to be switched on during the next two weeks or whatever. d Pearce Consulting http://www.pearce.uk.com |
Mains filters
"Glenn Richards" wrote in message ... Rich Wilson wrote: If you're going to upgrade your power cable you really ought to do it all the way back to the substation, otherwise it's a bit pointless... Well that was my initial thought... but apparently not. In a conversation I had with a friend, we determined that power cables are good at carrying low frequencies, and poor at carrying higher frequencies. So RFI picked up at the substation won't make it to your house, but interference sources in your house will cause RFI to reach your kit. That actually isn't true. Until recently, when the amateur radio community, via first the R.A. and then Ofcom, managed to get it stopped, there were tests of a system call PLT ( power line transmission ). This system placed RF carriers up to about 30MHz, onto the domestic mains supply. The purpose was for data transmission of the broadband internet variety. However, no matter how balanced the mains supply is, it still isn't good enough to prevent common mode currents at these sorts of frequencies, and therin lies one of the major problems with this technology. The whole mains supply network, from the injection point at the substation, to your house, has a tendency to radiate like a dammed great antenna, at times causing serious interference to legitimate receiving equipment - and thats not a hifi, it's a radio. It was eventually determined that there were better, more efficient, and less troublesome technologies available for broadband delivery, and dropped, at least here, although I believe that there may still be some places in Europe where the tests are still happening. Bear in mind also, that the generating and distribution companies, use this, or a similar high frequency technology, in-house to carry telemetry data around their grid distribution network. So, just to recap, the mains power distribution system can successfully carry HF, as well as LF, all the way to your house. As far as interference escaping from your equipment goes, it certainly shouldn't, under strict EU regulations. Any electrical / electronic equipment sold in the EU, should carry CE certification, and one of the requirements of this certification, is that the equipment does not either send crap out onto the mains, above a certain very low level, nor directly radiate it. Further, the equipment's normal performance must not be compromised in any way, by the presence of high level RF or pulse interference, either introduced into any outside-world ports, the mains supply being one such, or by direct radiation. So again, to recap. If the equipment is reasonably recent, and the manufacturer is playing by the rules, it should not feed any crap onto the mains supply. If your hifi manufacturer has played by the rules, his kit should not respond to any such crap, that got onto the mains by any route. All that said, there's no harm at all in helping your kit out by fitting a surge arrester plug, which contains VDRs, and if you find a good one, it should have RF suppression in the form of LCR in it, as well. Worth a tenner for the surge protection at least, and the ' belt and braces ' for the filtering that should already be in your kit, but I certainly wouldn't pay any more. Even then, I would probably spend the rest of the week trying to work out if my money would have been better spent on 4 pints ... Arfa |
Mains filters
Arfa Daily wrote:
In a conversation I had with a friend, we determined that power cables are good at carrying low frequencies, and poor at carrying higher frequencies. So RFI picked up at the substation won't make it to your house, but interference sources in your house will cause RFI to reach your kit. That actually isn't true. Until recently, when the amateur radio community, via first the R.A. and then Ofcom, managed to get it stopped, there were tests of a system call PLT ( power line transmission ). This system placed RF carriers up to about 30MHz, onto the domestic mains supply. This technology actually exists (possibly at a different frequency), and works very well. About 18 months ago some student friends asked me if I could get broadband around their shared house. First thoughts were WLAN of course, so I duly ordered a broadband account for them, and set up a wireless router in a central location, with wireless cards in all the PCs and laptops allowing everyone to access the internet through it. Unfortunately, it was a rather large house, and there was a huge dead spot on the ground floor. So... enter HomePlug. Whacked a HomePlug powerline networking bridge into the router via wired Ethernet, and plugged a HomePlug access point in on the ground floor in the middle of the dead spot. Which solved the problem. All that said, there's no harm at all in helping your kit out by fitting a surge arrester plug, which contains VDRs, and if you find a good one, it should have RF suppression in the form of LCR in it, as well. Worth a tenner for the surge protection at least, and the ' belt and braces ' for the filtering that should already be in your kit, but I certainly wouldn't pay any more. Even then, I would probably spend the rest of the week trying to work out if my money would have been better spent on 4 pints ... From a purely objective point of view, it's worth spending a tenner (of a fiver trade) on a surge protected strip to protect 2 grand's worth of kit, especially if you happen to live somewhere where there's dodgy power. Yay rural areas... -- Glenn Richards Tel: (01453) 845735 Squirrel Solutions http://www.squirrelsolutions.co.uk/ IT consultancy, hardware and software support, broadband installation |
Mains filters
It was eventually determined that there were better, more efficient, and
less troublesome technologies available for broadband delivery, and dropped, at least here, although I believe that there may still be some places in Europe where the tests are still happening. Bear in mind also, that the generating and distribution companies, use this, or a similar high frequency technology, in-house to carry telemetry data around their grid distribution network. What over the 475 kV grid?, don't you mean via the fibre optic at the top running along the "aerial" earth wire?.... -- Tony Sayer |
Mains filters
Don Pearce wrote:
So for goodness sake stop posting stuff that is trying to sound like engineering when it is in fact unmitigated balls. I already told you, it is no longer funny. Stick to whatever it is you know about. So the bottom line is that you don't believe RFI filtering will make a difference. Why didn't you just say that? Why did you have to resort to posting all that crap, in response to what was quite a serious question? What really is no longer funny is that when one posts a question or observation on this group that doesn't quite fit within the narrow viewpoints of certain people that think they own and run this newsgroup, all hell breaks loose, making it impossible to have a civilised discussion about anything at all. Because there's always someone who will disagree with subject "x" enough to start hurling personal insults around. If your opinion is that filtering won't make a difference, state your opinion, avoid personal insults, and let civilised debate commence. Sadly there doesn't appear to be a uk.rec.hi-fi where those of us who can tell the difference between bell wire and 105-strand speaker cable can have a discussion about which cable sounds best with which equipment, without the likes of yourselves or Pinkerton (to name but two) chiming in with "********" or words to that effect. We've got uk.rec.audio.vinyl now, why not have uk.rec.audio.hi-fi or audiophile as well? -- Glenn Richards Tel: (01453) 845735 Squirrel Solutions http://www.squirrelsolutions.co.uk/ IT consultancy, hardware and software support, broadband installation |
Mains filters
"Iain Churches" wrote in message ... "Don Pearce" wrote in message ... On Thu, 16 Mar 2006 10:39:13 +0200, "Iain Churches" wrote: Hi Don. I have a feeling you are right. In many years of large recording sessions, with hundreds of cables and interconnects I have never seen a mains filter unit in use. A lot of Pro equipment includes a mains filter as part of the IEC mains socket. I have VDRs fitted to the plugs feeding all my audio and computer equipment, as I've found it helps reduce the number of unexplained lock-ups, when only a power cycle will unlock the kit. I only get one or two a year now, as opposed to one or two a month without them. I do live out in the sticks, so my supply may well have less urban hash on it, but possibly more surges. S. |
Mains filters
Don Pearce wrote:
Not while you are posting, it wouldn't. Stop now and lower the noise floor by 20dB. Pinkerton? Is that you? :-P -- Glenn Richards Tel: (01453) 845735 Squirrel Solutions http://www.squirrelsolutions.co.uk/ IT consultancy, hardware and software support, broadband installation |
Mains filters
In article , Glenn Richards wrote:
In a conversation I had with a friend, we determined that power cables are good at carrying low frequencies, and poor at carrying higher frequencies. So RFI picked up at the substation won't make it to your house, but interference sources in your house will cause RFI to reach your kit. How do you determine the electrical properties of cables by conversation? Rod. |
Mains filters
In article , Glenn Richards wrote:
I've figured out a method of constructing a filtered power cable for less than £10 materials cost, depending on quantity. Which, if the hi-fi mags are anything to go by, will sell for anything up to £60. And if it does make a perceptible difference, however tiny, that means £50 profit each time... And when it is discovered that it makes no difference whatsoever...? Rod. |
All times are GMT. The time now is 01:46 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.0.0
Copyright ©2004-2006 AudioBanter.co.uk