"MINe 109" wrote in message

In article ,
"Arny Krueger" wrote:

"MINe 109" wrote in message

In article
, "Arny
Krueger" wrote:

wrote in message
ups.com
Jim Lesurf wrote:
In article

. com,
wrote:

Jim Lesurf wrote:
In article
, Rob
[snip]

The kind of research you are talking about is simply
to expensive and time consuming for reviewers or
consmers to do.

It does take time and care. But apart from that the
expense is not really any different.


No it is quite different and to do them right there is
substantial expense.

Ahh, the Atkinson defense. Remember, this is the guy
who reviews power amps that allegedly sell for
fractions of a million dollars, but can't afford the
wherewithall that competing magazines like Stereo
Review and its sequel Sound and Vision have used for
their DBTs in the past.

I look forward to a magazine-purchased Halcro-Wavac
comparison in S&V.

Why hold S&V to a higher standard than TAS or SP?

I've already read the Halcro and Wavac reviews in TAS and
SP.

Meaning what?