The shite wot is writ here...
 

Keith G wrote:


OK...

Here you go

http://www.lurcher.org/nick/audio/ob/white.wav
http://www.lurcher.org/nick/audio/ob/pink.wav

--
Nick

The shite wot is writ here...
 

In article ,
Keith G wrote:
Judge for yourselves - here are two 'identical' clips (end of one track,
beginning of another) of extremely complex/crowded music recorded OPEN
MIC with only a peewee little lapel mic (all I got) with digital/SS
everything except the power amp on the EX3 clip, which is 300B SET
valve. No editing whatsoever, other than a Fade In and Out at the ends
to lessen the shock!

Without even listening, Keith, do yourself a favour and get a half decent
mic for this sort of test.

Lapel mics have a tailored frequency response to help with the fact that
they are in a poor position for speech. They have bass rolloff to counter
chest resonance, and mid range boost to try and improve intelligibility.
And often nothing at all at the HF end since it isn't necessary.

--
*Filthy stinking rich -- well, two out of three ain't bad

Dave Plowman London SW
To e-mail, change noise into sound.

The shite wot is writ here...
 

In article ,
Keith G wrote:
the Vivanco EM216 lapel mic I'm using ain't
*ever* going to get the low stuff, but I'll give it a go!

Just have a look at its frequency response...

http://www.lagom.nl/misc/skytronic.html

--
*How's my driving? Call 999*

Dave Plowman London SW
To e-mail, change noise into sound.

The shite wot is writ here...
 

In article ,
says...

"Tony Gartshore" wrote in message
...
In article ,
says...

There are a few 'wiseacres' here that know it all and will trot out the
stale, old 'FR drivers in horns have no top or bottom octave' hearsay
horse****.

Judge for yourselves - here are two 'identical' clips (end of one track,
beginning of another) of extremely complex/crowded music recorded OPEN
MIC
with only a peewee little lapel mic

Never mind the width.. What are the tracks Keith ?


No idea atm, Tony (and I'm late for outta here) - they are the end and
beginning of two consecutive trax on the 'The Abduction Of The Art Of Noise'
CD.

I could find them later....??

Thanks Keith, but that's enough to go on.. Explains why they sound
familiar and yet not at the same time..

T.

The shite wot is writ here...
 

Dave Plowman (News) wrote:

In article ,
Keith G wrote:

Judge for yourselves - here are two 'identical' clips (end of one track,
beginning of another) of extremely complex/crowded music recorded OPEN
MIC with only a peewee little lapel mic (all I got) with digital/SS
everything except the power amp on the EX3 clip, which is 300B SET
valve. No editing whatsoever, other than a Fade In and Out at the ends
to lessen the shock!


Without even listening, Keith, do yourself a favour and get a half decent
mic for this sort of test.


If its of any use Keith, I can lend you a Behringer ECM8000 and home
made pre if you wanted to play further. I don't need it until I get a
couple of inductors wound.

--
Nick

The shite wot is writ here...
 

"Dave Plowman (News)" wrote in message
...
In article ,
Keith G wrote:
Judge for yourselves - here are two 'identical' clips (end of one track,
beginning of another) of extremely complex/crowded music recorded OPEN
MIC with only a peewee little lapel mic (all I got) with digital/SS
everything except the power amp on the EX3 clip, which is 300B SET
valve. No editing whatsoever, other than a Fade In and Out at the ends
to lessen the shock!

Without even listening, Keith, do yourself a favour and get a half decent
mic for this sort of test.

Lapel mics have a tailored frequency response to help with the fact that
they are in a poor position for speech. They have bass rolloff to counter
chest resonance, and mid range boost to try and improve intelligibility.
And often nothing at all at the HF end since it isn't necessary.



OK, point(s) taken - my problem is I wouldn't know where to even start.
Every time I Google microphones I end up he

http://www.microphones.ru/

Then he

http://www.microphones.ru/downloads.htm

....and then get hung up on the downloads! (A couple of the topmost links
don't work, but the ones that do are so *beguiling* - start from the
bottom....!!! :-)


But I'm open to suggestions, Plowie - the ideal mic plugs straight into the
computer I suppose, but summat like this does have a certain appeal:

http://www.oktava-online.com/mkl2500.htm

Would that be suitable for piano recordings?? :-)

PS. Forget stuff like this:

http://cgi.ebay.co.uk/NEUMANN-SM69-S...QQcmdZViewItem

http://cgi.ebay.co.uk/MANLEY-REFEREN...QQcmdZViewItem

http://cgi.ebay.co.uk/Neumann-M147-T...QQcmdZViewItem

:-)


But an opinion on these would be appreciated...???

http://cgi.ebay.co.uk/MXL-V77-Tube-C...QQcmdZViewItem

http://cgi.ebay.co.uk/NEW-ART-Tube-M...QQcmdZViewItem

http://cgi.ebay.co.uk/ws/eBayISAPI.d...keT rack=true

The shite wot is writ here...
 

"Nick Gorham" wrote in message
...
Keith G wrote:


OK...

Here you go

http://www.lurcher.org/nick/audio/ob/white.wav
http://www.lurcher.org/nick/audio/ob/pink.wav


OK, got those - ta!

But I'm not sure what use they are?? I merely wanted to demonstrate the
'dynamic range' of the Lowthers as I *hear* it - obviously, it ain't gonna
happen on the lapel mic!!

The shite wot is writ here...
 

"Don Pearce" wrote in message
...
On Sun, 24 Sep 2006 17:17:13 +0100, "Keith G"
wrote:


"Don Pearce" wrote in message
.. .
On Sun, 24 Sep 2006 16:26:00 +0100, "Keith G"
wrote:


Assuming I get out in time, later/later (or maybe even tomorrow) I will
record a track from an 'enhancer disk' which sweeps from 20 to 20,480 Hz
at
the rate of + one octave every 12 seconds.

Oh you really aren't going to like the look of what that shows. Rooms
are just horrible.


OK, this is the CD track I intend to use - let me know if there's anything
unsuitable about it?

http://www.apah69.dsl.pipex.com/show/Tone%20Sweep.mp3


Also, can you confirm the start frequency - I have no trouble hearing it
from the very start, even on the computer setup with 2.5 inch drivers...??

Right, orf aht for a while now....




It starts out at 20Hz OK, but it really is unsuitable for the job. It
will spark off every standing wave in the room, and you really will be
shocked at how lumpy it is. Take up Nick's offer - it will be miles
better.

That sort of sweep is really only for internal testing of equipment,
not for rooms.


OK, forget that then. It looks like I'm going to have get summat sorted out
on the mic front.

The shite wot is writ here...
 

"Dave Plowman (News)" wrote in message
...
In article ,
Keith G wrote:
the Vivanco EM216 lapel mic I'm using ain't
*ever* going to get the low stuff, but I'll give it a go!

Just have a look at its frequency response...

http://www.lagom.nl/misc/skytronic.html



OK, even I can see that ain't too *flat*!! (See other post re mics.)

That little Vivanco mic was virtually FOC from Glenn Booth - one the
'missing' from here these days!

:-(

The shite wot is writ here...
 

"Tony Gartshore" wrote


Never mind the width.. What are the tracks Keith ?


No idea atm, Tony (and I'm late for outta here) - they are the end and
beginning of two consecutive trax on the 'The Abduction Of The Art Of
Noise'
CD.

I could find them later....??

Thanks Keith, but that's enough to go on.. Explains why they sound
familiar and yet not at the same time..


It's a compilation of AON remixes by various artists:

http://www.amazon.co.uk/Abduction-Ar...e=UTF8&s=music


I rate 60% of the trax good, 40% less so, but none of them *bad*...!!