The Worthless Wieckless trashroll of errors accelerates, was fasingle ended stereo tube amp
 

Gary Tayman wrote:

BOOM! BANG! Goway! (Reloading) BANG! BOOM!

I'd give up on the salt rifle, and try out one of those shock and awe bombs,
but these guys would just look into the sky and think it's pretty.


Rifle? Its rock salt in a sawed off shotgun. No wonder you can't run
them off! ;-)


--
Service to my country? Been there, Done that, and I've got my DD214 to
prove it.
Member of DAV #85.

Michael A. Terrell
Central Florida

The Worthless Wieckless trashroll of errors accelerates, was fa single ended stereo tube amp
 

"Michael A. Terrell" wrote in message
...


Rifle? Its rock salt in a sawed off shotgun. No wonder you can't run
them off! ;-)


(Borrowing yours)

BAANNGG! BOOOMMM! POWWW! Goway! Shoo!

By the way Michael, did you by chance make it to the Orlando meet this
morning? I got there a little late, but made it. If you should make it to
any of these, let me know so we can meet.

--
Gary E. Tayman/Tayman Electrical
Sound Solutions For Classic Cars
http://www.taymanelectrical.com

The Worthless Wieckless trashroll of errors accelerates, was fasingle ended stereo tube amp
 

Gary Tayman wrote:

"Michael A. Terrell" wrote in message
...


Rifle? Its rock salt in a sawed off shotgun. No wonder you can't run
them off! ;-)


(Borrowing yours)

BAANNGG! BOOOMMM! POWWW! Goway! Shoo!


Remember to aim for their ass. (make sure that you add some Alum to
the rock salt so their wounds pucker shut over the rock salt.) ;-)


By the way Michael, did you by chance make it to the Orlando meet this
morning? I got there a little late, but made it. If you should make it to
any of these, let me know so we can meet.


No, I couldn't find a ride, even though I offered to chip in for gas.
I was given two email addresses for people who had to pass me on the
way. Only one replied, to tell me he didn't have any room. I wanted to
go, but I'll have to try next time. Its probably a good thing that i
couldn't today. I had a couple large pressure sores pop up and burst a
few days ago, and I really don't need to be on my feet much, for a week
or so.

Now I really have to go, to get my shotgun back. :-)


--
Service to my country? Been there, Done that, and I've got my DD214 to
prove it.
Member of DAV #85.

Michael A. Terrell
Central Florida

The Worthless Wieckless trashroll of errors accelerates, was fa single ended stereo tube amp
 

"Michael A. Terrell" wrote in message
...
Gary Tayman wrote:

"Michael A. Terrell" wrote in message
...

No, I couldn't find a ride, even though I offered to chip in for gas.
I was given two email addresses for people who had to pass me on the
way. Only one replied, to tell me he didn't have any room. I wanted to
go, but I'll have to try next time. Its probably a good thing that i
couldn't today.

.... I guess that tells you something ...

The Worthless Wieckless trashroll of errors accelerates, was fa single ended stereo tube amp
 

I find it a sorry state of affairs when I see these fragmented responses
after filtering. None of this needs posting here. Responders are just as
whacky as the original poster. Original poster may be certifiably insane,
but responders seem likewise to me.

Phil B


wrote in message
oups.com...

John Byrns wrote:
In article .com,
Peter Wieck wrote:

On May 24, 8:23 am, "hydebee" wrote:
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll...m=150125684898

What makes you think this is "single-ended" and not PP? 2 x 6BQ5 and
that it is a Magnavox strongly suggests a PP configuration.

Peter, have you lost all your marbles, are you blind, or both?

Being bled out, as Worthless Wieckless was, robs the brain of blood
and thus oxygen. Result: zero thought (a familiar condition to
Wieckless!).

Add to that exsanguinated lassitude the distraction of being knackered
into Wiecklessness, what Gray Glasser so delicately describes as the
"unmanning" (1) of Worthless (heh-heh, Gray, you learned a lot from
observing me a couple of years, in particular to go directly for the
bal-- I mean the jugular! LOL!), and you can see how the Worthless
trashroll of errors will pile up even faster from now onwards.


The photos show two input jacks, and two output transformers, isn't that
strongly suggestive of it being a stereo amp, in which case it doesn't
have enough tubes for it to be anything but "single-ended", PP would
require 4 x 6BQ5.

You reward might be in another world, John, but here on earth I've
long since given up explaining to Wieckless as a waste of time.

It isn't as if Worthless Wieckless, even before I bled him even dumber
and then knackered him, were (2) even remotely knowledgeable. He
didn't know what ballasts do, he thought resistors dissipate to their
power limit regardless of the actual amount of current through them,
he earlier gave another wretched display of mistaking an SE amp for
PP, and much, much more of his dire ignorance. Besides ignorance,
Wieckless is a nasty little ingrate whose idea of thanks is dully
unimaginative abuse liberally layered over his benefactor.

Regards,

John Byrns

--
Surf my web pages at, http://fmamradios.com/

Andre Jute
No real corpses were harmed in the assembly of my golem Worthless
Wieckless
-- CE Statement of Conformity

(1) Hey, Gray, I loved the double entendre of "unmanned" to imply both
the fact that my golem Wieckless is a mule which cannot breed and
that, to make doubly sure the offal I stuffed into the sock to make
the puppet doesn't replicate to stink us out, I knocked the bricks on
his testicles. For the rest of you, Gray considers words with leery
cynicism because that's his job, but those of you who have dreams of
being writers, or even stylists, or even the modest (ha!) ambition of
going head to head with Lord Valve and winning just once, even a
little one (it's harder than you think), ask yourselves if you caught
that reference unaided. Those who did can be wits, perhaps even
writers; the rest will at best be audiophiles forever.

(2) sic; those who don't grasp the beauty of grammar, refer to Fowler

The Worthless Wieckless trashroll of errors accelerates, was fa single ended stereo tube amp
 

Andre's sock puppets?!

Omer


"Phil B" wrote in message
news:bP96i.287$106.213@trndny02...
I find it a sorry state of affairs when I see these fragmented responses
after filtering. None of this needs posting here. Responders are just as
whacky as the original poster. Original poster may be certifiably insane,
but responders seem likewise to me.

Phil B


wrote in message
oups.com...

John Byrns wrote:
In article .com,
Peter Wieck wrote:

On May 24, 8:23 am, "hydebee" wrote:
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll...m=150125684898

What makes you think this is "single-ended" and not PP? 2 x 6BQ5 and
that it is a Magnavox strongly suggests a PP configuration.

Peter, have you lost all your marbles, are you blind, or both?

Being bled out, as Worthless Wieckless was, robs the brain of blood
and thus oxygen. Result: zero thought (a familiar condition to
Wieckless!).

Add to that exsanguinated lassitude the distraction of being knackered
into Wiecklessness, what Gray Glasser so delicately describes as the
"unmanning" (1) of Worthless (heh-heh, Gray, you learned a lot from
observing me a couple of years, in particular to go directly for the
bal-- I mean the jugular! LOL!), and you can see how the Worthless
trashroll of errors will pile up even faster from now onwards.


The photos show two input jacks, and two output transformers, isn't that
strongly suggestive of it being a stereo amp, in which case it doesn't
have enough tubes for it to be anything but "single-ended", PP would
require 4 x 6BQ5.

You reward might be in another world, John, but here on earth I've
long since given up explaining to Wieckless as a waste of time.

It isn't as if Worthless Wieckless, even before I bled him even dumber
and then knackered him, were (2) even remotely knowledgeable. He
didn't know what ballasts do, he thought resistors dissipate to their
power limit regardless of the actual amount of current through them,
he earlier gave another wretched display of mistaking an SE amp for
PP, and much, much more of his dire ignorance. Besides ignorance,
Wieckless is a nasty little ingrate whose idea of thanks is dully
unimaginative abuse liberally layered over his benefactor.

Regards,

John Byrns

--
Surf my web pages at, http://fmamradios.com/

Andre Jute
No real corpses were harmed in the assembly of my golem Worthless
Wieckless
-- CE Statement of Conformity

(1) Hey, Gray, I loved the double entendre of "unmanned" to imply both
the fact that my golem Wieckless is a mule which cannot breed and
that, to make doubly sure the offal I stuffed into the sock to make
the puppet doesn't replicate to stink us out, I knocked the bricks on
his testicles. For the rest of you, Gray considers words with leery
cynicism because that's his job, but those of you who have dreams of
being writers, or even stylists, or even the modest (ha!) ambition of
going head to head with Lord Valve and winning just once, even a
little one (it's harder than you think), ask yourselves if you caught
that reference unaided. Those who did can be wits, perhaps even
writers; the rest will at best be audiophiles forever.

(2) sic; those who don't grasp the beauty of grammar, refer to Fowler

The Worthless Wieckless trashroll of errors accelerates, was fa single ended stereo tube amp
 

Phil, in case you didn't notice you have just placed yourself in the
category of "certifiably insane" you have placed others in.

More to the point, what is wrong with correcting Peter's factual error
when he suggested that the original poster was incorrectly describing
the amplifier in question? Do you want this group to be full of
misinformation like the forums?


Regards,

John Byrns


In article bP96i.287$106.213@trndny02,
"Phil B" wrote:

I find it a sorry state of affairs when I see these fragmented responses
after filtering. None of this needs posting here. Responders are just as
whacky as the original poster. Original poster may be certifiably insane,
but responders seem likewise to me.

Phil B


wrote in message
oups.com...

John Byrns wrote:
In article .com,
Peter Wieck wrote:

On May 24, 8:23 am, "hydebee" wrote:
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll...m=150125684898

What makes you think this is "single-ended" and not PP? 2 x 6BQ5 and
that it is a Magnavox strongly suggests a PP configuration.

Peter, have you lost all your marbles, are you blind, or both?

Being bled out, as Worthless Wieckless was, robs the brain of blood
and thus oxygen. Result: zero thought (a familiar condition to
Wieckless!).

Add to that exsanguinated lassitude the distraction of being knackered
into Wiecklessness, what Gray Glasser so delicately describes as the
"unmanning" (1) of Worthless (heh-heh, Gray, you learned a lot from
observing me a couple of years, in particular to go directly for the
bal-- I mean the jugular! LOL!), and you can see how the Worthless
trashroll of errors will pile up even faster from now onwards.


The photos show two input jacks, and two output transformers, isn't that
strongly suggestive of it being a stereo amp, in which case it doesn't
have enough tubes for it to be anything but "single-ended", PP would
require 4 x 6BQ5.

You reward might be in another world, John, but here on earth I've
long since given up explaining to Wieckless as a waste of time.

It isn't as if Worthless Wieckless, even before I bled him even dumber
and then knackered him, were (2) even remotely knowledgeable. He
didn't know what ballasts do, he thought resistors dissipate to their
power limit regardless of the actual amount of current through them,
he earlier gave another wretched display of mistaking an SE amp for
PP, and much, much more of his dire ignorance. Besides ignorance,
Wieckless is a nasty little ingrate whose idea of thanks is dully
unimaginative abuse liberally layered over his benefactor.

Regards,

John Byrns

--
Surf my web pages at, http://fmamradios.com/

Andre Jute
No real corpses were harmed in the assembly of my golem Worthless
Wieckless
-- CE Statement of Conformity

(1) Hey, Gray, I loved the double entendre of "unmanned" to imply both
the fact that my golem Wieckless is a mule which cannot breed and
that, to make doubly sure the offal I stuffed into the sock to make
the puppet doesn't replicate to stink us out, I knocked the bricks on
his testicles. For the rest of you, Gray considers words with leery
cynicism because that's his job, but those of you who have dreams of
being writers, or even stylists, or even the modest (ha!) ambition of
going head to head with Lord Valve and winning just once, even a
little one (it's harder than you think), ask yourselves if you caught
that reference unaided. Those who did can be wits, perhaps even
writers; the rest will at best be audiophiles forever.

(2) sic; those who don't grasp the beauty of grammar, refer to Fowler


--
Surf my web pages at, http://fmamradios.com/

The Worthless Wieckless trashroll of errors accelerates, was fa single ended stereo tube amp
 

On May 24, 11:20 pm, Andre Jute wrote:

(snip)

... 16 is apparently 2*4).

(snip)

No, that's 8.
16 is 2^4
Cheers,
Roger

The Worthless Wieckless trashroll of errors accelerates, was fa single ended stereo tube amp
 

Jeeze. Now I see why this trash appeared so fragmented. This thread is cross
posted to 4 newsgroups. That's a great way to trash multiple groups at the
same time! Previous related threads were posted only to RAT. I was picking
up only the latest venom from RAR+P.

Phil B

"Phil B" wrote in message
news:bP96i.287$106.213@trndny02...
I find it a sorry state of affairs when I see these fragmented responses
after filtering. None of this needs posting here. Responders are just as
whacky as the original poster. Original poster may be certifiably insane,
but responders seem likewise to me.

Phil B


wrote in message
oups.com...

John Byrns wrote:
In article .com,
Peter Wieck wrote:

On May 24, 8:23 am, "hydebee" wrote:
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll...m=150125684898

What makes you think this is "single-ended" and not PP? 2 x 6BQ5 and
that it is a Magnavox strongly suggests a PP configuration.

Peter, have you lost all your marbles, are you blind, or both?

Being bled out, as Worthless Wieckless was, robs the brain of blood
and thus oxygen. Result: zero thought (a familiar condition to
Wieckless!).

Add to that exsanguinated lassitude the distraction of being knackered
into Wiecklessness, what Gray Glasser so delicately describes as the
"unmanning" (1) of Worthless (heh-heh, Gray, you learned a lot from
observing me a couple of years, in particular to go directly for the
bal-- I mean the jugular! LOL!), and you can see how the Worthless
trashroll of errors will pile up even faster from now onwards.


The photos show two input jacks, and two output transformers, isn't that
strongly suggestive of it being a stereo amp, in which case it doesn't
have enough tubes for it to be anything but "single-ended", PP would
require 4 x 6BQ5.

You reward might be in another world, John, but here on earth I've
long since given up explaining to Wieckless as a waste of time.

It isn't as if Worthless Wieckless, even before I bled him even dumber
and then knackered him, were (2) even remotely knowledgeable. He
didn't know what ballasts do, he thought resistors dissipate to their
power limit regardless of the actual amount of current through them,
he earlier gave another wretched display of mistaking an SE amp for
PP, and much, much more of his dire ignorance. Besides ignorance,
Wieckless is a nasty little ingrate whose idea of thanks is dully
unimaginative abuse liberally layered over his benefactor.

Regards,

John Byrns

--
Surf my web pages at, http://fmamradios.com/

Andre Jute
No real corpses were harmed in the assembly of my golem Worthless
Wieckless
-- CE Statement of Conformity

(1) Hey, Gray, I loved the double entendre of "unmanned" to imply both
the fact that my golem Wieckless is a mule which cannot breed and
that, to make doubly sure the offal I stuffed into the sock to make
the puppet doesn't replicate to stink us out, I knocked the bricks on
his testicles. For the rest of you, Gray considers words with leery
cynicism because that's his job, but those of you who have dreams of
being writers, or even stylists, or even the modest (ha!) ambition of
going head to head with Lord Valve and winning just once, even a
little one (it's harder than you think), ask yourselves if you caught
that reference unaided. Those who did can be wits, perhaps even
writers; the rest will at best be audiophiles forever.

(2) sic; those who don't grasp the beauty of grammar, refer to Fowler

The Worthless Wieckless trashroll of errors accelerates, was fa single ended stereo tube amp
 

Yo, Phil B:

The guy you want to blame is one Arny Krueger, an "engineer" who hangs
out on rec.audio.opinion. Your original question -- How does this end
up on rec.antiques.radio+phono? -- struck me as so interesting that,
before going off on a 100 mile drive in the lanes and Sunday lunch at
The Snug in Bantry, I called a couple of grad students and told them
to stop canoodling and instead make a transaction analysis of the
various threads and find out who dunnit. I've just received the first
verbal report and a written report will be published in a few weeks if
you are interested.

An internet slug called Peter Wieck has been trashing every one of my
posts for 18 months or so. I just ignored him. We get the likes of
him, who fancy themselves literate, all the time; it is like a fat
little go-kart driver bragging, "Look Ma, I rubbed a Nascar Trucks
hard man into the wall!", and in the next second the truck racer says,
"What was that pimple in the road I just drove over?" Meanwhile this
Wieck creep, apparently some kind of a jumped-up janitor from
Philadelphia, proved so technically incompetent that John Byrns, a
senior man on RAT, nicknamed him Useless Wieck. George Middius of RAO
then changed Useless into "Worthless" to account for both technical
incompetence and Wieck's observable moral degeneracy as a constant
bully and hypocrite. I added "Wiecky" on account of the little man's
pettiness, and now he was Worthless Wiecky. The other thing you need
to know is that I'm a novelist (see URL under my sig) and some of my
books, which resulted in sovereign governments sending assassins after
me, were published under a pseudonym; Worthless Wiecky, like every
other stalker, pretends to know the facts of his victim's life better
than the victim himself; in particular Worthless pretended that Andre
Jute (that's me now) is a sock puppet of the pseudonym Andrew McCoy.
You can still see the stalker syndrome in Worthless Wiecky's so-called
apology, in which he pretends I'm some kind of a handicapped person
(I've already demonstrated I'm mentally perfectly capable of taking
care of a jumped-up janitor, and the next time I pass through Philly,
I'm perfectly happy, should there be any demand for it, to break
Worthless's arms and legs to demonstrate that I am physically
perfectly capable too). That's the background.

So, after 18 months of mostly ignoring Worthless Wiecky, I see a post
from George Middius about the way the stalker Worthless Wiecky tries
to confuse my identity. The botch Worthless has made of this simple
little job over no less than 18 months (Jesus, how does this
incompetent earn a living?) offends me, so I dash off a quick, funny
post confessing to having created Worthless Wiecky as my sock puppet.
An exceedingly literal flatbilly biblebasher called Kenny XXX then
abuses me for having, in contravention of scriptural probibition,
created a "gollam" and I point out that my golem Worthless was made,
not from genuine corpses, but from offal stuffed into a sock.

At this point Arny Krueger, who earlier got badly scorched by his own
hubris when I set him up as a lab rat in an experiment for a few
gifted students of motivational psychology, starts claiming that
Worthless Wiecky won the argument. When It is pointed out to Krueger
by John Byrns that on the premier conferences where I can be found
(RAT, UKRA, RAO) there is not a spot of my blood but the carpet is
ankle-deep in Worthless Wiecky's blood, Krueger, cornered in another
lie, then claims Worthless did the damage on rec.antiques.radio+phono.

At this point Gray Glasser published an analysis of whose blood had
been spilled and, presumably because Krueger insisted that
rec.antiques.radio+phono was relevant, included rec.antiques.radio
+phono in the distribution list. Gray also pointed out that a golem
can't breed and I supplied the detail that just to make sure of it I
crashed the bricks on Worthless Wiecky's balls and thus turned him
into Worthless Wieckless, dickless golem. If you want to check this
account, rec.audio.tubes has all the posts, starting about a fortnight
back.

My entire involvement in this affair was less than 15 minutes to
dictate a couple of whimsical posts, and after it was over another
twenty minutes for a phone call to get an answer to your question
about who involved rec.antiques.radio+phono, receive the analysis and
dictate this post. So,while you might normally say that I have a
better understanding of the critical path of a flame war and its
conduct than anyone else on the net, and all the necessary
psychological and polemical skills to put it in train with the minimum
of exertion, in this instance it wasn't me who involved some obscure
little newsgroup, it was Arny Krueger who dunnit. In fact, I have an
alibi: I wasn't even in town, I was away overnight, dining at Lord
Kenmare's, when it happened. On my return, seeing that some of my own
friends were disturbed enough by the fall of Worthless Wieckless to
describe it as "brutal, ugly and one-sided" -- what else could it be:
I'm a professional polemicist and Wieckless is a janitor -- I ducked
out of the threads before I started generating sympathy for this
undeserving little stalker Worthless Wieckless.

There's your answer, Phil B. Go kick Krueger. He's the evil kingpin
who involved innocent little old rec.antiques.radio+phono in the
stalking "career" of Worthless Wieckless, golem. Krueger anyway richly
deserves kicking any time you see him.

Of course, the primary involvement of rec.antiques.radio+phono is by
Worthless Wieckless, for abusing me there behind my back (use Google
to search for McCoy and Jute). But I presume you fellows on
rec.antiques.radio+phono can punish Wieckless adequately for his
crimes. If you need help, call.

Andre Jute
Visit Andre at http://members.lycos.co.uk/fiultra/
No real corpses were harmed in the assembly of the golem Worthless
Wieckless -- CE Statement of Conformity

Phil B wrote:
Jeeze. Now I see why this trash appeared so fragmented. This thread is cross
posted to 4 newsgroups. That's a great way to trash multiple groups at the
same time! Previous related threads were posted only to RAT. I was picking
up only the latest venom from RAR+P.

Phil B

"Phil B" wrote in message
news:bP96i.287$106.213@trndny02...
I find it a sorry state of affairs when I see these fragmented responses
after filtering. None of this needs posting here. Responders are just as
whacky as the original poster. Original poster may be certifiably insane,
but responders seem likewise to me.

Phil B


wrote in message
oups.com...

John Byrns wrote:
In article .com,
Peter Wieck wrote:

On May 24, 8:23 am, "hydebee" wrote:
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll...m=150125684898

What makes you think this is "single-ended" and not PP? 2 x 6BQ5 and
that it is a Magnavox strongly suggests a PP configuration.

Peter, have you lost all your marbles, are you blind, or both?

Being bled out, as Worthless Wieckless was, robs the brain of blood
and thus oxygen. Result: zero thought (a familiar condition to
Wieckless!).

Add to that exsanguinated lassitude the distraction of being knackered
into Wiecklessness, what Gray Glasser so delicately describes as the
"unmanning" (1) of Worthless (heh-heh, Gray, you learned a lot from
observing me a couple of years, in particular to go directly for the
bal-- I mean the jugular! LOL!), and you can see how the Worthless
trashroll of errors will pile up even faster from now onwards.


The photos show two input jacks, and two output transformers, isn't that
strongly suggestive of it being a stereo amp, in which case it doesn't
have enough tubes for it to be anything but "single-ended", PP would
require 4 x 6BQ5.

You reward might be in another world, John, but here on earth I've
long since given up explaining to Wieckless as a waste of time.

It isn't as if Worthless Wieckless, even before I bled him even dumber
and then knackered him, were (2) even remotely knowledgeable. He
didn't know what ballasts do, he thought resistors dissipate to their
power limit regardless of the actual amount of current through them,
he earlier gave another wretched display of mistaking an SE amp for
PP, and much, much more of his dire ignorance. Besides ignorance,
Wieckless is a nasty little ingrate whose idea of thanks is dully
unimaginative abuse liberally layered over his benefactor.

Regards,

John Byrns

--
Surf my web pages at, http://fmamradios.com/

Andre Jute
No real corpses were harmed in the assembly of my golem Worthless
Wieckless
-- CE Statement of Conformity

(1) Hey, Gray, I loved the double entendre of "unmanned" to imply both
the fact that my golem Wieckless is a mule which cannot breed and
that, to make doubly sure the offal I stuffed into the sock to make
the puppet doesn't replicate to stink us out, I knocked the bricks on
his testicles. For the rest of you, Gray considers words with leery
cynicism because that's his job, but those of you who have dreams of
being writers, or even stylists, or even the modest (ha!) ambition of
going head to head with Lord Valve and winning just once, even a
little one (it's harder than you think), ask yourselves if you caught
that reference unaided. Those who did can be wits, perhaps even
writers; the rest will at best be audiophiles forever.

(2) sic; those who don't grasp the beauty of grammar, refer to Fowler