Urgent request
 

"Lebowski" wrote in

Hehehehe this thread is cracking me up. In one corner -
the pious fine
citizen of society strictly adhering to the letter of the
law; on the other
side - a dude who stands up for the "ordinary guy's" point
of view, not so
worked-up over such matters. It's a wonderful tussle.
Gotta love Usenet! :)

Your right, it is a pretty humorous thread!

Can't get excited or worked up over a few pennies of
copyright royalties!

On usenet, you survive by your wits only, nothing else
matters! ;-)

Urgent request
 

On Sat, 25 Oct 2003 23:27:04 +0100, "Stimpy"
wrote:

Zipper wrote:
If the church were a member of PRS the money would be collected and
distributed by them. No-one would hassle the family for a royalty cheque


And if not? What would you do about it? N-O-T-H-I-N-G! You're just
spouting BS to line your pockets.

Urgent request
 

On Sat, 25 Oct 2003 23:27:04 +0100, "Stimpy"
wrote:

Zipper wrote:
If the church were a member of PRS the money would be collected and
distributed by them. No-one would hassle the family for a royalty cheque


And if not? What would you do about it? N-O-T-H-I-N-G! You're just
spouting BS to line your pockets.

Urgent request
 

On Sun, 26 Oct 2003 12:06:33 +1300, "Lebowski"
wrote:


"Zipper" wrote in message
.. .
On Sat, 25 Oct 2003 17:39:01 +0100, "Stimpy"
wrote:

Baggy wrote:

The whole point is, nobodys playing for profit or making any money
over playing the tune, yet this jerk tells us we should be very
careful or we might get in trouble. Only a gr1 arsehole would post
something like that over a funeral. It's not enough someones loved one
is being laid to rest, but now the family is supposed to worry about
the cops showing up ands arresting them for playing a tune. What a sad
jerkoff he is...

You really are a **** aren't you? The OP was merely expressing a
reluctance to break copyright law by playing a commercial recording at a
funeral. Given that copyright law still applies and the church is
unlikely
to hold a PRS licence, it seems a reasonable concern.

Petty arsehole.

Hehehehe this thread is cracking me up. In one corner - the pious fine
citizen of society strictly adhering to the letter of the law; on the other
side - a dude who stands up for the "ordinary guy's" point of view, not so
worked-up over such matters. It's a wonderful tussle. Gotta love Usenet! :)

Watch it, you're coming periliously close to being called a petty
arsehole too!!!! G

Urgent request
 

On Sun, 26 Oct 2003 12:06:33 +1300, "Lebowski"
wrote:


"Zipper" wrote in message
.. .
On Sat, 25 Oct 2003 17:39:01 +0100, "Stimpy"
wrote:

Baggy wrote:

The whole point is, nobodys playing for profit or making any money
over playing the tune, yet this jerk tells us we should be very
careful or we might get in trouble. Only a gr1 arsehole would post
something like that over a funeral. It's not enough someones loved one
is being laid to rest, but now the family is supposed to worry about
the cops showing up ands arresting them for playing a tune. What a sad
jerkoff he is...

You really are a **** aren't you? The OP was merely expressing a
reluctance to break copyright law by playing a commercial recording at a
funeral. Given that copyright law still applies and the church is
unlikely
to hold a PRS licence, it seems a reasonable concern.

Petty arsehole.

Hehehehe this thread is cracking me up. In one corner - the pious fine
citizen of society strictly adhering to the letter of the law; on the other
side - a dude who stands up for the "ordinary guy's" point of view, not so
worked-up over such matters. It's a wonderful tussle. Gotta love Usenet! :)

Watch it, you're coming periliously close to being called a petty
arsehole too!!!! G

Urgent request
 

In article , Zipper
writes
On Sat, 25 Oct 2003 09:10:30 +0100, Bernard Hill
wrote:

We are literally talking pennies per playing here.

EXACTLY! It just illustrates what a petty arsehole you are.



I consider, sir, that you are being abusive. It is possibly because of
the cross-posting going on here. On the forum I am visiting
(uk.music.misc) we tend to be polite.

The point is not what the cost is, but what the right thing to do is.



Bernard Hill
Braeburn Software
Author of Music Publisher system
Music Software written by musicians for musicians
http://www.braeburn.co.uk
Selkirk, Scotland

Urgent request
 

In article , Zipper
writes
On Sat, 25 Oct 2003 09:10:30 +0100, Bernard Hill
wrote:

We are literally talking pennies per playing here.

EXACTLY! It just illustrates what a petty arsehole you are.



I consider, sir, that you are being abusive. It is possibly because of
the cross-posting going on here. On the forum I am visiting
(uk.music.misc) we tend to be polite.

The point is not what the cost is, but what the right thing to do is.



Bernard Hill
Braeburn Software
Author of Music Publisher system
Music Software written by musicians for musicians
http://www.braeburn.co.uk
Selkirk, Scotland

Urgent request
 

In article , Baggy
writes
On Sat, 25 Oct 2003 01:38:36 +0100, Ian Molton wrote:

On Sat, 25 Oct 2003 00:35:02 GMT
Baggy wrote:

In other words, a gr1 arsehole.

Profanity aside, I think that any decent musician would be HAPPY that
you played their work at a funeral, and wouldnt try to rob the bereaved
blind either.

The whole point is, nobodys playing for profit or making any money
over playing the tune, yet this jerk tells us we should be very
careful or we might get in trouble.

Actually I said nothing about getting into trouble. I was pointing out
the right thing to do.

Only a gr1 arsehole would post
something like that over a funeral. It's not enough someones loved one
is being laid to rest, but now the family is supposed to worry about
the cops showing up ands arresting them for playing a tune. What a sad
jerkoff he is...

Sir, you are being abusive. Please desist.

I suspect I attend and am involved in more funerals than you, since I
play the organ for them all in my church, so have considerable sympathy
for the bereaved. My comments were in fact aimed at the church, whose
responsibility it is to attend to these copyright matters.

I really don't remember any mention of "cops" or "arrest". In fact
copyright breach is a civil offence and not a criminal one.


Bernard Hill
Braeburn Software
Author of Music Publisher system
Music Software written by musicians for musicians
http://www.braeburn.co.uk
Selkirk, Scotland

Urgent request
 

In article , Baggy
writes
On Sat, 25 Oct 2003 01:38:36 +0100, Ian Molton wrote:

On Sat, 25 Oct 2003 00:35:02 GMT
Baggy wrote:

In other words, a gr1 arsehole.

Profanity aside, I think that any decent musician would be HAPPY that
you played their work at a funeral, and wouldnt try to rob the bereaved
blind either.

The whole point is, nobodys playing for profit or making any money
over playing the tune, yet this jerk tells us we should be very
careful or we might get in trouble.

Actually I said nothing about getting into trouble. I was pointing out
the right thing to do.

Only a gr1 arsehole would post
something like that over a funeral. It's not enough someones loved one
is being laid to rest, but now the family is supposed to worry about
the cops showing up ands arresting them for playing a tune. What a sad
jerkoff he is...

Sir, you are being abusive. Please desist.

I suspect I attend and am involved in more funerals than you, since I
play the organ for them all in my church, so have considerable sympathy
for the bereaved. My comments were in fact aimed at the church, whose
responsibility it is to attend to these copyright matters.

I really don't remember any mention of "cops" or "arrest". In fact
copyright breach is a civil offence and not a criminal one.


Bernard Hill
Braeburn Software
Author of Music Publisher system
Music Software written by musicians for musicians
http://www.braeburn.co.uk
Selkirk, Scotland

Urgent request
 

In article ,
Comp Piper writes

"Lebowski" wrote in

Hehehehe this thread is cracking me up. In one corner -
the pious fine
citizen of society strictly adhering to the letter of the
law; on the other
side - a dude who stands up for the "ordinary guy's" point
of view, not so
worked-up over such matters. It's a wonderful tussle.
Gotta love Usenet! :)

Your right, it is a pretty humorous thread!

Can't get excited or worked up over a few pennies of
copyright royalties!

On usenet, you survive by your wits only, nothing else
matters! ;-)

On uk.music.misc we are used to politeness and helpfulness.


Bernard Hill
Braeburn Software
Author of Music Publisher system
Music Software written by musicians for musicians
http://www.braeburn.co.uk
Selkirk, Scotland