Audio Banter

Audio Banter (https://www.audiobanter.co.uk/forum.php)
-   uk.rec.audio (General Audio and Hi-Fi) (https://www.audiobanter.co.uk/uk-rec-audio-general-audio/)
-   -   Urgent request (https://www.audiobanter.co.uk/uk-rec-audio-general-audio/709-urgent-request.html)

[email protected] October 26th 03 01:47 PM

Urgent request
 
On Sun, 26 Oct 2003 09:28:44 +0000, Bernard Hill
wrote:


Agreed there. But they may not be aware of the issue. I know my church
isn't.


Butt how could they not Burnhard? I would think with a grA arsehole
like you around that you would've made them aware.




GS October 26th 03 01:58 PM

Urgent request
 
On Sun, 26 Oct 2003 14:10:30 +0000, Kurt Hamster
wrote:

As I suspected, a brain dead troll. You must be a net newbie 'cos there
is no challenge in dealing with someone like you who seems to think a
string of invective is the ideal troll. I suggest you do some research
if you want to excel at your chosen pastime.


Well arsehole you just sealed your fate. You have no idea who you are
dealing with, butt you are about to find out. Your group is as good as
dead now. Care to lay a wager or two as to wether you'll still be in a
year? Do a search on Rec.Musicmakers.bagpipe, and go back about 4
years, count the number of daily posts (well over a hundred on a slow
day) and compare it to now. I guess it just goes to show you what a
dumbass you are Burnedhard


Good luck, but only 2/10 for trying.


LOL, what a jerk.


Either rein it in, or remove the UK groups from your follow-ups


I'm here to stay. Ask RMMB what those words mean.


Sorry buttnoid, I'm here to stay, your days of "polite" are over.


I've been accused of many things before but polite has never been one of
them.


You can't even read you limey pighead? It was said (not by me) that
this little group was polite. I'm here to tell you that's over now.
RIP.

GS October 26th 03 01:58 PM

Urgent request
 
On Sun, 26 Oct 2003 14:10:30 +0000, Kurt Hamster
wrote:

As I suspected, a brain dead troll. You must be a net newbie 'cos there
is no challenge in dealing with someone like you who seems to think a
string of invective is the ideal troll. I suggest you do some research
if you want to excel at your chosen pastime.


Well arsehole you just sealed your fate. You have no idea who you are
dealing with, butt you are about to find out. Your group is as good as
dead now. Care to lay a wager or two as to wether you'll still be in a
year? Do a search on Rec.Musicmakers.bagpipe, and go back about 4
years, count the number of daily posts (well over a hundred on a slow
day) and compare it to now. I guess it just goes to show you what a
dumbass you are Burnedhard


Good luck, but only 2/10 for trying.


LOL, what a jerk.


Either rein it in, or remove the UK groups from your follow-ups


I'm here to stay. Ask RMMB what those words mean.


Sorry buttnoid, I'm here to stay, your days of "polite" are over.


I've been accused of many things before but polite has never been one of
them.


You can't even read you limey pighead? It was said (not by me) that
this little group was polite. I'm here to tell you that's over now.
RIP.

-=ôö=- October 26th 03 03:12 PM

Urgent request
 
Drop it Bernard...you are being "Trolled" quite effectively here..


"Bernard Hill" wrote in message
...
| In article , Zipper
| writes
| On Sat, 25 Oct 2003 23:27:04 +0100, "Stimpy"
| wrote:
|
| Zipper wrote:
| If the church were a member of PRS the money would be collected and
| distributed by them. No-one would hassle the family for a royalty cheque
|
|
| And if not? What would you do about it? N-O-T-H-I-N-G! You're just
| spouting BS to line your pockets.
|
| Certainly nothing: but the point is that the church would want to be
| aware of these issues and they may well not be.
|
|
| Bernard Hill
| Braeburn Software
| Author of Music Publisher system
| Music Software written by musicians for musicians
| http://www.braeburn.co.uk
| Selkirk, Scotland
|



-=ôö=- October 26th 03 03:12 PM

Urgent request
 
Drop it Bernard...you are being "Trolled" quite effectively here..


"Bernard Hill" wrote in message
...
| In article , Zipper
| writes
| On Sat, 25 Oct 2003 23:27:04 +0100, "Stimpy"
| wrote:
|
| Zipper wrote:
| If the church were a member of PRS the money would be collected and
| distributed by them. No-one would hassle the family for a royalty cheque
|
|
| And if not? What would you do about it? N-O-T-H-I-N-G! You're just
| spouting BS to line your pockets.
|
| Certainly nothing: but the point is that the church would want to be
| aware of these issues and they may well not be.
|
|
| Bernard Hill
| Braeburn Software
| Author of Music Publisher system
| Music Software written by musicians for musicians
| http://www.braeburn.co.uk
| Selkirk, Scotland
|



-=ôö=- October 26th 03 03:15 PM

Urgent request
 
Not all us Yanks are as brain dead or impolite...maybe Zipper and Noel should get
together...

but 2/10?? gezzzzzz I was thinking -2/10......

"Kurt Hamster" wrote in message
...
| On Sun, 26 Oct 2003 14:00:57 GMT, used
| to say...
|
| On Sun, 26 Oct 2003 13:54:28 +0000, Kurt Hamster
| wrote:
|
| It's starting to look like, based on the evidence of your posts, that
| everything that is said about the Yanks is true.
|
|
| Yes it is. What RU going to do about it you english faerie? Open your
| mouth and good 'ol GWB will bomb your asses into oblivion.
|
| As I suspected, a brain dead troll. You must be a net newbie 'cos there
| is no challenge in dealing with someone like you who seems to think a
| string of invective is the ideal troll. I suggest you do some research
| if you want to excel at your chosen pastime.
|
| Good luck, but only 2/10 for trying.
|
| Either rein it in, or remove the UK groups from your follow-ups
|
| Sorry buttnoid, I'm here to stay, your days of "polite" are over.
|
| I've been accused of many things before but polite has never been one of
| them.
|
|



-=ôö=- October 26th 03 03:15 PM

Urgent request
 
Not all us Yanks are as brain dead or impolite...maybe Zipper and Noel should get
together...

but 2/10?? gezzzzzz I was thinking -2/10......

"Kurt Hamster" wrote in message
...
| On Sun, 26 Oct 2003 14:00:57 GMT, used
| to say...
|
| On Sun, 26 Oct 2003 13:54:28 +0000, Kurt Hamster
| wrote:
|
| It's starting to look like, based on the evidence of your posts, that
| everything that is said about the Yanks is true.
|
|
| Yes it is. What RU going to do about it you english faerie? Open your
| mouth and good 'ol GWB will bomb your asses into oblivion.
|
| As I suspected, a brain dead troll. You must be a net newbie 'cos there
| is no challenge in dealing with someone like you who seems to think a
| string of invective is the ideal troll. I suggest you do some research
| if you want to excel at your chosen pastime.
|
| Good luck, but only 2/10 for trying.
|
| Either rein it in, or remove the UK groups from your follow-ups
|
| Sorry buttnoid, I'm here to stay, your days of "polite" are over.
|
| I've been accused of many things before but polite has never been one of
| them.
|
|



Keith G October 26th 03 03:24 PM

Urgent request
 

"Kurt Hamster" wrote


snip keyboard bravado


So which "little group" are you referring to? I ask as you don't seem to
be able to understand what crossposting to multiple groups means.



My fault entirely, Kurt - I started it I'm sorry to say. (The times I've
bitched about crossposting myself!)

Apologies to all concerned who deserve it - those who don't can go ****
themselves.......



crossposting left on to reach those where the damage has been done!






Keith G October 26th 03 03:24 PM

Urgent request
 

"Kurt Hamster" wrote


snip keyboard bravado


So which "little group" are you referring to? I ask as you don't seem to
be able to understand what crossposting to multiple groups means.



My fault entirely, Kurt - I started it I'm sorry to say. (The times I've
bitched about crossposting myself!)

Apologies to all concerned who deserve it - those who don't can go ****
themselves.......



crossposting left on to reach those where the damage has been done!






Keith G October 26th 03 04:04 PM

Urgent request
 

"Bernard Hill" wrote in message
...
In article , Keith G
writes



snippage

If the church and Funeral Director concerned haven't already taken the
necessary steps to 'legitimise' this sort of thing (given its apparent
prevalence) then it's bloody time they did!


Agreed there. But they may not be aware of the issue. I know my church
isn't.



That's a bit of an admission isn't it? Don't you think it would be a
positive step if you put them in the picture?


more snippage


Really? You should know better then! - 'Music software'??? - You're a

tiny
part of the whole bloody problem yourself, aren't you?


Bernard Hill
Braeburn Software
Author of Music Publisher system
Music Software written by musicians for musicians
http://www.braeburn.co.uk
Selkirk, Scotland

Er, why is that? I create and sell a music publishing system - ie one in
which you put your own compositions on paper. And in the literature and
web site it clearly warns you to have permission to do any work on
anyone else's music.



OK, not involved in the 'digitisation' of music as such, but you can still
be numbered among those who are generally involved with music, computers and
the Internet for financial gain. AFAIC the music for my partner's mum's
funeral (having been ordered and paid for and which may yet turn up in time,
according the Amazon's tracking information) is 'licensed'. Whether or not
the church and/or FD is licensed to broadcast it to a limited audience (and
whether or not either of them raise that issue) remains to be seen.

Where does this end? - Do I need a broadcast license to play a piece of
music to friends and members of my own family (for free) anywhere else other
than in a church? (Oil rigs and prisons, hopefully, not likely to be
included in the forseeable future....)


(Some crossposting left on as I don't know where you are coming from and I'm
back to only the two 'uk.rec.audio' groups.)












All times are GMT. The time now is 07:21 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.0.0
Copyright ©2004-2006 AudioBanter.co.uk