Urgent request
 

In article ,
Comp Piper writes

"Lebowski" wrote in

Hehehehe this thread is cracking me up. In one corner -
the pious fine
citizen of society strictly adhering to the letter of the
law; on the other
side - a dude who stands up for the "ordinary guy's" point
of view, not so
worked-up over such matters. It's a wonderful tussle.
Gotta love Usenet! :)

Your right, it is a pretty humorous thread!

Can't get excited or worked up over a few pennies of
copyright royalties!

On usenet, you survive by your wits only, nothing else
matters! ;-)

On uk.music.misc we are used to politeness and helpfulness.


Bernard Hill
Braeburn Software
Author of Music Publisher system
Music Software written by musicians for musicians
http://www.braeburn.co.uk
Selkirk, Scotland

Urgent request
 

In article , Zipper
writes
Look you jerkoff, if it looks like an arsehole, and smells like an
arsehole, then it is an an arsehole. You look, smell, and act like an
arsehole. We were talking about funerals, nobody has to pay royalties
to play a tune at a funeral, and only a low-life piece of **** would
question that, or exopect them too.

I fear you are in error. The church has a responsibility to attend to
these matters and will be grateful for the advice which I originally
posted.

I can't remember ever coming across anyone so abusive as you: you have
gone down in my estimation I fear.

Bernard Hill
Braeburn Software
Author of Music Publisher system
Music Software written by musicians for musicians
http://www.braeburn.co.uk
Selkirk, Scotland

Urgent request
 

In article , Zipper
writes
Look you jerkoff, if it looks like an arsehole, and smells like an
arsehole, then it is an an arsehole. You look, smell, and act like an
arsehole. We were talking about funerals, nobody has to pay royalties
to play a tune at a funeral, and only a low-life piece of **** would
question that, or exopect them too.

I fear you are in error. The church has a responsibility to attend to
these matters and will be grateful for the advice which I originally
posted.

I can't remember ever coming across anyone so abusive as you: you have
gone down in my estimation I fear.

Bernard Hill
Braeburn Software
Author of Music Publisher system
Music Software written by musicians for musicians
http://www.braeburn.co.uk
Selkirk, Scotland

Urgent request
 

In article , Zipper
writes
I Sat, 25 Oct 2003 17:37:37 +0100, "Stimpy"
wrote:

Zipper wrote:
Look you jerkoff, if it looks like an arsehole, and smells like an
arsehole, then it is an an arsehole. You look, smell, and act like an
arsehole. We were talking about funerals, nobody has to pay royalties
to play a tune at a funeral, and only a low-life piece of **** would
question that, or exopect them too.
Arsehole.

Wrong, you ignorant ****, funerals are not exempt from copyright law.


I didn't say they were you flaming dingleberry! Only that a PETTY
ARESHOLE would consider harassing the family to get their 5 cent
royalty check.


Nothing about the family in my post... It's the church's responsibility
as my second post pointed out.



Bernard Hill
Braeburn Software
Author of Music Publisher system
Music Software written by musicians for musicians
http://www.braeburn.co.uk
Selkirk, Scotland

Urgent request
 

In article , Zipper
writes
I Sat, 25 Oct 2003 17:37:37 +0100, "Stimpy"
wrote:

Zipper wrote:
Look you jerkoff, if it looks like an arsehole, and smells like an
arsehole, then it is an an arsehole. You look, smell, and act like an
arsehole. We were talking about funerals, nobody has to pay royalties
to play a tune at a funeral, and only a low-life piece of **** would
question that, or exopect them too.
Arsehole.

Wrong, you ignorant ****, funerals are not exempt from copyright law.


I didn't say they were you flaming dingleberry! Only that a PETTY
ARESHOLE would consider harassing the family to get their 5 cent
royalty check.


Nothing about the family in my post... It's the church's responsibility
as my second post pointed out.



Bernard Hill
Braeburn Software
Author of Music Publisher system
Music Software written by musicians for musicians
http://www.braeburn.co.uk
Selkirk, Scotland

Urgent request
 

In article , Zipper
writes
On Sat, 25 Oct 2003 23:27:04 +0100, "Stimpy"
wrote:

Zipper wrote:
If the church were a member of PRS the money would be collected and
distributed by them. No-one would hassle the family for a royalty cheque


And if not? What would you do about it? N-O-T-H-I-N-G! You're just
spouting BS to line your pockets.

Certainly nothing: but the point is that the church would want to be
aware of these issues and they may well not be.


Bernard Hill
Braeburn Software
Author of Music Publisher system
Music Software written by musicians for musicians
http://www.braeburn.co.uk
Selkirk, Scotland

Urgent request
 

In article , Zipper
writes
On Sat, 25 Oct 2003 23:27:04 +0100, "Stimpy"
wrote:

Zipper wrote:
If the church were a member of PRS the money would be collected and
distributed by them. No-one would hassle the family for a royalty cheque


And if not? What would you do about it? N-O-T-H-I-N-G! You're just
spouting BS to line your pockets.

Certainly nothing: but the point is that the church would want to be
aware of these issues and they may well not be.


Bernard Hill
Braeburn Software
Author of Music Publisher system
Music Software written by musicians for musicians
http://www.braeburn.co.uk
Selkirk, Scotland

Urgent request
 

In article , Keith G
writes

"Bernard Hill" wrote in message
...
In article , Baggy
writes
On Fri, 24 Oct 2003 23:18:44 +0100, Bernard Hill
wrote:

I'm with you John. What kind of an idiot would post such crap over a
funeral?

One who earns his sole livelihood by creating copyrighted products, and
who happens to be a member (and, indeed, treasurer) of a church which
takes the law and copyright responsibilities seriously.

In other words, a gr1 arsehole.

That I think is personal abuse. I am astonished that on a music
newsgroup some visitors are not aware of the importance of copyright
conformance.



Whoah! Whoah! Whoah! Enough already!

That's reasonable.


Lighten up Bernard - you're heading for total meltdown!

On the contrary, when things get heated I tend to go rather cool.

My original request (which I now regret since it has resulted in this
acrimony and especially since the tracks requested were, in fact, actually
supplied by my own son and a personal friend) mentioned that 'time was of
the essence'. If it makes you happier, a phone call this morning informs me
that neither my rips or the Amazon disk have turned up this morning and it
looks like they might miss the boat, as they are wanted Monday latest for
the funeral (of a *very* respectable Scottish woman) on Tuesday.

I already explained that a duplicate of an existing CD (but missing - due to
probably been loaned out) has already been purchased for only FOURTEEN QUID+
(not too bad for the sort of disk which can be had for 1.99 at any garage
hereabouts.....) so I don't see how anyone can be accused of trying to rip
the situation off in terms of paying one's dues to the MI as a whole. (Mel
Gibson and John Horner both phoned to express their regrets and said 'go
ahead'....... )

If the church and Funeral Director concerned haven't already taken the
necessary steps to 'legitimise' this sort of thing (given its apparent
prevalence) then it's bloody time they did!

Agreed there. But they may not be aware of the issue. I know my church
isn't.


The greedy MI as a whole needs to look to itself pretty smartish. To me the
whole concept of Royalties (especially in this day and age with the
profusion of recording devices and the ease of global distribution via the
'Net) is absolutely ludicrous and is the root of all the current problems.
(Study the Naxos concept for an example of a much better approach to the
sale and distribution of recorded music.)

(ukra and ukrav sunbscribers can a expect a rant about MI greed and its
effect on music generally in the very near future....)

As David Bowie said on the box - an organisation that is looking to sue its
own customers (see above references to Amazon in my case) is heading for
some sort of major disaster....


The law is the law, and is independent of the morality of those it
protects. That's my one and only point.



Really? You should know better then! - 'Music software'??? - You're a tiny
part of the whole bloody problem yourself, aren't you?


Bernard Hill
Braeburn Software
Author of Music Publisher system
Music Software written by musicians for musicians
http://www.braeburn.co.uk
Selkirk, Scotland

Er, why is that? I create and sell a music publishing system - ie one in
which you put your own compositions on paper. And in the literature and
web site it clearly warns you to have permission to do any work on
anyone else's music.



Bernard Hill
Braeburn Software
Author of Music Publisher system
Music Software written by musicians for musicians
http://www.braeburn.co.uk
Selkirk, Scotland

Urgent request
 

In article , Keith G
writes

"Bernard Hill" wrote in message
...
In article , Baggy
writes
On Fri, 24 Oct 2003 23:18:44 +0100, Bernard Hill
wrote:

I'm with you John. What kind of an idiot would post such crap over a
funeral?

One who earns his sole livelihood by creating copyrighted products, and
who happens to be a member (and, indeed, treasurer) of a church which
takes the law and copyright responsibilities seriously.

In other words, a gr1 arsehole.

That I think is personal abuse. I am astonished that on a music
newsgroup some visitors are not aware of the importance of copyright
conformance.



Whoah! Whoah! Whoah! Enough already!

That's reasonable.


Lighten up Bernard - you're heading for total meltdown!

On the contrary, when things get heated I tend to go rather cool.

My original request (which I now regret since it has resulted in this
acrimony and especially since the tracks requested were, in fact, actually
supplied by my own son and a personal friend) mentioned that 'time was of
the essence'. If it makes you happier, a phone call this morning informs me
that neither my rips or the Amazon disk have turned up this morning and it
looks like they might miss the boat, as they are wanted Monday latest for
the funeral (of a *very* respectable Scottish woman) on Tuesday.

I already explained that a duplicate of an existing CD (but missing - due to
probably been loaned out) has already been purchased for only FOURTEEN QUID+
(not too bad for the sort of disk which can be had for 1.99 at any garage
hereabouts.....) so I don't see how anyone can be accused of trying to rip
the situation off in terms of paying one's dues to the MI as a whole. (Mel
Gibson and John Horner both phoned to express their regrets and said 'go
ahead'....... )

If the church and Funeral Director concerned haven't already taken the
necessary steps to 'legitimise' this sort of thing (given its apparent
prevalence) then it's bloody time they did!

Agreed there. But they may not be aware of the issue. I know my church
isn't.


The greedy MI as a whole needs to look to itself pretty smartish. To me the
whole concept of Royalties (especially in this day and age with the
profusion of recording devices and the ease of global distribution via the
'Net) is absolutely ludicrous and is the root of all the current problems.
(Study the Naxos concept for an example of a much better approach to the
sale and distribution of recorded music.)

(ukra and ukrav sunbscribers can a expect a rant about MI greed and its
effect on music generally in the very near future....)

As David Bowie said on the box - an organisation that is looking to sue its
own customers (see above references to Amazon in my case) is heading for
some sort of major disaster....


The law is the law, and is independent of the morality of those it
protects. That's my one and only point.



Really? You should know better then! - 'Music software'??? - You're a tiny
part of the whole bloody problem yourself, aren't you?


Bernard Hill
Braeburn Software
Author of Music Publisher system
Music Software written by musicians for musicians
http://www.braeburn.co.uk
Selkirk, Scotland

Er, why is that? I create and sell a music publishing system - ie one in
which you put your own compositions on paper. And in the literature and
web site it clearly warns you to have permission to do any work on
anyone else's music.



Bernard Hill
Braeburn Software
Author of Music Publisher system
Music Software written by musicians for musicians
http://www.braeburn.co.uk
Selkirk, Scotland

Urgent request
 

In article ,
Comp Piper wrote:
On usenet, you survive by your wits only, nothing else
matters! ;-)

When's *your* funeral, then?

--
*If all the world is a stage, where is the audience sitting?

Dave Plowman London SW 12
RIP Acorn

Urgent request
 

In article ,
Comp Piper wrote:
On usenet, you survive by your wits only, nothing else
matters! ;-)

When's *your* funeral, then?

--
*If all the world is a stage, where is the audience sitting?

Dave Plowman London SW 12
RIP Acorn

Urgent request
 

get broadband..............then zip and email

You can't Zip an MP3, it's already compressed...
P
"malcolm" wrote in message
news:pgimb.20022$e01.38385@attbi_s02...
get broadband..............then zip and email

"Jonathan Greaves" wrote in message
...
Any idea how to send a 3.37mb file ?
I got the Highland Cathedral

Good luck
Jonathan






---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.525 / Virus Database: 322 - Release Date: 09/10/2003

Urgent request
 

get broadband..............then zip and email

You can't Zip an MP3, it's already compressed...
P
"malcolm" wrote in message
news:pgimb.20022$e01.38385@attbi_s02...
get broadband..............then zip and email

"Jonathan Greaves" wrote in message
...
Any idea how to send a 3.37mb file ?
I got the Highland Cathedral

Good luck
Jonathan






---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.525 / Virus Database: 322 - Release Date: 09/10/2003

Urgent request
 

On Sun, 26 Oct 2003 13:08:16 -0000
"Paul" wrote:

You can't Zip an MP3, it's already compressed...

You can, its just pointless.

can you quote properly please, btw?

--
Spyros lair: http://www.mnementh.co.uk/ |||| Maintainer: arm26 linux

Do not meddle in the affairs of Dragons, for you are tasty and good with
ketchup.

Urgent request
 

On Sun, 26 Oct 2003 13:08:16 -0000
"Paul" wrote:

You can't Zip an MP3, it's already compressed...

You can, its just pointless.

can you quote properly please, btw?

--
Spyros lair: http://www.mnementh.co.uk/ |||| Maintainer: arm26 linux

Do not meddle in the affairs of Dragons, for you are tasty and good with
ketchup.

Urgent request
 

On Sun, 26 Oct 2003 09:17:14 +0000, Bernard Hill
I consider, sir, that you are being abusive. It is possibly because of
the cross-posting going on here.

Quite possibly. However you must also consider I maybe being abusive
because you're a petty arsehole who has no respect for the dead, or
you're just another english fukhed.

n the forum I am visiting
(uk.music.misc) we tend to be polite.


Idiots tend to be that way.

The point is not what the cost is, but what the right thing to do is.

Don't worry you money grubbing little prick, we wouldn't think of
screwing you out of your 1/10th of one percent royalties.
Seems I've found a new group to set straight. I'll be joining
rec.englishfaggotts.morons.UK real soon.

Urgent request
 

On Sun, 26 Oct 2003 09:17:14 +0000, Bernard Hill
I consider, sir, that you are being abusive. It is possibly because of
the cross-posting going on here.

Quite possibly. However you must also consider I maybe being abusive
because you're a petty arsehole who has no respect for the dead, or
you're just another english fukhed.

n the forum I am visiting
(uk.music.misc) we tend to be polite.


Idiots tend to be that way.

The point is not what the cost is, but what the right thing to do is.

Don't worry you money grubbing little prick, we wouldn't think of
screwing you out of your 1/10th of one percent royalties.
Seems I've found a new group to set straight. I'll be joining
rec.englishfaggotts.morons.UK real soon.

Urgent request
 

On Sun, 26 Oct 2003 09:20:11 +0000, Bernard Hill
wrote:


Sir, you are being abusive. Please desist.


Drop dead you english prick.

I suspect I attend and am involved in more funerals than you,

Mass murderer?

ince I
play the organ for them all in my church,

Being english it's much more likely you played WITH your organ in
church.

so have considerable sympathy
for the bereaved. My comments were in fact aimed at the church, whose
responsibility it is to attend to these copyright matters.


So just how many churchs did you reach on rec.musicmakers.bagpipe you
fukin' moron?

Urgent request
 

On Sun, 26 Oct 2003 09:20:11 +0000, Bernard Hill
wrote:


Sir, you are being abusive. Please desist.


Drop dead you english prick.

I suspect I attend and am involved in more funerals than you,

Mass murderer?

ince I
play the organ for them all in my church,

Being english it's much more likely you played WITH your organ in
church.

so have considerable sympathy
for the bereaved. My comments were in fact aimed at the church, whose
responsibility it is to attend to these copyright matters.


So just how many churchs did you reach on rec.musicmakers.bagpipe you
fukin' moron?

Urgent request
 

On Sun, 26 Oct 2003 09:21:30 +0000, Bernard Hill
wrote:

On uk.music.misc we are used to politeness and helpfulness.


Oh?Believe me when I tell you that those days are now over. Being
seeing you there limey *******.

Urgent request
 

On Sun, 26 Oct 2003 09:21:30 +0000, Bernard Hill
wrote:

On uk.music.misc we are used to politeness and helpfulness.


Oh?Believe me when I tell you that those days are now over. Being
seeing you there limey *******.

Urgent request
 

On Sun, 26 Oct 2003 12:20:20 +0000, Kurt Hamster
wrote:

On Sun, 26 Oct 2003 09:23:16 +0000, Bernard Hill used
to say...

I can't remember ever coming across anyone so abusive as you: you have
gone down in my estimation I fear.

Hee hee hee..

Urgent request
 

On Sun, 26 Oct 2003 12:20:20 +0000, Kurt Hamster
wrote:

On Sun, 26 Oct 2003 09:23:16 +0000, Bernard Hill used
to say...

I can't remember ever coming across anyone so abusive as you: you have
gone down in my estimation I fear.

Hee hee hee..

Urgent request
 

On Sun, 26 Oct 2003 09:25:07 +0000, Bernard Hill
wrote:

Certainly nothing: but the point is that the church would want to be
aware of these issues and they may well not be.

Look dumbass, they aren't aware because here in the USA we don't give
a rats ass about petty-ante crap like you arseholes do.

Urgent request
 

On Sun, 26 Oct 2003 09:25:07 +0000, Bernard Hill
wrote:

Certainly nothing: but the point is that the church would want to be
aware of these issues and they may well not be.

Look dumbass, they aren't aware because here in the USA we don't give
a rats ass about petty-ante crap like you arseholes do.

Urgent request
 

On Sun, 26 Oct 2003 09:43:10 +0000 (GMT), Dave Plowman
wrote:

In article ,
Comp Piper wrote:
On usenet, you survive by your wits only, nothing else
matters! ;-)

When's *your* funeral, then?

I volunteer to help fill in Johns grave. A trip to Taco Bell the night
before should produce a significant amount of top soil.

Urgent request
 

On Sun, 26 Oct 2003 09:43:10 +0000 (GMT), Dave Plowman
wrote:

In article ,
Comp Piper wrote:
On usenet, you survive by your wits only, nothing else
matters! ;-)

When's *your* funeral, then?

I volunteer to help fill in Johns grave. A trip to Taco Bell the night
before should produce a significant amount of top soil.

Urgent request
 

On Sun, 26 Oct 2003 13:54:28 +0000, Kurt Hamster
wrote:

It's starting to look like, based on the evidence of your posts, that
everything that is said about the Yanks is true.


Yes it is. What RU going to do about it you english faerie? Open your
mouth and good 'ol GWB will bomb your asses into oblivion.

Either rein it in, or remove the UK groups from your follow-ups

Sorry buttnoid, I'm here to stay, your days of "polite" are over.

Urgent request
 

On Sun, 26 Oct 2003 13:54:28 +0000, Kurt Hamster
wrote:

It's starting to look like, based on the evidence of your posts, that
everything that is said about the Yanks is true.


Yes it is. What RU going to do about it you english faerie? Open your
mouth and good 'ol GWB will bomb your asses into oblivion.

Either rein it in, or remove the UK groups from your follow-ups

Sorry buttnoid, I'm here to stay, your days of "polite" are over.

Urgent request
 

On Sun, 26 Oct 2003 09:28:44 +0000, Bernard Hill
wrote:


Agreed there. But they may not be aware of the issue. I know my church
isn't.


Butt how could they not Burnhard? I would think with a grA arsehole
like you around that you would've made them aware.

Urgent request
 

On Sun, 26 Oct 2003 09:28:44 +0000, Bernard Hill
wrote:


Agreed there. But they may not be aware of the issue. I know my church
isn't.


Butt how could they not Burnhard? I would think with a grA arsehole
like you around that you would've made them aware.

Urgent request
 

On Sun, 26 Oct 2003 14:10:30 +0000, Kurt Hamster
wrote:

As I suspected, a brain dead troll. You must be a net newbie 'cos there
is no challenge in dealing with someone like you who seems to think a
string of invective is the ideal troll. I suggest you do some research
if you want to excel at your chosen pastime.

Well arsehole you just sealed your fate. You have no idea who you are
dealing with, butt you are about to find out. Your group is as good as
dead now. Care to lay a wager or two as to wether you'll still be in a
year? Do a search on Rec.Musicmakers.bagpipe, and go back about 4
years, count the number of daily posts (well over a hundred on a slow
day) and compare it to now. I guess it just goes to show you what a
dumbass you are Burnedhard


Good luck, but only 2/10 for trying.


LOL, what a jerk.


Either rein it in, or remove the UK groups from your follow-ups


I'm here to stay. Ask RMMB what those words mean.


Sorry buttnoid, I'm here to stay, your days of "polite" are over.

I've been accused of many things before but polite has never been one of
them.


You can't even read you limey pighead? It was said (not by me) that
this little group was polite. I'm here to tell you that's over now.
RIP.

Urgent request
 

On Sun, 26 Oct 2003 14:10:30 +0000, Kurt Hamster
wrote:

As I suspected, a brain dead troll. You must be a net newbie 'cos there
is no challenge in dealing with someone like you who seems to think a
string of invective is the ideal troll. I suggest you do some research
if you want to excel at your chosen pastime.

Well arsehole you just sealed your fate. You have no idea who you are
dealing with, butt you are about to find out. Your group is as good as
dead now. Care to lay a wager or two as to wether you'll still be in a
year? Do a search on Rec.Musicmakers.bagpipe, and go back about 4
years, count the number of daily posts (well over a hundred on a slow
day) and compare it to now. I guess it just goes to show you what a
dumbass you are Burnedhard


Good luck, but only 2/10 for trying.


LOL, what a jerk.


Either rein it in, or remove the UK groups from your follow-ups


I'm here to stay. Ask RMMB what those words mean.


Sorry buttnoid, I'm here to stay, your days of "polite" are over.

I've been accused of many things before but polite has never been one of
them.


You can't even read you limey pighead? It was said (not by me) that
this little group was polite. I'm here to tell you that's over now.
RIP.

Urgent request
 

Drop it Bernard...you are being "Trolled" quite effectively here..


"Bernard Hill" wrote in message
...
| In article , Zipper
| writes
| On Sat, 25 Oct 2003 23:27:04 +0100, "Stimpy"
| wrote:
|
| Zipper wrote:
| If the church were a member of PRS the money would be collected and
| distributed by them. No-one would hassle the family for a royalty cheque
|
|
| And if not? What would you do about it? N-O-T-H-I-N-G! You're just
| spouting BS to line your pockets.
|
| Certainly nothing: but the point is that the church would want to be
| aware of these issues and they may well not be.
|
|
| Bernard Hill
| Braeburn Software
| Author of Music Publisher system
| Music Software written by musicians for musicians
| http://www.braeburn.co.uk
| Selkirk, Scotland
|

Urgent request
 

Drop it Bernard...you are being "Trolled" quite effectively here..


"Bernard Hill" wrote in message
...
| In article , Zipper
| writes
| On Sat, 25 Oct 2003 23:27:04 +0100, "Stimpy"
| wrote:
|
| Zipper wrote:
| If the church were a member of PRS the money would be collected and
| distributed by them. No-one would hassle the family for a royalty cheque
|
|
| And if not? What would you do about it? N-O-T-H-I-N-G! You're just
| spouting BS to line your pockets.
|
| Certainly nothing: but the point is that the church would want to be
| aware of these issues and they may well not be.
|
|
| Bernard Hill
| Braeburn Software
| Author of Music Publisher system
| Music Software written by musicians for musicians
| http://www.braeburn.co.uk
| Selkirk, Scotland
|

Urgent request
 

Not all us Yanks are as brain dead or impolite...maybe Zipper and Noel should get
together...

but 2/10?? gezzzzzz I was thinking -2/10......

"Kurt Hamster" wrote in message
...
| On Sun, 26 Oct 2003 14:00:57 GMT, used
| to say...
|
| On Sun, 26 Oct 2003 13:54:28 +0000, Kurt Hamster
| wrote:
|
| It's starting to look like, based on the evidence of your posts, that
| everything that is said about the Yanks is true.
|
|
| Yes it is. What RU going to do about it you english faerie? Open your
| mouth and good 'ol GWB will bomb your asses into oblivion.
|
| As I suspected, a brain dead troll. You must be a net newbie 'cos there
| is no challenge in dealing with someone like you who seems to think a
| string of invective is the ideal troll. I suggest you do some research
| if you want to excel at your chosen pastime.
|
| Good luck, but only 2/10 for trying.
|
| Either rein it in, or remove the UK groups from your follow-ups
|
| Sorry buttnoid, I'm here to stay, your days of "polite" are over.
|
| I've been accused of many things before but polite has never been one of
| them.
|
|

Urgent request
 

Not all us Yanks are as brain dead or impolite...maybe Zipper and Noel should get
together...

but 2/10?? gezzzzzz I was thinking -2/10......

"Kurt Hamster" wrote in message
...
| On Sun, 26 Oct 2003 14:00:57 GMT, used
| to say...
|
| On Sun, 26 Oct 2003 13:54:28 +0000, Kurt Hamster
| wrote:
|
| It's starting to look like, based on the evidence of your posts, that
| everything that is said about the Yanks is true.
|
|
| Yes it is. What RU going to do about it you english faerie? Open your
| mouth and good 'ol GWB will bomb your asses into oblivion.
|
| As I suspected, a brain dead troll. You must be a net newbie 'cos there
| is no challenge in dealing with someone like you who seems to think a
| string of invective is the ideal troll. I suggest you do some research
| if you want to excel at your chosen pastime.
|
| Good luck, but only 2/10 for trying.
|
| Either rein it in, or remove the UK groups from your follow-ups
|
| Sorry buttnoid, I'm here to stay, your days of "polite" are over.
|
| I've been accused of many things before but polite has never been one of
| them.
|
|

Urgent request
 

"Kurt Hamster" wrote


snip keyboard bravado


So which "little group" are you referring to? I ask as you don't seem to
be able to understand what crossposting to multiple groups means.


My fault entirely, Kurt - I started it I'm sorry to say. (The times I've
bitched about crossposting myself!)

Apologies to all concerned who deserve it - those who don't can go ****
themselves.......



crossposting left on to reach those where the damage has been done!

Urgent request
 

"Kurt Hamster" wrote


snip keyboard bravado


So which "little group" are you referring to? I ask as you don't seem to
be able to understand what crossposting to multiple groups means.


My fault entirely, Kurt - I started it I'm sorry to say. (The times I've
bitched about crossposting myself!)

Apologies to all concerned who deserve it - those who don't can go ****
themselves.......



crossposting left on to reach those where the damage has been done!

Urgent request
 

"Bernard Hill" wrote in message
...
In article , Keith G
writes


snippage

If the church and Funeral Director concerned haven't already taken the
necessary steps to 'legitimise' this sort of thing (given its apparent
prevalence) then it's bloody time they did!

Agreed there. But they may not be aware of the issue. I know my church
isn't.


That's a bit of an admission isn't it? Don't you think it would be a
positive step if you put them in the picture?


more snippage


Really? You should know better then! - 'Music software'??? - You're a
tiny
part of the whole bloody problem yourself, aren't you?


Bernard Hill
Braeburn Software
Author of Music Publisher system
Music Software written by musicians for musicians
http://www.braeburn.co.uk
Selkirk, Scotland

Er, why is that? I create and sell a music publishing system - ie one in
which you put your own compositions on paper. And in the literature and
web site it clearly warns you to have permission to do any work on
anyone else's music.


OK, not involved in the 'digitisation' of music as such, but you can still
be numbered among those who are generally involved with music, computers and
the Internet for financial gain. AFAIC the music for my partner's mum's
funeral (having been ordered and paid for and which may yet turn up in time,
according the Amazon's tracking information) is 'licensed'. Whether or not
the church and/or FD is licensed to broadcast it to a limited audience (and
whether or not either of them raise that issue) remains to be seen.

Where does this end? - Do I need a broadcast license to play a piece of
music to friends and members of my own family (for free) anywhere else other
than in a church? (Oil rigs and prisons, hopefully, not likely to be
included in the forseeable future....)


(Some crossposting left on as I don't know where you are coming from and I'm
back to only the two 'uk.rec.audio' groups.)