Frequency response of the ear
 

"Dave Plowman (News)" wrote in message
...
In article ,
Keith G wrote:
The important point is that most of the people who *flounced* out of
here a while back were vinyl enthusiasts who got fed up with yours (and
a couple of others) continually bashing it. I know this because a
number of them have kept in touch - they are 'nice Brits (unlike me)
who prefer not to address unpleasantness in their leisure activites.

Wish you were more like them, then. Since you've reappeared, so have the
insults.


You should know, you start them (you *always* start them) - check the
posts....



Vinyl only gets bashed here when the likes of you attribute magical
qualities to it. Same as all your fads. Sensible points or questions tend
to get sensible answers.


Someone saying they *prefer* it or believe it to be more *realistic* is
attributing magical properties? - And who TF is it you think is looking for
answers from you?

I got noos for you, Poochie - speaking only for myself, you got *nothing* I
need to hear about.

(Answers, he says!!?? - Arrogant little ****!)

Frequency response of the ear
 

"Jenn" wrote in message
...
In article ,
"Dave Plowman (News)" wrote:


Vinyl only gets bashed here when the likes of you attribute magical
qualities to it.

I haven't posted here or read too much here, but I can attest to the
fact that there is one regular poster here who is fond of calling people
"vinyl bigots" if they simply state that they like the sound of some LPs.


Waste of time trying to confront Poochie with the truth Jenn, old bean -
he's the .5 of the 2.5 Denial Boyz who ruled here with their *Reign Of
Digital Terror* a while back - 'til I showed up and started dismantling
them....

:-)

Frequency response of the ear
 

"Keith G" wrote in message


The important point is that most of the people who
*flounced* out of here a while back were vinyl
enthusiasts who got fed up with yours (and a couple of
others) continually bashing it.

Describing vinyl as having audible noise and distortion is not bashing it.
No more than describing automobiles as vehicles that require gasoline is
bashing them.

I know this because a
number of them have kept in touch - they are 'nice Brits
(unlike me) who prefer not to address unpleasantness in
their leisure activities.

Know what I mean? ;-)

What I know is that you've got a place of your own Keith, named
uk.rec.audio.vinyl (urav).

If you think uk.rec.audio is dead, you obviously know nothing about urav.
BTW Keith, have you posted in urav today? This week? This month? This year?
Ever?

Frequency response of the ear
 

"Jenn" wrote in message

In article ,

"Dave Plowman (News)" wrote:

Vinyl only gets bashed here when the likes of you
attribute magical qualities to it.

I haven't posted here or read too much here, but I can
attest to the fact that there is one regular poster here
who is fond of calling people "vinyl bigots" if they
simply state that they like the sound of some LPs.

Lame attempt by Jenn to pretend that her posting history never existed.

Frequency response of the ear
 

"Arny Krueger" wrote in message
...
"Jenn" wrote in message

In article ,

"Dave Plowman (News)" wrote:

Vinyl only gets bashed here when the likes of you
attribute magical qualities to it.

I haven't posted here or read too much here, but I can
attest to the fact that there is one regular poster here
who is fond of calling people "vinyl bigots" if they
simply state that they like the sound of some LPs.

Lame attempt by Jenn to pretend that her posting history never existed.



Heh heh!

Your face *hot* is it, Arny? :-)

Frequency response of the ear
 

"Arny Krueger" wrote in message
...
"Keith G" wrote in message


The important point is that most of the people who
*flounced* out of here a while back were vinyl
enthusiasts who got fed up with yours (and a couple of
others) continually bashing it.

Describing vinyl as having audible noise and distortion is not bashing it.
No more than describing automobiles as vehicles that require gasoline is
bashing them.


The problem with your audible noise and distortion claims is that they are
based on what - a Rega plank and an M75 or somesuch?

See all my other posts where I mention all that crap that chops you to the
ground doesn't bother me in the least...

:-))

Sorreee....

:-)))



I know this because a
number of them have kept in touch - they are 'nice Brits
(unlike me) who prefer not to address unpleasantness in
their leisure activities.

Know what I mean? ;-)

What I know is that you've got a place of your own Keith, named
uk.rec.audio.vinyl (urav).


My own?? Like I could charge an entrance fee or summat?

Interesting prospect...



If you think uk.rec.audio is dead, you obviously know nothing about urav.
BTW Keith, have you posted in urav today? This week? This month? This
year? Ever?


See my reply to your Pooch - ukrav (mind the 'k' - it distinguishes us from
Uruguay) was only *flypaper* to trap you and the other bashers at the time -
if it took off then all well and good, but it didn't. (How many times can
you answer the 'How do I clean my records?' question?)

(Poochie correctly predicted it wouldn't run - the only time ever he wasn't
the *wrongest thing* in Usenet....)

Frequency response of the ear
 

"Keith G" wrote in message


"Arny Krueger" wrote in message
...

"Keith G" wrote in message


The important point is that most of the people who
*flounced* out of here a while back were vinyl
enthusiasts who got fed up with yours (and a couple of
others) continually bashing it.

Describing vinyl as having audible noise and distortion
is not bashing it. No more than describing automobiles
as vehicles that require gasoline is bashing them.

The problem with your audible noise and distortion claims
is that they are based on what - a Rega plank and an M75
or somesuch?

No, they are based on extensive listening to a wide variety of high end
vinyl setups at a variety of audiphile homes and high end audio shows.

Frequency response of the ear
 

"Arny Krueger" wrote in message
...
"Keith G" wrote


The problem with your audible noise and distortion claims
is that they are based on what - a Rega plank and an M75
or somesuch?

No, they are based on extensive listening to a wide variety of high end
vinyl setups at a variety of audiphile homes and high end audio shows.


The problem with vinyl is that there is so much detail to be had it leads
people to dig deeper and deeper for it - frankly, I reckon you'd be better
ignoring all that high end stuff (except the carts - can't spend too much on
those) and sticking with the Rega.

I've just done a couple of searches on eBay (co.uk):

Tube amp = 588 results

Quad amp = 129 results

Sony amp = 148 results

Yamaha amp = 85 results

Technics amp = 45 results

OK, in each case, the results are not all amplifiers but it's interesting,
isn't it - looks like nobody much is listening to your 'all tube amps are
broke' litany....??

Frequency response of the ear
 

In article ,
"Arny Krueger" wrote:

"Jenn" wrote in message

In article ,

"Dave Plowman (News)" wrote:

Vinyl only gets bashed here when the likes of you
attribute magical qualities to it.

I haven't posted here or read too much here, but I can
attest to the fact that there is one regular poster here
who is fond of calling people "vinyl bigots" if they
simply state that they like the sound of some LPs.

Lame attempt by Jenn to pretend that her posting history never existed.

Lame attempt by Arny to pretend that he can show anything to the
contrary.

Frequency response of the ear
 

"Jenn" wrote in message

In article
, "Arny
Krueger" wrote:

"Jenn" wrote in message

In article ,

"Dave Plowman (News)" wrote:

Vinyl only gets bashed here when the likes of you
attribute magical qualities to it.

I haven't posted here or read too much here, but I can
attest to the fact that there is one regular poster here
who is fond of calling people "vinyl bigots" if they
simply state that they like the sound of some LPs.

Lame attempt by Jenn to pretend that her posting history
never existed.

Lame attempt by Arny to pretend that he can show anything
to the contrary.

We've been here before Jenn. I document, you deny, I learn that you aren't
worth the time.